Just like SARS-COV-2, monkeypox does not have a test either. So, there is no way it can be detected, monitored, or “confirmed” by (PCR) testing. Please do not argue; it is not an opinion but a scientific fact. link
Author: Dr. Saeed Qureshi, Ph.D.
Researcher: ‘We Made a Big Mistake’ on COVID-19 Vaccine Article
The science clearly indicated a flawed and poor assessment of the mRNA vaccine and its dangers, which were described and predicted at the early stage of the vaccine’s development and introduction. See here. It was published on PSI as well (link)
The article makes an even bigger mistake: associating a protein (spike protein) with a nonexisting virus, i.e., rationalizing and justifying a nonexistent virus/illness and a “treatment” for it. ((link)).
It is controlled opposition, desperately trying to save the “science” and professions of viruses/medicines. However, I think they are dead now or will soon!
It is now obvious that two opposite views exist concerning the COVID-19 pandemic:
(1) the official one, supported mainly by physicians and related establishments, believes that the virus and the pandemic are real;
(2) the rest, mostly scientists, including some physicians and alternative medicine practicing groups, believe that the virus story is unscientific and a hoax.
However, as views held by both sides remain strong, the question is which view be considered correct and be followed. Until it is not decided which view is correct, it is impossible to address the virus and pandemic situation, and such cannot be stopped or avoided in the future. This article provides a discussion to address the issue by critically evaluating the handling of the issue by medical practitioners and establishments. Continue here
In short, test development and validation are separate expertise and are not part of the medical curriculum or training. The so-called virus, infection, and pandemic results from false and scientifically invalid testing. So, please, keep this thought in mind when seeking an opinion about testing from medical experts (1, 2).
The issue is that most of the pandemic descriptions/predictions are based on epidemiology which is not per se a science subject but a statistical data analysis routine. Epidemiologists use the data and assumptions provided to them by others, such as laboratories, to make predictions.
Unfortunately, they are often unaware of the relevancy and accuracy of the test used and/or the data obtained from the test – the PCR test in point. They have no idea that the test assumptions and procedures are flawed or corrupted. Therefore, their predictions are usually grossly inaccurate and unpredictable, as observed with the COVID-19 pandemic. Hence they should not be considered an authority on the COVID-19 until the testing choice and procedure are corrected.
The epidemiologists believe in the PCR test and that it is a relevant and accurate test and is telling about the virus – that is the problem. The problem can only be resolved by recognizing that testing and its data are false. Who would do that – not the epidemiologists or the medical experts, only the testing scientists such as analytical chemists, as an example? Hence, the false pandemic will continue for a while.
Virology, in particular, and modern medical “science,” in general, have so successfully brainwashed people that to be considered intelligent or worth listening to, one must first say that “I am not an anti-vaxxer.” Otherwise, they will be considered science deniers or intelligence deficient.
It is a very smart and effective con-artistry to protect and promote fraudulent science. Fortunately, this con-artistry will soon end at a huge human and financial cost!
The story (or tragedy) of COVID-19 is a case in point. I should qualify that practices and the tragedy of mandates (masks, social distances, vaccination, etc.) are ending. But unfortunately, vaccination’s tragedy (adverse effects) may continue for a long time.
The question is, why and how did this tragedy happen? It is because of the flawed (fraudulent) science of the vaxxers. But, first, people must recognize that it has never been science but an illusion (deception or fraud) of the science of naming diseases and selling “remedies,” which brought the tragedy.
Vaccination (vaxxers) is just one version of that broader tragedy, often sold as science-based medicines. In this respect, anti-vaxxers are, in fact, anti-false science of medicines and should be respected and not be labeled with disqualification.
Some say, “I am a Covid -19 mRNA gene therapy; Experimental “vaccine” anti-vaxxer, not an anti-vaxxer.”
But, the current “vaccine” or its claims are made by the experts who claimed the goodness of earlier vaccines. They used the same old “scientific” approach to define the current vaccine’s goodness, e.g., calculating Relative Vaccine Efficacy (RVE) but promoted Vaccine Efficacy (VE) fraudulently, an unpardonable act (link). Furthermore, they used a test to monitor the virus, which has no link or relevance (link, link). Moreover, no study has ever been conducted with an (isolated) virus, but with some filth (isolate/cell culture) presented as the virus – this is not scientific or science but a fraud! (link, link)
Believe it or not, the vaxxers have nothing to show for the past four decades of “scientific research” but false claims and deceptions supported by buddies (peers). Therefore, saying that I am not an anti-vaxxer indirectly supports the vaccination and its false science. Please do not do that – communicate clearly and directly your objections to challenge the fraudulent science of viruses and/or virology.
For further reading:
- The virus – deception at its best! (link)
- COVID-19: Open letter to physicians, pharmacists, and laboratory managers (link)
- Buyer Beware! (link)
- Vaccines efficacy (link)
- COVID and science divergence (link)
- COVID and vaccines – ask and listen (link)
- COVID-19: The virus does not exist – it is confirmed! (link)
- (Video) Virus, COVID, pandemic, vaccine, and testing: fiction, not reality or science! (link)
A couple of my followers on social media brought, to my attention, a recent publication published under a variety of headings, including news media, seeking opinion concerning the validity of claims made [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].
In short, the study describes observations after inoculating the claimed SARS-COV-2 virus to healthy human volunteers to produce the virus effects.
The study claims that volunteers were “inoculated with 10 TCID50 of a wild-type virus (SARS-CoV-2/human/GBR/484861/2020) intranasally in an open-label, non-randomized study …” [2]
This statement is incorrect and deceitful.
The study did not use the virus but an “isolate.” An isolate means part/portion of the growth culture (gunk) from a swab sample, with multiple ingredients added, including cells or debris, such as Africam green monkey kidney cells (or Vero cells).
Please, follow the (link) to see the description of the “virus.” It uses the word isolate in the title, not the virus, as presumed by the study’s authors.
I previously described the differences between a virus and the “isolate” on my blog. Please see here; (1, 2).
It further confirms that there has never been a virus (SARS-COV-2) isolated, and no virus sample is available anywhere. Therefore, scientifically speaking, the virus (SARS-COV-2) and its illness (COVID-19 ) and its pandemic have been a hoax, as previously described (1,2, 3). The reported study provides further support for such an understanding.
The publication will undoubtedly cause serious damage to the scientific credibility of the journal and study authors. In addition, it will further expose the fictitiousness or fraudulent science aspect of virology.