The issue is that most of the pandemic descriptions/predictions are based on epidemiology which is not per se a science subject but a statistical data analysis routine. Epidemiologists use the data and assumptions provided to them by others, such as laboratories, to make predictions.
Unfortunately, they are often unaware of the relevancy and accuracy of the test used and/or the data obtained from the test – the PCR test in point. They have no idea that the test assumptions and procedures are flawed or corrupted. Therefore, their predictions are usually grossly inaccurate and unpredictable, as observed with the COVID-19 pandemic. Hence they should not be considered an authority on the COVID-19 until the testing choice and procedure are corrected.
The epidemiologists believe in the PCR test and that it is a relevant and accurate test and is telling about the virus – that is the problem. The problem can only be resolved by recognizing that testing and its data are false. Who would do that – not the epidemiologists or the medical experts, only the testing scientists such as analytical chemists, as an example? Hence, the false pandemic will continue for a while.