Author: Dr. Saeed Qureshi, Ph.D.

Coronavirus pandemic has resulted in an intense debate about the legitimacy of the pandemic, the existence and isolation of the virus, and perhaps more importantly, the development and relevancy of vaccines. This article provides a critical view highlighting the potential cause of the debate. It is argued that the practice of medicines is mistakenly also considered the science of medicines. It is further argued that there is no such thing as the “science of medicines” but a twisted and falsified version of the actual science – chemistry. Considering the pandemic and related topics as noted above and applying principles of chemistry, it would immediately be apparent that pandemic and its associated issues have no logical and scientific basis. (Continue here)

  • Stay indoors
  • Use restricted breathing with face masks
  • Apply copious amounts of pure chemicals (sanitizers)
  • Maintain distances from fellow humans
  • Avoid any physical interaction with friends and family, including hugging, talking, and laughing together, etc.
  • All communal soul-soothing (e.g., religious) activities should be considered super (evil) spreader and must be prohibited.
  • Consider meeting or seeing loved ones as non-essential
  • Must not have positive (PCR) test
  • Get injected with “lifesavers” (more pure chemicals)

One wonders if health authorities and experts have really studied anything about health and its care!

BTW: I took the picture some months ago, now such an activity would be considered non-essential and unhealthy and asked to be avoided.

As of April 7, 2021, the Government of Ontario, Canada, like other regions in the world, enforced another lockdown with a stay-home order. The stated reason is that the number of “cases” (not infections, illness, hospitalization, or ICU occupancies) has increased above a magical number, and the projections look worrisome.

Unfortunately, the ongoing somewhat lenient lockdown failed to create enough fear in people to “behave.” Lack of presumed obedience has created a problem for maintaining the people’s “safety” (read people are not showing enough interest or trust for the experimental vaccines). Click here to continue.

I received an email yesterday asking some questions about the PCR test. Considering that visitors to the blog may also find my answers useful, I share my responses here.

Dear …:

Answers to your questions may be found in one of my blog articles (link). Please consider reading it. For further clarity, I am providing answers to the questions below as well (in red letterings). I hope you will find the answers helpful.

Q: “If a SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been isolated, when the PCR test comes back positive, what has it positively identified?”
The PCR does not test for viruses, i.e., it is not a test for viruses. A PCR test determines the presence of PRESUMED (imagined) RNA or DNA. Therefore, as the viruses have never been isolated, the authenticity of their association to a specific RNA/DNA cannot be established.

A positive PCR test shows the presence of some RNA/DNA from an unknown source. It could be from many sources, including sometimes claimed to be from healthy subjects. A positive PCR test (often considered as “case”) has no scientific meaning or relevancy to the virus/illness.


Q: “Is it an influenza virus or some other virus?”
Again, a PCR test is not a test for influenza or any other virus. It is RNA/DNA test without its established or confirmed link to a specific virus..


Q: “In addition, can the PCR test distinguish between viruses?”
Of course not. PCR test is not for viruses, so it cannot differentiate between viruses.

.
Q: These are the two questions I have not been able to locate an answer to, and I would be grateful if you could provide clarification.

The reason for the lack of answers is that the PCR test belongs to the science of (analytical) chemistry. However, it is conducted and interpreted by others without appropriate training and knowledge of the subject. Therefore the PCR testing, as it is conducted now (i.e., for diagnosis purposes), must immediately be stopped as being irrelevant.

Another article which may be of interest in this regard would be (link)

Science is simple and straightforward that dictates:

  • If the claim is made that virus exists, then the virus has to be shown in isolated and pure form in a test tube or vial, but it has not been shown – anywhere!
  • If a test is claimed to test the presence of the virus, then it must be shown experimentally that the test is validated to do its job – but it has not been shown – anywhere!
  • If illness/infection is claimed to be caused by the virus. It must be shown experimentally by administering the isolated and pure virus – but it has not been shown – anywhere!
  • If a vaccine is claimed to provide a cure by killing the virus, then a live virus without the vaccine, and the dead virus with the vaccine, must be shown experimentally – but it has not been shown – anywhere!

Hence there is no science anywhere!

Proceed accordingly to treat the “observed” symptoms, if any, with traditional, regular, and well-established approaches or treatments with the help of knowledgeable physicians. Make sure you understand that you are fighting two wars (1) against the illness/infection; (2) against the propaganda (misinformation and fake science) based on computer-generated tests, viruses, vaccines, and hysterical scenarios.

If you find the information/articles helpful, do not forget to donate for the blog. Here is the PayPal link. Thank you!

Have faith!

Isolation and testing belong to analytical (chemistry) subjects. Unfortunately, non-chemistry-related subject experts are doing this work and mistakenly labeled it as isolation and testing. This is where the problem is.

Scientifically speaking, the virus has never been isolated, and by extension, relevant and valid tests cannot be developed or have never been developed (link).

Non-chemistry/analytical (chemistry) science experts have difficulty understanding this issue, let alone solving it. Please seek help from the people in the areas of testing (analytical or chemical) science.

The issue is not as complicated as presumed or presented. Viruses and pandemics will disappear quickly.