Author: Dr. Saeed Qureshi, Ph.D.

Science is simple and straightforward that dictates:

  • If the claim is made that virus exists, then the virus has to be shown in isolated and pure form in a test tube or vial, but it has not been shown – anywhere!
  • If a test is claimed to test the presence of the virus, then it must be shown experimentally that the test is validated to do its job – but it has not been shown – anywhere!
  • If illness/infection is claimed to be caused by the virus. It must be shown experimentally by administering the isolated and pure virus – but it has not been shown – anywhere!
  • If a vaccine is claimed to provide a cure by killing the virus, then a live virus without the vaccine, and the dead virus with the vaccine, must be shown experimentally – but it has not been shown – anywhere!

Hence there is no science anywhere!

Proceed accordingly to treat the “observed” symptoms, if any, with traditional, regular, and well-established approaches or treatments with the help of knowledgeable physicians. Make sure you understand that you are fighting two wars (1) against the illness/infection; (2) against the propaganda (misinformation and fake science) based on computer-generated tests, viruses, vaccines, and hysterical scenarios.

If you find the information/articles helpful, do not forget to donate for the blog. Here is the PayPal link. Thank you!

Have faith!

Isolation and testing belong to analytical (chemistry) subjects. Unfortunately, non-chemistry-related subject experts are doing this work and mistakenly labeled it as isolation and testing. This is where the problem is.

Scientifically speaking, the virus has never been isolated, and by extension, relevant and valid tests cannot be developed or have never been developed (link).

Non-chemistry/analytical (chemistry) science experts have difficulty understanding this issue, let alone solving it. Please seek help from the people in the areas of testing (analytical or chemical) science.

The issue is not as complicated as presumed or presented. Viruses and pandemics will disappear quickly.

I have been highlighting for some time that the virus (SARS-CoV-2) has never been isolated or positively identified [1,2,3,4]. Therefore, it cannot be claimed that the virus exists, and by extension, the story of the COVID pandemic cannot be considered science-based or factual.

This idea of non-isolation of the virus has been gaining traction. A recent report further emphasized that the SAR-CoV-2 has not been isolated, along with any other viruses in the coronavirus family [5].

The use of the word “isolate,” with the implied meaning or representation of the term isolation of the virus, misled everyone, including physicians, scientists, experts. They assumed that the virus or viruses are real and have been physically isolated.

The article mentioned [5] above also clearly discredit the PCR test’s relevance and usefulness, as I have been saying for quite some time [6,7,8]. A prestigious international expert on the subject, Dr. Stephen Bustin, is quoted, describing both the arbitrariness of criteria for RNA results and choosing the number of cycles leading to anyone testing positive for COVID.  The mentioned article [5] discusses the flaws of PCR tests and methodology for its use as a diagnostic tool.

On the other hand, as I have repeatedly described, the PCR test is a chemical test that has never been validated for its intended use. It is a blatant violation of the fundamental principle of science-based chemical/clinical testing. Such a test can never provide relevant and valid results. Surprisingly, such testing is accepted by the regulatory authorities, including the FDA. The test and its associated results should be withdrawn immediately.

In short, claims of isolation of the virus (SARS-CoV-2) and the PCR test are shown to be scientifically invalid and irrelevant.

A reference or link:

  1. of having seen or possessing a pure virus’s physical specimen, not an isolate or a picture of a mixture/gunk (commonly referred to as cell culture).
  2. To an experimental/scientific study showing that the suggested vaccines kill the virus in humans. A physical sample of the dead-virus in the presence of a vaccine or its derivative.
  3. Showing that face-masks (any type) stop or significantly reduce the virus’s passage (in or out). The study must include a virus sample (not droplets or aerosols only as a virus substitute).

Dear scientists, experts, and authorities, please help. These should be easy questions to answer with all the fundings you have obtained and claims you made.  Otherwise, what is the point?

PS: FYI, the answer is, such links or studies do not exist.

COVID-19 is a recently-labeled illness presumably caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2. The illness is considered contagious, i.e., assuming that the virus spreads from person to person directly or indirectly. It is believed that COVID-19 caused the pandemic resulting in a large number of deaths.

This article reflects an exercise in summarizing the data in seeking a potential trend from COVID-19 deaths to guide addressing the pandemic issue. (Continue here)

People should realize that reducing the Ct (cycle threshold) of the PCR test, as some suggest, may reduce the number of test-positive results. This will certainly help reduce the so-called pandemic—a trickery approach to bring the pandemic under control that never existed in the first place.

However, the fact remains that the PCR test is scientifically invalid, no matter how low Ct value one would set. To have a valid test, it requires to meet four well establish validation criteria: (i) specificity; (2) selectivity; (3) reproducibility; and (4) use of independently characterized reference standard. The first three criteria cannot be met if the reference standard (the #4) is not available. If the claim is that the PCR test monitors the presence or absence of the virus. Then reference virus must be available in its pure form. On the other hand, if virus RNA or its fragment is to be monitored, RNA or its fragment must be available as the reference standard and positively shown to be extracted from the virus (further details here).

Considering that the tests or testing are based on confirming the RNA sequencing only from an aliquot of media/culture/isolate, hence is a valid test, is pure nonsense. Such tests have no relevance to the virus, illness, and pandemic monitoring, and these PCR tests must be stopped immediately and preferably withdrawing all related results/data as false. This will be the legitimate and scientifically valid approach for getting out of the pandemic state.

It is hoped that science will prevail.