Pushers of PCR, Rapid/antigen, and drug dissolution tests should pay attention.
SAN JOSE, Calif., Nov 18 (Reuters) – A federal judge on Friday sentenced Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes to 11 years and three months in prison for defrauding investors in her now-defunct blood-testing startup that was once valued at $9 billion.
“U.S. Attorney Stephanie Hinds said the sentence for Holmes “reflects the audacity of her massive fraud and the staggering damage she caused.” (Link)
The PCR, Rapid/antigen and dissolution testing fall under the false (invalid) testing category. More details here (Link, Link, Link).
The following is a brief scientific explanation of mRNA technology, often presented as something new, advanced, or novel.
The literature described it (mRNA, messenger ribonucleic acid) as a chemical compound (a shorter version of nucleic acid or RNA), like a peptide molecule, compared to protein, the larger(chain or necklace) molecule. It may be impressive and overwhelming for medical professionals because of limited learning and understanding of science/chemistry; otherwise, nothing is unique or novel about its nature and characteristics as a chemical molecule/compound. (Continue here)
My old blog (www.drug-dissolution-testing.com) was hacked, damaged, and could not be repaired. So, to address the problem, I had to start a new blog which is www.bioanalyticx.com. It has been in use for the past several months. I have now moved all posts from the older site to the new site.
Sorry for all the inconvenience it may have caused in reaching out to the missing or corrupted posts.
The new site is working well. The site is given a new name to reflect the broader subject/science it covers. The site is possibly the best source of information on the scientific aspects of pharmaceuticals, including vaccines. But, more importantly, it provides an authoritative, independent third-party assessment of medical/pharmaceutical literature marred with a biased and one-sided (peer) view of those not appropriately trained in science subjects.
I hope you will continue visiting the site and introducing it to your friends and colleagues. Please, consider supporting the site with your generous donations. Without your support, it is becoming difficult to maintain the site and keep it up to date.
A little over six years ago, I wrote a blog describing the practice of nonsensical science for pharmaceutical evaluations at the regulatory authorities and the industry. My decades of experience seeing the “science” at regulatory authorities could be summarized as shown in the post here (Link).
In this regard, the “science” in the pharmaceutical area is based on a technique known as drug dissolution testing, which forms the basis of product quality assessments, particularly tablets and capsules. The testing is a mandatory requirement and is done worldwide.
Unfortunately, scientifically it is an invalid technique and should not be used for any purpose because it will provide a false assessment of the product quality and hence their safety and efficacy (Link).
Almost four years ago, I submitted a Citizen Petition to the FDA requesting to remove the invalid testers from the regulatory requirements. However, while acknowledging the invalidity of the testers, the FDA recently rejected the petition (Link).
It clearly shows incompetency in science at the authorities and disregard in addressing the issue related to assessing the safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical products.
If such a deficiency had occurred and been acknowledged by a manufacturer, it would have been shut down immediately, followed by legal ramifications – not so with the authorities or FDA.
The COVID-19 pandemic is a direct result of this ignorance and incompetence. The pandemic is also based on testing, which is known as PCR. The same problems have been noted with PCR testing, i.e., invalid testing that cannot detect viruses and their variants and vaccine efficacy (Link).
Therefore, by default, the pandemic becomes fake and false. Everything about viruses, vaccination, and the pandemic is based on flawed testing. Consequently, it has to be scientifically fake and false – period! However, authorities are promoting them as science-based, like the false claims of (high-quality) approved pharmaceutical products.
Moreover, like dissolution testing, highly confusing and irrelevant fancy technical jargon authenticated by high credential (mostly medical/pharmaceutical, not science) experts promoting the fake science of PCR-based viruses, testing, and vaccination (Link).
The problems associated with the virus, testing, and pharmaceutical products, including vaccines, are because of invalid testing (aka fake or pseudo-science), which requires immediate attention.
To understand “viruses” or anything related to diseases and medicines logically and scientifically, one needs to study and understand the actual science (chemistry subject). But unfortunately, “experts” ignore this aspect and make false and fraudulent claims.
Considering a fundamental understanding of the science subject, it was clear (and described) from the beginning of the pandemic that there is no virus, testing is false, and vaccines have to be fake and potentially dangerous.
So, when you hear medical/pharmaceutical experts on the topics, keep the above-mentioned thought in mind; most narratives will be fake and false.
The following will help in clarifying the issues.
COVID-19: The virus does not exist – it is confirmed! (link)
(Video) Virus, COVID, pandemic, vaccine, and testing: fiction, not reality or science! (link)
Science for the pandemic at the authorities: false in fact fraudulent – requires urgent action! (link)
It is critical to note that an M.D. degree is not a science degree. But unfortunately, holders of the degree are considered and promoted as scientists, which caused the erroneous claims of the viruses, testing, pandemic, and treatments (vaccines).
Most of the claims made in this regard, such as DNA/RNA, proteins, their isolation, purification, characterization, testing, and sequencing, belong to chemistry (science) subjects and should be part of such expertise and faculties.
There are indications that claims about the COVID-19 pandemic, made by experts with M.D. degrees and associated organizations such as CDC and FDA, are in retraction [link, link]. However, such (COVID-19, vaccination) aberrations are considered as rare, implying “science” is genuine and should continue as such for new and more viruses, illnesses, and vaccines.
When dealing with such claims, one should keep in mind that medical experts have never been able to show any evidence of the existence of the virus from any source, lab, or animal. Instead, their claims are based only on PCR testing or sequencing.
PCR testing is a scientifically invalid technique with no link to the virus/variants or illness. Further, the described sequencing technique is not sequencing but the opposite, i.e., assembling some chemical molecules to obtain computer-based fictional RNAs (chemical compounds, not viruses) — a scientifically invalid and false claim and practice.
The only reason such studies and claims are published and accepted is that they are reviewed or authenticated by “peers/buddies” with similar flawed training and mindset. Independent third-party reviews of the published literature by scientists with expertise in the respective subjects have never been done. In this respect, it would be safe to assume that most of the published literature based on PCR testing and sequencing assessments for viruses and their related illnesses must be false and scientifically invalid and should be retracted.
Further, in the future, medical degrees should be considered a trade certification, not a science degree, which will help avoid future disasters of faulty testing and misdiagnosis.
It is generally accepted now that the virus SARS-COV-2 has not been isolated. But unfortunately, virologists and medical experts still believe in it and make false claims. Their view on virus existence and/or isolation is described as follows (from the Reuters Fact Check team – link):
“There are numerous examples of scientists isolating SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID -19, and sequencing its genome. The argument about purification relates to 19th Century microbiological theory that does not apply to viruses. The novel coronavirus has been proven to exist and has caused millions of deaths worldwide.”
If one reads the sentence carefully, “The argument about purification relates to 19th Century microbiological theory that does not apply to viruses,” it means they do not believe in standard (old fashion) purification of things and do not have the (purified) virus. That is, there is no isolated virus available. Therefore, the non-existence of the virus has been accepted indirectly.
On the other hand, experts claim that the virus’s existence (“novel coronavirus has been proven to exist”) is based on the sequencing of virus RNA.
What is sequencing? “The genome (i.e., RNA) sequence of a virus is the sequence or order of bases or letters (representing nucleotides) that makes up a virus’s genetic material or its genome. If you were to write down the genome sequence of a particular coronavirus, it would be a series of about 30,000 letters.” (link).
RNAs, DNAs, genes, genomes, etc., are represented by four chemical compounds (nucleotides, or bases); adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine (or uracil). They are abbreviated by four alphabet letters ACGT (or ACGU).
Sequencing means learning or determining (experimentally) the exact sequence (order) of the building blocks (the letters) that make up all RNA molecules. It means one has to have an RNA, and its sequence is determined by chopping (the nucleotides) piece by piece. However, as described above, the virus is not available, and its RNA cannot be available either. Therefore, sequencing is not possible. Hence, sequencing of the virus or its RNA has never been done. Saying it otherwise is incorrect and deceptive.
What is being done is assembling/building short nucleic acid chains (opposite of sequencing) based on a pre-conceived template (called primers). The obtained short chains are then extended to longer chains using computer software and modeling, naming them as RNAs of the viruses or their variants. The technical name of this process is PCR or Polymerase Chain Reaction.
It is like, one is given some beads of four colors and asked to build imaginary necklaces. Then, the experts assemble necklaces, name them viruses or variants, and call this assembly step (incorrectly) sequencing!
Therefore, claims of RNA sequencing are scientifically inaccurate, and actual sequencing has never been done.
The covid tests do not detect viruses or variants. Instead, they detect chemicals/molecules, called RNAs and (spike) proteins, presumed, not shown, to be part of the SARS-COV-2 virus. These RNA and protein molecules can come from many different sources, including the body’s cell degradations, food one consumes, or bacteria. Unfortunately, medical experts assume that these chemicals come from the virus, and tests indicate that. This lack of understanding comes from the fact that the testing belongs to the subject of chemical science (analytical chemistry), not medical training. Hence false claims are being made for describing and interpreting the tests for viruses, variants, illnesses, or infections.
An analogy may further explain the current bizarre situation regarding the PCR test, which is considered the gold standard. The test is conducted by spiking/seeding the sample with the desired chemical molecule (RNA fragment of an imaginary RNA, called primer) to make it look like the test sample has an expected or wanted RNA or virus. However, it is an entirely invalid scientific practice.
It is like conducting a pregnancy test by spiking/seeding the urine or blood sample, with a small amount of pregnancy indicating chemical compound, to assess the pregnancy. Believe it or not, everyone, including men, can potentially be tested positive for pregnancy if desired.
The Rapid/Antigen test is based on a similar principle as PCR. But, the irony is that Rapid tests are authenticated by comparing against the PCR test (the invalid test), not the virus. So, the invalidity of the Rapid/Antigen test is multiplied.
Enjoy your life, do not waste it by judging it based on a fraudulent PCR/Rapid/Antigen test.
Since the beginning of 2020, Public healthcare has taken a paradigm shift from Evidence-based clinical practice to one of hypothesis/opinion based pandemic dependent clinical practices. Driven by misinformation, coercion, and conflict of interests from the globally unelected bodies like WHO, CDC, NIH, FDA, and country-wise health and welfare institutions. All this is fueled by the will full blindness and an act of survival by the guardians of healthcare – the healthcare professionals.
The pandemic was primarily driven by testing and positivity, not the threat of illness and fatality (which was less than 0.5%). Therefore it never qualified for any kind of emergency use authorization interventions (either novel drugs or vaccination).
All cause morbidity and mortality rates were falsely escalated by relating them to PCR positivity, not those related to respiratory failure (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ARDS). No proof was established through autopsies and direct evidence of viral dissemination. In fact, mandates of lockdowns and reduced access to critical care resulted in higher fatality rates of those with preexisting illnesses.
The helplessness of the primary care, overwhelmed state of emergency care physicians, and the misinformation about the threat to the global population (promoted by the MSM and political leadership) was conveniently utilized to bring the under-development vaccine as a holy grail.
Once this was established, the testing was conveniently disowned under the pretext of mass vaccination and the emergence of variants.
The emergence of variants story was so created to mask the failure of the vaccine to stop the transmission ( keeping alive the mandate of vaccination to reduce the severity of illness instead of transmission). The concept of Absolute risk reduction (the real clinical endpoint) was conveniently replaced by relative risk reduction anyway during initial clinical trials, which in itself is a fraudulent way of endorsing the efficacy of the vaccine.
Later in 2021, the story of insufficient vaccine response (by falsely measuring the unwanted systemic antibodies) was carried out to propose the need for boosters.
Our concerns surfaced when the rate of all-cause morbidities and mortalities increased post-vaccination period (among the vaccinated). An attempt to negate these concerns was fueled by bringing in the phenomenon of long covid cases.
Further, our concerns were raised when the vaccine mandate was extended to the younger adults and children.
The likely lifetime injuries, those observed in the older and younger adult population, remain an existential threat.
Those include hypercoagulation, cardiovascular complications, neurological diseases, higher propensity to cancer, reproductive disorders, and developmental disorders in the newborn.
The plausible mechanisms are hyperinflammation, dysfunctional immune reactions, and organ damage caused by an unknown entity in the vaccine.
Dr. C. Kannan Janakiraman Consultant & Patient Advocate Integrative medicine & Functional Nutrition Signmed Wellness Clinic #913, Ess Emm Square, 2nd D cross, 1st Block HRBR Layout, Kalyan nagar Bengaluru 560043 Karnataka state, INDIA Tel: +91 809 587 3684 / 914 131 9546 skype: cjanakir https://www.linkedin.com/in/ckannanjanakiraman/
