Category: Uncategorized

It is critical to note that an M.D. degree is not a science degree. But unfortunately, holders of the degree are considered and promoted as scientists, which caused the erroneous claims of the viruses, testing, pandemic, and treatments (vaccines).

Most of the claims made in this regard, such as DNA/RNA, proteins, their isolation, purification, characterization, testing, and sequencing, belong to chemistry (science) subjects and should be part of such expertise and faculties.

There are indications that claims about the COVID-19 pandemic, made by experts with M.D. degrees and associated organizations such as CDC and FDA, are in retraction [link, link]. However, such (COVID-19, vaccination) aberrations are considered as rare, implying “science” is genuine and should continue as such for new and more viruses, illnesses, and vaccines.

When dealing with such claims, one should keep in mind that medical experts have never been able to show any evidence of the existence of the virus from any source, lab, or animal. Instead, their claims are based only on PCR testing or sequencing.

PCR testing is a scientifically invalid technique with no link to the virus/variants or illness. Further, the described sequencing technique is not sequencing but the opposite, i.e., assembling some chemical molecules to obtain computer-based fictional RNAs (chemical compounds, not viruses) — a scientifically invalid and false claim and practice.

The only reason such studies and claims are published and accepted is that they are reviewed or authenticated by “peers/buddies” with similar flawed training and mindset. Independent third-party reviews of the published literature by scientists with expertise in the respective subjects have never been done. In this respect, it would be safe to assume that most of the published literature based on PCR testing and sequencing assessments for viruses and their related illnesses must be false and scientifically invalid and should be retracted.

Further, in the future, medical degrees should be considered a trade certification, not a science degree, which will help avoid future disasters of faulty testing and misdiagnosis.

For further details (link, link, link, link)

It is generally accepted now that the virus SARS-COV-2 has not been isolated. But unfortunately, virologists and medical experts still believe in it and make false claims. Their view on virus existence and/or isolation is described as follows (from the Reuters Fact Check team – link):

“There are numerous examples of scientists isolating SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID -19, and sequencing its genome. The argument about purification relates to 19th Century microbiological theory that does not apply to viruses. The novel coronavirus has been proven to exist and has caused millions of deaths worldwide.”

If one reads the sentence carefully, “The argument about purification relates to 19th Century microbiological theory that does not apply to viruses,” it means they do not believe in standard (old fashion) purification of things and do not have the (purified) virus. That is, there is no isolated virus available. Therefore, the non-existence of the virus has been accepted indirectly.

On the other hand, experts claim that the virus’s existence (“novel coronavirus has been proven to exist”) is based on the sequencing of virus RNA.

What is sequencing? “The genome (i.e., RNA) sequence of a virus is the sequence or order of bases or letters (representing nucleotides) that makes up a virus’s genetic material or its genome. If you were to write down the genome sequence of a particular coronavirus, it would be a series of about 30,000 letters.” (link).

RNAs, DNAs, genes, genomes, etc., are represented by four chemical compounds (nucleotides, or bases); adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine (or uracil). They are abbreviated by four alphabet letters ACGT (or ACGU).

Sequencing means learning or determining (experimentally) the exact sequence (order) of the building blocks (the letters) that make up all RNA molecules. It means one has to have an RNA, and its sequence is determined by chopping (the nucleotides) piece by piece. However, as described above, the virus is not available, and its RNA cannot be available either. Therefore, sequencing is not possible. Hence, sequencing of the virus or its RNA has never been done. Saying it otherwise is incorrect and deceptive.

What is being done is assembling/building short nucleic acid chains (opposite of sequencing) based on a pre-conceived template (called primers). The obtained short chains are then extended to longer chains using computer software and modeling, naming them as RNAs of the viruses or their variants. The technical name of this process is PCR or Polymerase Chain Reaction.

It is like, one is given some beads of four colors and asked to build imaginary necklaces. Then, the experts assemble necklaces, name them viruses or variants, and call this assembly step (incorrectly) sequencing!

Therefore, claims of RNA sequencing are scientifically inaccurate, and actual sequencing has never been done.

The covid tests do not detect viruses or variants. Instead, they detect chemicals/molecules, called RNAs and (spike) proteins, presumed, not shown, to be part of the SARS-COV-2 virus. These RNA and protein molecules can come from many different sources, including the body’s cell degradations, food one consumes, or bacteria. Unfortunately, medical experts assume that these chemicals come from the virus, and tests indicate that. This lack of understanding comes from the fact that the testing belongs to the subject of chemical science (analytical chemistry), not medical training. Hence false claims are being made for describing and interpreting the tests for viruses, variants, illnesses, or infections.

An analogy may further explain the current bizarre situation regarding the PCR test, which is considered the gold standard. The test is conducted by spiking/seeding the sample with the desired chemical molecule (RNA fragment of an imaginary RNA, called primer) to make it look like the test sample has an expected or wanted RNA or virus. However, it is an entirely invalid scientific practice.

It is like conducting a pregnancy test by spiking/seeding the urine or blood sample, with a small amount of pregnancy indicating chemical compound, to assess the pregnancy. Believe it or not, everyone, including men, can potentially be tested positive for pregnancy if desired.

The Rapid/Antigen test is based on a similar principle as PCR. But, the irony is that Rapid tests are authenticated by comparing against the PCR test (the invalid test), not the virus. So, the invalidity of the Rapid/Antigen test is multiplied.

Enjoy your life, do not waste it by judging it based on a fraudulent PCR/Rapid/Antigen test.

Further detail here (1, 2)

Since the beginning of 2020, Public healthcare has taken a paradigm shift from Evidence-based clinical practice to one of hypothesis/opinion based pandemic dependent clinical practices. Driven by misinformation, coercion, and conflict of interests from the globally unelected bodies like WHO, CDC, NIH, FDA, and country-wise health and welfare institutions. All this is fueled by the will full blindness and an act of survival by the guardians of healthcare – the healthcare professionals.

The pandemic was primarily driven by testing and positivity, not the threat of illness and fatality (which was less than 0.5%). Therefore it never qualified for any kind of emergency use authorization interventions (either novel drugs or vaccination). 

All cause morbidity and mortality rates were falsely escalated by relating them to PCR positivity, not those related to respiratory failure (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ARDS). No proof was established through autopsies and direct evidence of viral dissemination. In fact, mandates of lockdowns and reduced access to critical care resulted in higher fatality rates of those with preexisting illnesses.

The helplessness of the primary care, overwhelmed state of emergency care physicians, and the misinformation about the threat to the global population (promoted by the MSM and political leadership) was conveniently utilized to bring the under-development vaccine as a holy grail.

Once this was established, the testing was conveniently disowned under the pretext of mass vaccination and the emergence of variants.

The emergence of variants story was so created to mask the failure of the vaccine to stop the transmission ( keeping alive the mandate of vaccination to reduce the severity of illness instead of transmission). The concept of Absolute risk reduction (the real clinical endpoint) was conveniently replaced by relative risk reduction anyway during initial clinical trials, which in itself is a fraudulent way of endorsing the efficacy of the vaccine.

Later in 2021, the story of insufficient vaccine response (by falsely measuring the unwanted systemic antibodies) was carried out to propose the need for boosters.

Our concerns surfaced when the rate of all-cause morbidities and mortalities increased post-vaccination period (among the vaccinated). An attempt to negate these concerns was fueled by bringing in the phenomenon of long covid cases.

Further, our concerns were raised when the vaccine mandate was extended to the younger adults and children.

The likely lifetime injuries, those observed in the older and younger adult population, remain an existential threat.

Those include hypercoagulation, cardiovascular complications, neurological diseases, higher propensity to cancer, reproductive disorders, and developmental disorders in the newborn.

The plausible mechanisms are hyperinflammation, dysfunctional immune reactions, and organ damage caused by an unknown entity in the vaccine. 

Dr. C. Kannan Janakiraman
Consultant & Patient Advocate
Integrative medicine & Functional Nutrition
Signmed Wellness Clinic
#913, Ess Emm Square,
2nd D cross, 1st Block HRBR Layout,
Kalyan nagar
Bengaluru 560043
Karnataka state, INDIA
Tel: +91 809 587 3684 / 914 131 9546
skype: cjanakir
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ckannanjanakiraman/

Have you heard the good news?

“Today the Government of Canada announced the removal of all COVID-19 entry restrictions, as well as testing, quarantine, and isolation requirements for anyone entering Canada, effective October 1, 2022.” https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/news/2022/09/government-of-canada-to-remove-covid-19-border-and-travel-measures-effective-october-1.html

I hope the next step would be stopping the vaccination, which has no need or relevance to COVID-19, as it has been developed WITHOUT testing against the virus. (https://bioanalyticx.com/claims-of-vaccines-relevancy-and-efficacy-a-big-fat-lie/).

President Joe Biden said he believes the Covid-19 pandemic is “over” in an appearance on CBS’ “60 Minutes” (link).

Arguably, this declaration is about two and a half years late and caused enormous damage to society from health, economic, and social perspectives. The actual science suggested this way earlier (in May 2020, link). It is hoped that in the future, medical experts will follow the actual science, not the fake or made-up one practiced by the authorities such as FDA and CDC.

Worth reading it (1, 2).

Hallucination, artistry, and fake-science

The above is a factually and scientifically accurate description – end of the debate. No more arguments, please. Because no one has shown:

  • A specimen of the isolated and purified virus
  • A sample of the sequenced RNA from the virus.
  • Test validation (authentication) report of the virus and/or its sequenced RNA.
  • Effectiveness of vaccines against (killing or neutralizing) the virus

Medical authorities, including from CDC and FDA, are as ignorant as anyone else about the scientific aspect of the virus and have made stupid and fraudulent claims, e.g., considering virus isolate (gunk) as pure/isolated virus.

The critical point is that most, if not all, virus-related matters are chemistry-based, and medical and biological professionals lack the needed knowledge and expertise to realize their errors. That is why they, even critical ones, have not successfully challenged or debunked the virus story.

Therefore, an independent third-party, not peer, review of the (scientific) claims is urgently needed to address the pandemic, vaccination situation, and, more importantly, the future of illnesses and medicines development business.

Further details (1, 2, 3, 4, and more).

In the article (link), Mr. Steve Kirsch (author of the article) describes Dr. Martin Kulldorff as a “Vaccine Scientist.” Is he (Dr. Kulldorff) a vaccine scientist? Has he worked with vaccines or the virus (its isolation or testing)? Not really. As per Dr. Kulldrorff’s CV, he is a statistician and epidemiologist (sub-class of statistics). So, why is he considered a scientist?

A scientist concerning virus or virology is a person who has extensive experience in the area, most importantly isolation and characterization of the virus and potentially linking the virus to the illness or at least to the body or its fluids. Dr. Kulldorff’s expertise shows nothing in this respect. So considering him, a scientist is not a valid claim but a misrepresentation of his work or academic involvement.

A statistician or epidemiologist interprets the claim made by a scientist about the GIVEN results/data obtained from scientific/laboratory work, i.e., what are the chances of the correctness of the interpretation (not the results/data) to be statistically true?

A virus has never been isolated, its test or testing has never been validated, and there cannot be a treatment (vaccine) for a non-existing thing. So, from a scientific perspective, one cannot assess the vaccine’s good (efficacy) or bad (adverse) effect. Saying it otherwise is simply a lie or fraud.

The best one can say is observing (observational/survey data noted in the article) the effects of the injection, presumably a mixture (soup/gunk) of unknown components. One of the components is mRNA, a chemical compound that could potentially be dangerous or lethal. The danger comes from the fact that mRNA is similar in chemical structure and characteristics to the body’s DNA. There is always a possibility that mRNA gets substituted into the body’s DNA.

It is like lead toxicity, where lead ions replace similar bi-valent metals such as zinc, calcium, and iron, vital for body nourishment and survival, hence toxicity or lethality. So considering that mRNA would not interfere with the body’s RNA or DNA is a very unscientific (dumb) claim, especially when no such experimental evaluation has been done. A true scientist would not make such unsubstantiated claims.

Science requires that an experimental or laboratory study be conducted to evaluate the side effects of the mRNA. In that case, it may be done by injecting pure mRNA, which presumably should be available as it is synthetic material prepared in the laboratory or “factory.” Unfortunately, such a study has never been done. Therefore, no statistical or epidemiological assessment or claims can be valid or relevant.

So, science or scientists are nowhere to be found like the virus, but only the claims – be careful about the claims.

For further details, please follow the links (1, 2)

A few days ago, FDA responded, as a final response, to my citizen petition submitted on October 2, 2018, by denying the petition.

The response acknowledges the flaws in FDA requirements, as highlighted in the petition. However, unfortunately, the petition was denied based on irrelevant discussion and arguments on method development and validation, not on apparatuses/testers validation – the subject of the petition [link].

The petition stated that “… as per cGMP requirements every equipment, including apparatuses/testers, used for drug product manufacturing and evaluation must be validated [e.g. see 6-8] to demonstrate that the equipment or testers are qualified and validated for the intended use and purpose. However, the drug dissolution testers have never been validated for their intended use.“

In the response from the FDA, denying the petition after almost 4-years of wait or study, it is stated that “Method validation and verification encompasses the apparatus used in the method; the apparatus is not separately validated.” Therefore, confirming that apparatuses/testers are not validated, i.e., FDA (product quality) requirements are based on non-validated apparatus or testers. It infers that all methods developed using such testers and the results obtained have to be non-validated – null and void.

The 7-page FDA response covers the method validation explanation, which is separate from the apparatuses/tester validation and irrelevant to the petition’s requested action.

It is critically important to note that qualification (or “qualified tester”) represents only the physical appearance of the item, e.g., any fishing hook would qualify as a tow truck hook. However, validation establishes the relevance and usefulness of the item for the intended purpose. Therefore, a fishing hook may be qualified but not be considered validated for the intended use. The validation step can only be conducted under actual use conditions, where the fishing hook will fail to perform the towing.

Similarly, an FDA/USP dissolution tester may be qualified for dissolution testing, like a fishing hook for towing. However, the tester’s validation (relevancy and applicability) can only be established using an actual physical sample of a drug product for human use, which has never been done. So, in layman’s language, current dissolution testers are equivalent (“qualified”) to tow trucks with fishing hooks.

As noted above, cGMP (current Good Manufacturing Practices) requires the apparatuses and tester to be qualified and validated before use. Unfortunately, the FDA/USP dissolution testers have never been validated (as acknowledged by the FDA in the petition response). Therefore, they do not meet the cGMP requirements. Hence these testers must not be used or recommended for pharmaceutical product evaluation. Otherwise, it amounts to scientific fraud, as explained here.

So, to conclude, FDA requirements for assessing the quality of products using the drug dissolution technique are based on non-validated apparatuses and testers, not in line with FDA’s cGMP requirements. Their use is a clear example of stark incompetence and ignorance of the science of testing/testers and its validation at the FDA/USP. An independent third-party audit in this regard is urgently needed.

Such an independent third-party audit will also help in correcting the error made by regulatory authorities (CDC and FDA) in using non-validated (PCR and Rapid Antigen) tests for the COVID-19 virus (SARS-COV-2) assessments (see here).