Clinical trials – misrepresentation of science

People do not realize that “clinical trials” are a form of (analytical) testing for medicine development and assessment, i.e., it is a fancy name for testing. But, scientifically, the current practice of clinical trials is as valid as the world-known fraudulent PCR testing and other related (Rapid test/antibody test, etc.). However, for a test to be valid, one requires a reference standard (in this case, the virus) that is unavailable. Hence, all the testing and results (cases, pandemics, waves) become irrelevant and fraudulent.

Similarly, conducting clinical trials requires appropriate treatment testing, including for vaccines against an illness, in this case, the virus or patient with illness/virus, and none is available. Hence, it is impossible to conduct relevant and scientifically valid clinical trials. Therefore, relevant clinical trials for COVID-19 have NEVER been done – it is not an opinion but a (scientific) fact.

It could be argued that the medical community and experts are aware of this weakness and fraud. So, the approach is to move to the next level to hide the fraud. In this case, clinical trials (which could not be conducted) are conducted with arbitrary and unrelated markers such as (RNA, PCR-positive/negative, antibody, variant, etc.) to fool people that science is being followed. It should be understood that science has never been followed in the COVID-19 case. Again, it is not an opinion but a scientific fact.

Everything is based on a biased “peer (buddy) review system,” not on an independent third party or scientific review. Hence, in the future, some system needs to implement for critical evaluation of testing and medicine/vaccine development and assessment. It is of utmost importance to note that testing and product development, including vaccines, do not fall in the area of practice of medicine. Unfortunately, it has been misplaced, and a change is urgently needed (1, 2)

Related Posts