Most do not realize that this, in reality, is the “modern” approach to defining and monitoring diseases. The medical experts need some serious soul searching on this aspect. Furthermore, they promote their approach is scientific or science-based. However, it is far from it! It is to be noted that medical institutions do not teach science or provide training in scientific research but in the practice of medicines, hence resulting in enormous confusion and misunderstanding about the subject and science.
Alec Zeck of The Way Forward hosts a live summit to dissect and debunk the monkey business surrounding both Monkeypox and the theory of pathogenic viruses at large. (video recording link)
or convenience, start times of the prensations are provided below if one likes to jump to a particular speaker.
(TOM COWAN @ 0:1:30), (SAM BAILEY @ 0:8:41), (MIKE STONE @ 0:10:45), (ANDY KAUFMAN @ 0:31:13), CHRISTINE MASSEY @ 0:49:13), (MARK BAILEY @ 0:58:21), (KEVIN CORBETT @ 1:01:17 ), (SAEED QURESHI @ 1:19:00), ( ERIC COPPOLINO @1:29:00), (AMANDHA VOLLMER @ 1:41:49), (Q&A @ 1:50:50)
Disinformation:
There is a virus-based pandemic (Link)
There is a virus (SARS-COV-2) (Link)
There is a test for the virus (Link)
The virus has been isolated (Link)
The RNA/virus has been sequenced (Link)
The spike protein is real and from the virus (Link).
The vaccines, including mRNA, have been tested against the virus (Link)
The vaccines are effective against the virus and protect people (Link)
There is evidence that face-mask and social distance provide protection (Link)
Lockdown can stop the spread of the virus (Link)
Physicians are trained in the science of isolation and identification of viruses (Link)
Science has been followed (Link)
Prove it wrong!
Just like SARS-COV-2, monkeypox does not have a test either. So, there is no way it can be detected, monitored, or “confirmed” by (PCR) testing. Please do not argue; it is not an opinion but a scientific fact. link
Researcher: ‘We Made a Big Mistake’ on COVID-19 Vaccine Article
The science clearly indicated a flawed and poor assessment of the mRNA vaccine and its dangers, which were described and predicted at the early stage of the vaccine’s development and introduction. See here. It was published on PSI as well (link)
The article makes an even bigger mistake: associating a protein (spike protein) with a nonexisting virus, i.e., rationalizing and justifying a nonexistent virus/illness and a “treatment” for it. ((link)).
It is controlled opposition, desperately trying to save the “science” and professions of viruses/medicines. However, I think they are dead now or will soon!
It is now obvious that two opposite views exist concerning the COVID-19 pandemic:
(1) the official one, supported mainly by physicians and related establishments, believes that the virus and the pandemic are real;
(2) the rest, mostly scientists, including some physicians and alternative medicine practicing groups, believe that the virus story is unscientific and a hoax.
However, as views held by both sides remain strong, the question is which view be considered correct and be followed. Until it is not decided which view is correct, it is impossible to address the virus and pandemic situation, and such cannot be stopped or avoided in the future. This article provides a discussion to address the issue by critically evaluating the handling of the issue by medical practitioners and establishments. Continue here
In short, test development and validation are separate expertise and are not part of the medical curriculum or training. The so-called virus, infection, and pandemic results from false and scientifically invalid testing. So, please, keep this thought in mind when seeking an opinion about testing from medical experts (1, 2).
The issue is that most of the pandemic descriptions/predictions are based on epidemiology which is not per se a science subject but a statistical data analysis routine. Epidemiologists use the data and assumptions provided to them by others, such as laboratories, to make predictions.
Unfortunately, they are often unaware of the relevancy and accuracy of the test used and/or the data obtained from the test – the PCR test in point. They have no idea that the test assumptions and procedures are flawed or corrupted. Therefore, their predictions are usually grossly inaccurate and unpredictable, as observed with the COVID-19 pandemic. Hence they should not be considered an authority on the COVID-19 until the testing choice and procedure are corrected.
The epidemiologists believe in the PCR test and that it is a relevant and accurate test and is telling about the virus – that is the problem. The problem can only be resolved by recognizing that testing and its data are false. Who would do that – not the epidemiologists or the medical experts, only the testing scientists such as analytical chemists, as an example? Hence, the false pandemic will continue for a while.