Author: Dr. Saeed Qureshi, Ph.D.

Post Views: 13

Have you ever wondered why most medicines are kept behind the counters, obtainable through prescriptions only, and sold by pharmacists only, while the products are approved by authorities such as the FDA, Health Canada, and others as safe and effective?

The reality is that they have never been shown appropriately safe and effective but are only presumed to be by the authorities. In general, physicians and pharmacists do not know this either. They also assume that the authorities have (scientifically) tested and validated the claims of safety and effectiveness. They do not. No one does! The debacle of COVID-19 and vaccines has provided glaring proof, which I  have been trying to tell for at least 20 years. Continue here

Post Views: 5

Is This Vax Really Adulterated per Kirsch/Bridle/McKernan? (link)

Below is my view on the topic.

@ “Is This Vax Really Adulterated … “

There is no way to find out because no pure or unadulterated one is available. Why?

Rituals are often followed in medical/pharmaceutical practice (“science”), and things get declared based on a sellable story with some scientific-sounding jargon.

It is like a gain of function (GOF) research. Scientifically and logically, the first step is to show the baseline/reference, i.e., the original version (“virus”), followed by the tampered one, a variant or modified (link).

However, the “original virus” has never been shown, but the tampered ones have been described. Why? It promotes and maintains the non-existent “virus” story as if it is something real.

Similarly, some have started discussing adulterated (tampered) vaccines while no vaccine (unadulterated/reference) is available. It is just junk in the vial, without any control or defined content to make the story believable that an actual vaccine exists.

Note that I wrote earlier, even before the vaccine development, that it is impossible to develop a vaccine, and indeed, there is no vaccine (unadulterated or adulterated), just false claims. (link).

Obtain a copy of Helpful Notes to learn about the misunderstanding of the science behind the viruses/vaccines/pharmaceuticals (link).

Post Views: 35

A medical degree, such as M.D., is like any other four or 5-year undergraduate non-science degree. It does not provide training in science, such as for isolation, purification, and characterization or identification of substances or chemicals/medicines, which led the experts to make and believe in false conclusions that the virus exists and has been isolated.

Moreover, developing a treatment (such as a vaccine) also belongs to the experimental science subject, which requires testing the treatments against the target, such as a virus or illness. Unfortunately, lack of science and training led the experts to make false claims that treatment has been developed, while it is scientifically impossible and illogical to make such a claim. No virus (or its sample) is available to test and develop the treatment. Injecting unknown and unpurified gunk (so-called “vaccines”) in humans resulted in devastating outcomes (adverse effects without any benefit).

It is a textbook case of incompetency and ignorance—an example set for many generations to come. The only solution to address the colossal failure is to stop believing in the virus and vaccinations. Arrogance is the hindrance that needs to be addressed.

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.

Post Views: 31

About the view that vaccine(s) may include some type of DNA targeting, I responded as follows:

Being a chemist/scientist all my life, and mainly in the pharmaceutical area, when I read about pharmaceuticals, including viruses and vaccines, it is evident to me that medical experts clearly describe chemistry in a glorified and catchy language. However, most of their claims do not make sense and are often false and fraudulent.

You mentioned “DNA targeting.” yes, indeed, this is possible, but is it happening? I seriously doubt it. If medical/pharmaceutical experts cannot isolate a virus, RNA, or spike protein, they cannot (not capable) of working with DNA targeting, as assumed. So, it is fancy language to impress that something (high-level “science”) is happening.

On the other hand, as I described (here and here), it looks like they are injecting partial or unpurified cell culture (as a “vaccine”), assuming it is mRNA and is causing the problems (adverse effects), including deaths.

The only and easiest/quickest way to find out is to get an audit done by experts with experience in isolation/purification to establish if the mRNA/vaccine is pure as described or junk.

However, in the current (regulatory) system, an audit is done by experts who have no or limited experience in isolation and purification and have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, so they will provide fancy stories and seek more funding for “research” to prepare for next “pandemic” and “vaccine.”

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.

Post Views: 14

The mRNA vaccine’s lack of usefulness and severe adverse effects have generally been recognized (e.g., see link), which I accurately predicted at the pandemic’s beginning, even before the vaccine’s introduction (link).

The basis of this prediction was that proper vaccine clinical trials (for safety and efficacy assessment) would require pure and isolated virus specimens and a valid test to monitor it. Both were missing; therefore, the appropriate vaccine could not be developed.

There is a trend in highlighting the toxicity of the mRNA vaccine linking to various components, e.g., spike-protein and DNA/RNA contamination (link, link).

 If one reads the articles critically, it should be evident that these are typical biology/virology narratives (fairy tales) presented as science, like claiming the existence of the virus, with heavily worded scientific jargon.

Sorry, the described narratives are unrelated to science or the issue. It is a narrative to continue to promote the virus and mRNA vaccine theory/philosophy and, more importantly, seek more funding for “science research” to find the source of impurity/contamination, which they will never find. Why? Because they are dealing with chemicals (vaccines, RNAs, proteins) manufacturing and their isolation and purification, a subject (chemistry) most experts involved have limited or no knowledge of, including the authorities such as the FDA and CDC.

 As I described in my recent articles (here and here), the people (including “scientists”) assume they are dealing with mRNA, but in fact, it is not mRNA but selectively concentrated filth from bacterial culture (labeled as “vaccine”). The isolation and purification of mRNA or vaccines (and its quality controls) can only be established using validated tests that do not exist.

So, read such articles cautiously, and to address the cause of the lack of efficacy and adverse effects, consult knowledgeable subject experts with experience in isolating and purifying substances. In the meantime, ask for stopping the vaccination (preferably all vaccines) by an independent third (non-medical) to complete an appropriate analysis of the products and to further prevent the tragedy of vaccination. May Almighty save us all from this witchcraft that currently is in practice.

Post Views: 10

I will not make many friends and will annoy many others, but the truth or reality has to be told, known, and understood, i.e.,

Listening and seeking advice from medical experts, such as physicians,  about medicine developments and manufacturing and working of medicines (or science in general) is like asking an ice cream vendor about cattle farming or dairy product manufacturing. The same applies to diagnostic testing, i.e., their development, validation, and interpretation.

The pandemic and its link to the virus and vaccine developments have been created by the medical experts’ lack of knowledge or ignorance about the science. Consider learning the actual science that has thoroughly been violated in this regard. It is not that difficult to learn and understand if one ignores the scientifically sounding jargon published in the medical and pharmaceutical literature.

People, including experts, must realize that the thinking that created the problem cannot solve it.

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.

Post Views: 11

I responded to someone on the topic of virus shedding. I thought my response would be helpful for the visitors here, as well.

Both sides of the physicians (for and against the virus/shedding) use the literature in support of their argument. However, the literature is incorrect because it is based on the assumption of the existence of the virus.

A few things discussed about the virus/virology are spike protein, RNA, DNA, mRNA, the virus (a composite of protein and RNA), and vaccines (a composite of assumed mRNA and other ingredients). The described literature is based on these items, which are chemicals in nature.

It should be evident that people should consult and follow chemists to learn about these things. Why do people follow physicians and seek advice about the chemicals from them when it is known that they are not knowledgeable in chemistry/science to the extent needed to explain these things?

I am a chemist who has worked in the area for over 35+ years. Seeing the chemical descriptions and narratives in the medical/pharmaceutical literature tells me everything written is nonsense and garbage.

Why – because when the claims are made about the compounds/chemicals (noted above), the simple fact is that they must be available in a physical form, isolated, purified, and fully characterized. Period – no question asked!

However, the literature does not provide any evidence of the existence of the noted compounds or their composites (showing pictures of SOUP (GUNK) is not scientific evidence of their existence). Hence, nothing is real—neither the virus, vaccine, testing nor their shedding. Enjoy your God-given life to its fullest without fear. Do not distance away from your loved ones and those who care about you.

This is the best I can say. I hope this will be helpful.

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.

Post Views: 14

It is critical to note that all published literature on virology/virus (“scientific journals”) be considered discredited because it is based on claims that studies/experiments have been done using the virus when the virus has never been shown to exist and/or used in the studies.

Studies have generally used isolates/lysates, not viruses (or variants), but unknown impure soups (gunk). There is no evidence that the gunk contains a virus: a fatal misunderstanding of medical/pharmaceutical experts.

From the scientific perspective, all claims about the viruses or their variants should be considered false and fake, along with associated claims for the treatments, including vaccines.

Please stop promoting testing, viruses, and vaccines; nothing is real. They are harming the public and nations gravely.

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.