The article (link) that was brought to my attention describes the views of two prominent doctors on the virus and the COVID-19 aspects, notably their isolation and characterization.
In short, there is nothing new here. It is just repeating false claims about the virus and its isolation. It is clear that the authors do not understand the underlying science, thus making numerous invalid and false claims. For example:
Continue here
Different doctors suggest different chemicals (cleverly named as medicines/treatments), such as mRNA vaccine, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, etc., to address the issue (symptoms/infections) of COVID-19. The claims of the effectiveness of these chemicals are based on studies (implying “scientific or experimental studies”) often published in “scientific” journals. However, from critical and logical considerations, these studies and claims are not scientific – as no virus or infection is available for testing or developing treatments. Testing a virus or its infection requires a valid test that is unavailable and cannot be developed until a physical virus sample is available [1]. Hence, all claims of testing, viruses, or treatments are scientifically fake and false.
(more…)
Someone asked how to address the issues with medicines and related medical (doctors’) sciences.
I suggest moving the chemicals-based (allopathic) medicines away from doctors and pharmacists, including all testing (diagnostic or otherwise). They are doing chemists’ work without relevant training and education, making disastrous blunders and ruining people’s health. The subject has to be managed by appropriately educated and experienced scientists/chemists. All development, manufacturing, testing, approval, and marketing of medicines/chemicals must be guided by chemistry experts.
Doctors should provide the service they are trained for, i.e., they should provide standardized prescriptions by observing symptoms and clinical test results. They should not claim to be science experts or scientists or be involved in scientific (experimental) research.
I commented on an article. I think the comment would also be helpful to the visitors of this blog.
@ “They are science, as best as I know it.” How? (link)
The question is which science is being followed here – presumably epidemiology. Epidemiology is “the branch of medicine which deals with the incidence, distribution, and possible control of diseases and other factors relating to health.” (link)
It means it is part of medicine. Sorry to say it, but science is not part of the training or learning of medicines. For example, an M.D. (Doctor of Medicine) is a standard non-science undergraduate degree. Therefore, epidemiology should not be considered a science subject or part of it. (link).
In general, epidemiology depends on the interpretation and/or outcome of diagnosis/testing from the medical area. For example, in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, the whole story revolves around PCR testing, which by any standard is a fake and fraudulent test, i.e., it has no link to the virus (SARS-COV-2), illness (COVID-19) or mRNA (vaccine development). Hence, all interpretations, including those by epidemiology, will be presumptions or opinion-based, not scientific or factual.
The actual science of medicine is chemistry, particularly analytical chemistry (link). Please consider this.
A medical degree such as an M.D. (Doctor of Medicine) is a standard undergraduate non-science degree without any training in experimental/laboratory science or research in medicines (chemicals). The science and research aspect must be conducted under the guidance of experts in chemical science (chemistry) to be valid. From a scientific perspective, the virus, virology, pandemic, (PCR) tests, and vaccines (all are chemical-based) can easily and quickly be established as fake and fraudulent.
People will not believe it, but it is true and a fact that universities hardly teach about medicines and science for a Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) degree.
More astonishing is that academia promotes doctors as (medicine/chemical) science experts or “scientists” without teaching them about the science of medicine (chemistry). No wonder the mRNA vaccine resulted in such a disastrous blunder and an extreme tragedy. It is a tragedy of ignorance and incompetence.
A doctor’s role as a science expert or researcher must be stopped immediately, as it is a fraud. Doctors should only practice what they are trained to do, i.e., hearing/watching the symptoms, seeking relevant test results, and then writing up matching prescriptions from memory or through Google.
Medical professionals are among the least educated and knowledgeable about science. Prove me wrong!
