Category: Vaccine

Seeking advice from physicians on medications, including vaccines, is not the issue. They are trained for that purpose—mainly to prescribe medicines as needed. It is no different from asking the front-end clerk at an auto shop for advice about a car part or a potential issue with your car. Their role is functional, not foundational.

The real problem begins when physicians are assumed to understand how medicines are developed, how they actually work, or how they are manufactured. They do not. That knowledge belongs to science—specifically chemistry, a discipline with centuries of rigorous foundations.

Medicines are chemicals. Their discovery, testing, and production are properly the domain of chemistry, not medicine. Physicians are not scientists, and when they speak as though they are, their claims are misleading at best and fraudulent at worst. For this reason, anyone without training in science and chemistry should be excluded from directing or conducting scientific research.

This confusion has fueled dangerous misconceptions and harmful developments. Viruses, vaccines, PCR tests, antibody tests, and countless diagnostic products have been falsely presented under the banner of “medical science.” But there is no such thing as “medical science.” Medicine is a practice of prescribing and administering treatments; science—real science—belongs to chemistry and physics.

Allowing physicians to lead in areas where they have no true expertise has led to repeated disasters. The narratives surrounding viruses, infections, and even cancer—promoted as if grounded in science—are, in fact, constructs built on fragile foundations. These practices have not delivered genuine medical benefits; instead, they have imposed massive harm on public health and drained societal wealth.

The solution is clear: separate medicine from science. Let doctors prescribe, but let scientists—true scientists—develop and evaluate the treatments. Only then can society avoid the cycle of fraud, fear, and failure that has shaped the modern “medical science” – the fake and false one.

I listened to Dr. Bret Weinstein’s response to Piers Morgan’s question in this 1:34-minute video clip and noted several errors or unsupported claims (link). For example:

He stated: “… in an effort to provide immunity against COVID-19 …”

There is no scientifically valid evidence that COVID-19 exists. It is a belief that COVID-19 is caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2. However, there is no evidence that this virus has ever been shown to exist. Therefore, a disease attributed to this virus cannot exist.

Dr. Weinstein is an evolutionary biologist or biology expert, not in the true sense of the word a scientist—particularly in the field of substance isolation and characterization, like viruses. That domain belongs to science proper, specifically chemistry, not biology. Hence, not only is he making a false statement, but he may not even realize it. He should reconsider his position on this topic.

(more…)

Propaganda and marketing have been so pervasive that the public and public leadership have come to genuinely believe that physicians possess complete knowledge of medicines— chemicals and their interactions (chemical reactions), and also related health care in general. They are presented as all-knowing authorities who carry the full understanding of illness and treatment processes in their back pocket, armed with “modern science” and the limits of human intelligence and capability.

This image of expertise is carefully constructed in different areas, such as:

(more…)

I have written several articles on PCR for my blog, but it seems many readers may not have understood them fully. So, here is another attempt to explain.

PCR stands for Polymerase Chain Reaction. Breaking it down, polymerase is a combination of two parts: polymer and -ase. Polymers are chemical compounds that can come from natural or synthetic sources. Examples of natural polymers include cellulose, starch, glycogen, proteins, enzymes, and nucleic acids such as DNA and RNA, while synthetic polymers include polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, PVC, Teflon, and nylon. All of these substances are well-characterized, certified, and widely available, mostly from chemical suppliers.

The suffix “-ase” indicates an enzyme, a protein that acts as a catalyst in biochemical reactions. For instance, hydrogen and oxygen will not combine to form water on their own; a spark or catalyst is required to initiate the reaction. Similarly, in biological systems, enzymes trigger countless reactions essential for life.

(more…)

Question Asked:

Are particles like urea in urine, sugar in blood, and bacteria in blood different from what we call “viruses”?

Response:


Urea, sugar, bacteria, and enzymes can all be detected, identified, and even purified with relative ease. These are real, demonstrable substances. I avoid using the term particles here because “particle” refers to a physical state that may or may not be observable under all conditions. For example, table salt exists as particles in solid form, but when dissolved in water, its particulate state disappears, forming ions—yet it is still considered salt. However, sand exists as particles almost all the time, even when mixed with water. The important point is that these substances are tangible, measurable, and their testing is valid.

(more…)

Yesterday, I watched a documentary (Premiere: Inside mRNA Vaccines), about an hour long, which tells a troubling story that deserves wider attention (link). I highly recommend watching it. From my perspective, the so-called medical experts featured in the film largely rely on theoretical assertions disconnected from reality and genuine science. Their artwork (labelled “science”) is no different than animation shown in the movie. They continue to promote their version of “science” to explain mRNA technology — yet there is little to no actual technological or scientific substance behind their claims.

(more…)

After accurately predicting the non-existence of the virus, the fraudulent PCR test, and the fake vaccine, it is time for the next prediction: a safe and effective vaccine — universal or otherwise — is impossible to develop.

Without a clearly defined and measurable illness, along with validated methods for diagnosing and treating it (such as with a vaccine), there is no possibility of creating any genuine vaccine. The tests lack a proper reference, and without it, the entire framework collapses.

Medical and pharmaceutical “science” (pure nonsense) along with its associated scientists, will be remembered not for true science or progress, but for one of the greatest scientific frauds in history — a lie we have endured at a massive cost to both health and wealth.

This is not guesswork or opinion, but a conclusion drawn from the principles and practice of actual science — chemistry.

What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)

The U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have recently announced what they are calling a “next-generation, universal vaccine platform.” The project, branded Generation Gold Standard, is being promoted as a major leap forward in vaccine science and safety assessment. Public figures, including RFK Jr., have spoken about it as if it were the solution to the failures of the COVID-19 vaccines — the dawn of a new, “safe and effective” vaccine era.

Before accepting these claims, it is worth examining them from the standpoint of actual science — specifically chemistry — to assess the validity of the approach and the likelihood of success (more like its failure).

(more…)

The medical community has a new trick. After decades of virus-vaccine failure, fraud, and public harm, some doctors are now rebranding under terrain theory. See the recent article by Richard Z. Cheng, M.D., Ph.D. (Editor-in-Chief, Orthomolecular Medicine News Service) promoting it (link). The motive is obvious: the virus narrative has collapsed under its own lies, so they need a new story to keep the funding flowing.

Now they pitch terrain theory as a “new” scientific model — and are already calling for funding to run clinical trials comparing vaccine-based vs. terrain-based strategies. This is audacious. After decades of massive funding, they’ve delivered nothing but damage. Before they get another cent, they must account for their record: not progress, but failure on a historic scale.

(more…)

A Facebook follower recently brought this article (link) associated with Dr. Stefano Scoglio to my attention and asked for my thoughts. I’ve heard of Dr. Scoglio and his work before and have looked into it to some extent. However, this article provides a clearer overview of his views, particularly regarding the ongoing scientific critique of viruses, vaccines, and transfection technologies. As a microbiologist, Dr. Scoglio presents his perspective from a biological standpoint, offering valuable insight from within that domain.

That said, I must clarify that I do not regard biology — as it’s commonly practiced — to be a true science (link). In this case, one of the article’s subheadings is particularly striking: “When Biology Meets Physics: The Transfection Paradox.” It’s unclear whether this title originated from Dr. Scoglio or the article’s author, but either way, it’s deeply problematic. Why invoke physics when discussing proteins, mRNA, and complex biochemical interactions — all of which clearly belong to the domain of chemistry?

(more…)