Category: Vaccine

It is essential to note that biology is not a science, nor is it a science subject. Biology more closely aligns with the arts—similar to fields like psychology, sociology, or economics—drawing heavily on observation, interpretation, and speculative theorizing rather than direct experimentation with physical substances. In this framework, biology constructs narratives based on observed patterns and inferred mechanisms, rather than engaging with empirically verifiable entities.

For example, concepts like viruses and the diseases attributed to them must be viewed as theoretical (imaginary), rather than physically demonstrated realities. On the other hand, science (physics and chemistry, link) is concerned only with tangible substances. As the physical samples of the isolated and purified viruses are not available, claims about viruses and their illnesses cannot be considered science-based or scientific, but biological (non-scientific).

As medical practice and research heavily or solely depend on biology, it should also be considered a non-science discipline. Therefore, all claims by medical experts, particularly physicians, in medical research areas concerning diagnosis and their treatments, including vaccines, should be regarded as false and fraudulent from a scientific perspective.

After Years of Silence, New CDC Vaccine Panel to Vote on Mercury in Flu Shots (link)

Consider the credentials of the new ACIP membership. The eight new members are, according to Kennedy: (link)

  • Dr. Joseph R. Hibbeln, a psychiatrist and neuroscientist with a career in clinical research, public health policy, and federal service.
  • Martin Kulldorff, M.D., Ph.D., a biostatistician and epidemiologist formerly at Harvard Medical School and a leading expert in vaccine safety and infectious disease surveillance.
  • Retsef Levi, Ph.D., professor of operations management at the MIT Sloan School of Management and a leading expert in healthcare analytics, risk management, and vaccine safety.
  • Dr. Robert W. Malone, a physician-scientist and biochemist known for his early contributions to mRNA vaccine technology.
  • Dr. Cody Meissner, professor of Pediatrics at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and a nationally recognized expert in pediatric infectious diseases and vaccine policy.
  • Dr. James Pagano, a board-certified emergency medicine physician with over 40 years of clinical experience following his residency at UCLA.
  • Vicky Pebsworth, OP, Ph.D., RN, who holds a doctorate in public health and nursing from the University of Michigan.
  • Dr. Michael A. Ross, clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at George Washington University and Virginia Commonwealth University, with a career spanning clinical medicine, research, and public health policy.

It is essential to note that none of the listed credentials indicate that they would reflect science literacy. They are based on self-proclaimed sciences, i.e., without education or expertise in actual science. Such expertise caused the disaster of vaccination in the first place. It is impossible that experts with such expertise would be able to address the issue of vaccinations or other chemical-based treatments.

If the issue needs to be resolved based on science, then actual science (chemistry) experts should be appointed, as medicines, including vaccines, are chemicals or chemical-based.

Science does not require voting or consensus, but rather valid data from well-designed scientific studies conducted by experts in the field (science or chemistry).  

Science And Medical Experts – An Oil And Water Mix! (link)  
For The Attention Of Respectable RFK Jr. (United States Secretary Of HHS) (link)

Below is my response to Malcolm Glass’s comment on Facebook (link). His comment is provided at the end of my response.

Thank you very much for taking the time to evaluate my view critically and for explaining your understanding of the subject.

In short, your narrative does not accurately describe my position. Your description is similar to those who consider there is no or limited need to know or understand science to resolve the virus or virology issue. A straightforward discussion (based on so-called logic) could easily and effectively resolve the issue. No true! If that had been the case, the problem would have been resolved a long time ago.

Unfortunately, both groups (virus and non-virus) have been arguing about science (without understanding it) and have failed to resolve the issue. My view is that if one wants to discuss science, then say so. Do not hide it under the rug of logic or high school stuff.

(more…)

I started reading the article (link) but got bored after reading a few lines. I find it typical nonsensical narrative by medical professionals to sell fear to promote their “science” and products/services with convoluted and dodgy narratives.

For example, consider the first two words of the article “Antibiotic abuse.” Of course, the abuse of anything can be detrimental and must be avoided, but that does not mean it should be avoided all the time, including for its proper use. There is a definite need for antibiotics, and they have been used successfully for very long periods.

@ “According to the CDC, 2.8 million cases of antibiotic-resistant infections are diagnosed yearly, and 35,000 people die from them …” Citing the CDC claim is of limited authenticity of validity, as recently, the CDC has been under scrutiny for providing false or invalid reporting.

Next, are the narratives referring to “intrinsic resistance, acquired resistance, genetic change, DNA transfer.” These are all chemicals and chemistry/science terms, along with antibiotics, about which doctors have no knowledge or training. Therefore, it can be said with almost certainly that these are scientifically false or unproven narratives. It is like the hoopla about viruses and vaccines based on a genetic and DNA narrative, which has clearly been shown to be fraudulent.

Therefore, I suggest that medical professionals limit their practice and claims to the training and education they have received and refrain from engaging in science that has not been taught or learned – noting that a medical degree, such as M.D., is not a science degree.

An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
Unlawful Science Practices By Physicians (link)

Drs. Malone And McCullough May Like To Address This Concern (link)
It is worth noting an uncommon and unpopular fact about HHS/FDA/NIH (link)
Unlawful Science Practices By Physicians (link)
Medical Experts (doctors) And Science? (link)
The Best Example Of Controlled Opposition Yet (link)
Vaccine Science: Nonsense And BS! (link)
An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
And many more scientifically authoritative articles on the subject  by a veteran scientist who worked at Health Canada for 30 years in the pharmaceutical area  (link)

The issue is not that these experts have incredible courage or have published extensively (link), noting that medical publications have recently been discredited for their validity and accuracy (link). The problem is that they are promoting themselves and their work as experts in science or scientists. However, neither of them has scientific credentials and makes false claims in this respect. Their academic education and training are based on a medical degree, which is a typical non-science undergraduate degree (link) with no direct connection to science subjects, such as physics and chemistry (link).

Their involvement in viruses, vaccines, spike protein, and mRNA technology is a good example of claiming or working with false science. These things do not exist or have not been shown to exist (scientifically, experimentally, or physically), so how can they make claims about their problems or treatments?

They should seek help from (actual) science/chemistry experts in dealing with these substances, be it viruses, proteins, mRNA, or medicine, in general, including vaccines, which are chemicals or chemical-based in nature.

News: US stops recommending COVID shot to healthy kids, pregnant women! (link)

Strangely, such a decision is made, which does not make sense from a logical or scientific perspective. It is critically important to note that vaccines have not been tested for their safety or efficacy on any group of people (link, link).

The reason is that no SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals (patients) are available for testing (aka clinical trials); hence, safety and efficacy claims remain unfounded and fraudulent. Any claim contradictory to it must be considered false or a lie. Even physicians may not recognize this lie, as they are not trained in science to critically evaluate and understand the situation.

Therefore, such a decision may be considered purely a political one to calm the public outcry over damage caused by untested vaccines and more so to protect the false claims that medical experts are knowledgeable or trained in science. It is worth noting that the organizations mentioned above are neither science-based nor led by scientists or science experts.

Furthermore, suggesting or seeking safety studies for vaccines in the future is simply a trick to continue with false medical/virology science. Scientifically, it is impossible to conduct, as noted above, safety as well as efficacy studies, as there are no patients available (for efficacy testing) and there is no isolated, purified active ingredient (mRNA) available (for safety studies).

Please consider withdrawing all vaccine-related treatments and shutting down all the so-called medical science research and institutions and their funding. They have not provided useful or valid research for at least the past five decades, yet this has caused severe damage to public health and wealth. Please have their science audited by competent scientists, not from the medical field, but from those having a science (chemistry) background, as medicines are essentially chemicals or chemical-based.

Click on the image for the link

Perhaps the biggest lie they have convinced people, including doctors, is that doctors study and understand science. The fact is that doctors do not study or are not trained in science or scientific research. Their education and expertise are based on a typical non-science undergraduate degree (e.g., M.D.) to write prescriptions.

An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
Viruses/Vaccines: Disaster Manufactured by Medical Experts (link)
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)


The FDA Committee’s Review of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine: Unscientific, False and Deceitful (link)
COVID And Science Divergence (link)
mRNA Vaccine Is Not mRNA But Gunk – A Forensic Analysis (link)
COVID-19: The virus does not exist – it is confirmed! (link)
Vaccine Science: Nonsense And BS! (link)
An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)