Category: Virus

Is This Vax Really Adulterated per Kirsch/Bridle/McKernan? (link)

Below is my view on the topic.

@ “Is This Vax Really Adulterated … “

There is no way to find out because no pure or unadulterated one is available. Why?

Rituals are often followed in medical/pharmaceutical practice (“science”), and things get declared based on a sellable story with some scientific-sounding jargon.

It is like a gain of function (GOF) research. Scientifically and logically, the first step is to show the baseline/reference, i.e., the original version (“virus”), followed by the tampered one, a variant or modified (link).

However, the “original virus” has never been shown, but the tampered ones have been described. Why? It promotes and maintains the non-existent “virus” story as if it is something real.

Similarly, some have started discussing adulterated (tampered) vaccines while no vaccine (unadulterated/reference) is available. It is just junk in the vial, without any control or defined content to make the story believable that an actual vaccine exists.

Note that I wrote earlier, even before the vaccine development, that it is impossible to develop a vaccine, and indeed, there is no vaccine (unadulterated or adulterated), just false claims. (link).

Obtain a copy of Helpful Notes to learn about the misunderstanding of the science behind the viruses/vaccines/pharmaceuticals (link).

About the view that vaccine(s) may include some type of DNA targeting, I responded as follows:

Being a chemist/scientist all my life, and mainly in the pharmaceutical area, when I read about pharmaceuticals, including viruses and vaccines, it is evident to me that medical experts clearly describe chemistry in a glorified and catchy language. However, most of their claims do not make sense and are often false and fraudulent.

You mentioned “DNA targeting.” yes, indeed, this is possible, but is it happening? I seriously doubt it. If medical/pharmaceutical experts cannot isolate a virus, RNA, or spike protein, they cannot (not capable) of working with DNA targeting, as assumed. So, it is fancy language to impress that something (high-level “science”) is happening.

On the other hand, as I described (here and here), it looks like they are injecting partial or unpurified cell culture (as a “vaccine”), assuming it is mRNA and is causing the problems (adverse effects), including deaths.

The only and easiest/quickest way to find out is to get an audit done by experts with experience in isolation/purification to establish if the mRNA/vaccine is pure as described or junk.

However, in the current (regulatory) system, an audit is done by experts who have no or limited experience in isolation and purification and have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, so they will provide fancy stories and seek more funding for “research” to prepare for next “pandemic” and “vaccine.”

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.

I responded to someone on the topic of virus shedding. I thought my response would be helpful for the visitors here, as well.

Both sides of the physicians (for and against the virus/shedding) use the literature in support of their argument. However, the literature is incorrect because it is based on the assumption of the existence of the virus.

A few things discussed about the virus/virology are spike protein, RNA, DNA, mRNA, the virus (a composite of protein and RNA), and vaccines (a composite of assumed mRNA and other ingredients). The described literature is based on these items, which are chemicals in nature.

It should be evident that people should consult and follow chemists to learn about these things. Why do people follow physicians and seek advice about the chemicals from them when it is known that they are not knowledgeable in chemistry/science to the extent needed to explain these things?

I am a chemist who has worked in the area for over 35+ years. Seeing the chemical descriptions and narratives in the medical/pharmaceutical literature tells me everything written is nonsense and garbage.

Why – because when the claims are made about the compounds/chemicals (noted above), the simple fact is that they must be available in a physical form, isolated, purified, and fully characterized. Period – no question asked!

However, the literature does not provide any evidence of the existence of the noted compounds or their composites (showing pictures of SOUP (GUNK) is not scientific evidence of their existence). Hence, nothing is real—neither the virus, vaccine, testing nor their shedding. Enjoy your God-given life to its fullest without fear. Do not distance away from your loved ones and those who care about you.

This is the best I can say. I hope this will be helpful.

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.

It is critical to note that all published literature on virology/virus (“scientific journals”) be considered discredited because it is based on claims that studies/experiments have been done using the virus when the virus has never been shown to exist and/or used in the studies.

Studies have generally used isolates/lysates, not viruses (or variants), but unknown impure soups (gunk). There is no evidence that the gunk contains a virus: a fatal misunderstanding of medical/pharmaceutical experts.

From the scientific perspective, all claims about the viruses or their variants should be considered false and fake, along with associated claims for the treatments, including vaccines.

Please stop promoting testing, viruses, and vaccines; nothing is real. They are harming the public and nations gravely.

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.

The COVID-19 virus is claimed to be in the air (presumably everywhere); however, no evidence of its presence or existence has been provided except for computer-generated photographs. The assertion is that considering its minuscule (submicroscopic) physical size and quantities, it can only be shown with the computer or hand-drawn sketches.

Experts believe that the virus is killing people. Therefore, it (the invisible one) must be eliminated/killed to save people and humanity from dying.

The recommended treatment is mRNA (medicine, a chemical called messenger ribonucleic acid) in the form of a vaccine. The promoted mRNA’s working principle is based on producing a specific protein (spike protein) in the body to develop immunity against the virus.
It is not commonly recognized that a vaccine. Continue here

It is claimed that a new treatment approach (called mRNA vaccine) has been developed to produce proteins (called spike-protein or s-protein) to mimic COVID-19 virus attacks or infections. With the spike protein, the body’s chemistry would create antibodies to protect the body from future “actual” virus attacks or infections. However, a critical literature review indicates that no claimed mRNA exists, but isolate/culture-based gunk is being used as a vaccine, causing tremendous adverse effects.

Continue here