A Facebook follower recently brought this article (link) associated with Dr. Stefano Scoglio to my attention and asked for my thoughts. I’ve heard of Dr. Scoglio and his work before and have looked into it to some extent. However, this article provides a clearer overview of his views, particularly regarding the ongoing scientific critique of viruses, vaccines, and transfection technologies. As a microbiologist, Dr. Scoglio presents his perspective from a biological standpoint, offering valuable insight from within that domain.
That said, I must clarify that I do not regard biology — as it’s commonly practiced — to be a true science (link). In this case, one of the article’s subheadings is particularly striking: “When Biology Meets Physics: The Transfection Paradox.” It’s unclear whether this title originated from Dr. Scoglio or the article’s author, but either way, it’s deeply problematic. Why invoke physics when discussing proteins, mRNA, and complex biochemical interactions — all of which clearly belong to the domain of chemistry?
This sort of misdirection is not accidental. It reflects a deliberate avoidance of the one discipline that offers definitive, unchallengeable answers: chemistry. By sidestepping actual science, discussions are kept in the realm of vague speculation. Biology and physics, as loosely invoked here, allow for ambiguity and deception. This is precisely how the fraud of viruses and vaccines has persisted — by avoiding the rigorous standards of real science.
While many of Dr. Scoglio’s criticisms are valid, his biological reasoning can be debated. From the standpoint of true science — chemistry — the fraud becomes undeniable. The first principle of scientific inquiry is simple and non-negotiable: if you are discussing a substance (e.g., virus, spike protein, mRNA), it must first be isolated, purified, and fully characterized. This foundational step has never been achieved for any virus or its components. Without this, all subsequent claims — about function, transmission, pathology, or treatment — are either fictional or fraudulent.
Every component allegedly involved — viruses, spike proteins, mRNA — requires physical existence and reproducible testing, which in turn requires actual reference materials. But none exist. All discussion about their behavior at the injection site, systemic distribution, shedding, or excretion is merely speculative narratives. From the perspective of actual science, they are fictitious.
Once true science is applied, there’s no need to debate mechanisms or effects. The absence of primary evidence is itself conclusive: these things simply do not exist.
As the article notes, Dr. Scoglio rightly states:
“99 percent of the scientists today talk bullshit essentially because they adopt a methodology that is bullshit — a methodology that has been there for a long time. Only nobody questions it.”
But the question is: who developed, approved, and implemented this methodology (testing)? Are they not medical experts and biologists — calling themselves “scientists”? These individuals have no education, training, or expertise in such matters. The subject falls squarely under the domain of actual science — chemistry — which clearly shows that these methodologies must be false or fraudulent due to the complete lack of reference standards (link). Yet true science has been systematically excluded from virology and medical practice. Therefore, the failure of methodology — and, by extension, the failure of virology and so-called medical science — lies entirely on their shoulders. They must acknowledge this tragic and false claim of being scientific disciplines.
In this context, “scientists” typically means biologists or medical experts — but these are not scientists in the truest sense. I’ve said it before: vaccines are complex mixtures of chemical junk — or more bluntly, gunk — nearly impossible to fully characterize. The list of 55 chemical components claimed to be in a given vaccine is little more than a guess. Whether those chemicals are present, absent, altered, or even formed during manufacturing is unknown and unknowable without full cooperation from the manufacturers — which we do not have.
I’ve described the likelihood of bacterial contamination during vaccine manufacturing (link). As this process was developed, approved, and implemented under the guidance of medical experts and biologists who lack proper training and expertise in product (chemical) development and manufacturing, problems in manufacturing (contamination and purification) have been overlooked. This, in itself, may be a significant contributor to the many adverse effects currently being observed.
As Dr. Scoglio puts it, these products are nothing short of toxic bombs. He states:
“These injections cannot even be called ‘vaccines.’ They’re just toxic bombs. Because if they’re not able to produce any viral antigen, that means they don’t perform as vaccines. So they’re not vaccines — they’re, again, just toxic bombs.”
Another powerful quote from the article states:
“The spike protein narrative represents perhaps the most elegant scientific deception ever conceived — a masterpiece of misdirection that would make any stage magician envious. While the world debates the toxicity of imaginary proteins, the actual crime proceeds unnoticed: the injection of 55 undeclared elements designed for purposes that have nothing to do with immunization.”
As Scoglio notes, spike proteins are never isolated from vaccinated individuals. “What they use are synthetic, lab-created substitutes.” However, that claim may itself be inaccurate. There are no lab-created substitutes that have been shown to exist in pure or isolated form, and no reliable tests or analytical methods have been established to monitor them. It is all an illusion, perpetuated by medical experts and biologists.
I’ve said it repeatedly: the spike protein — like the virus and mRNA itself — is a fictional construct. There is no scientific evidence — no isolation, no purification, no characterization — to support their existence. Nothing.
From the perspective of true science, there is no evidence that viruses, mRNA, or spike proteins exist. Therefore, the entire vaccine narrative — including all associated claims (efficacy) and consequences — is false and fraudulent. It must be categorically rejected and halted without delay.
Regarding the adverse effects of these so-called vaccines, there is clear evidence of harm. However, linking those effects to a specific vaccine component — or multiple components — is not scientifically possible at this stage. What we do know is this: when you inject chemical junk, which vaccines are, into the human body, consequences are inevitable — as I expected and described at the beginning of the so-called COVID-19 pandemic (the fraud). And that’s exactly what we’re witnessing, as stated here.
“On the other hand, it is impossible to develop a proper vaccine because, as noted, one cannot monitor the virus or disease and then how the vaccine’s effectiveness will be established. It cannot be! Therefore, a fake vaccine will most likely be developed to satisfy the regulatory wish and calm down the created public hysteria and fear. Unfortunately, such vaccines, if developed and administered, will undoubtedly create potentially dangerous side effects, without any presumed benefits, by interfering with the body’s immune system and other related physiological processes.” (link).
This is not just bad science.
It’s not science at all.