“A re-analysis of the Pfizer and Moderna trials, published in Vaccine by eminent, independent scientists—including BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi—revealed that from the very beginning, the rate of harm in these trials was alarming. According to their findings, you were two to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the COVID-19 vaccine.” Paraphrased from Dr. Malhotra’s recent presentation (link).
Impressive! After four years of vaccine rollout—and with significant harms now being reported—Dr. Aseem Malhotra, once a loud and loyal supporter of vaccines (including the COVID-19 vaccine), has suddenly reinvented himself as a leading activist against them. Remember, this is the same man who proudly proclaimed: “Some of the greatest achievements in medicine are traditional vaccines, no doubt.” (link)
In contrast, based on my education and expertise in science (Ph.D. in chemistry and 30 years as a scientist at Health Canada), I predicted the potential for serious harm from COVID-19 vaccines even before they were approved. On July 20, 2020, while Dr. Malhotra was still cheering vaccines, I wrote:
“It is impossible to develop a proper vaccine because one cannot monitor the virus or disease. How, then, can vaccine effectiveness ever be established? It cannot be! Therefore, a fake vaccine will most likely be developed to satisfy regulatory wishes and calm public hysteria. Such vaccines, if administered, will inevitably cause dangerous side effects without benefits, by interfering with the body’s immune system and other physiological processes.” (link)
This is a win for true science—and a devastating loss for so-called “medical science,” which is neither science nor medicine but fraud in disguise (link).
Why didn’t Dr. Malhotra see this earlier? Simple: he is a physician, trained in medical practice, not in science. Medicine masquerades as science under the misleading label “medical science.” It is a false and manufactured version of science, far removed from true science.
Now, like others, he has begun to link vaccine harms to “cancer.” But in my view, cancer itself may not even be a scientifically valid disease or diagnosis. Both cancer and viral infections are diagnosed largely on the basis of photographs. In virology, electron micrographs of cell cultures are decorated with dots and called “viruses.” In oncology, biopsy photographs are presented as “proof” of cancer. Neither constitutes real scientific evidence (link, link).
I have long argued that what is diagnosed as cancer could, in fact, be microbial infection—possibly originating from poor vaccine manufacturing and science practices, such as contamination and lack of purification. Supporting this, many patients have responded successfully to antimicrobial treatments, such as ivermectin (a recommended and FDA-approved antiparasitic drug).
Yet physicians, including Dr. Malhotra, refuse to consider this view. Why? Perhaps because their training allows them to follow only the narrow, accepted medical narrative—that cancer is an independent disease, and vaccines are sacrosanct—even though there is no solid scientific proof for either. To question this would not only collapse their high status in medicine but also expose their intellectual and scientific fragility (link).
In short, scientifically, vaccines are, for all practical purposes, junk and gunk (link), and their use must be stopped immediately. They can cause serious harm, which is now possibly being mislabeled as “cancer.” What we are likely seeing is a microbial infection, which should be recognized and treated accordingly with antimicrobial agents.