I was genuinely surprised to see a photo of Dr. Aseem Malhotra—a widely promoted UK cardiologist—posed in front of glass flasks and labware commonly used to symbolize a chemistry lab (link). It struck me as both ironic and misleading.
Physicians often distance themselves from chemistry, dismissing it as irrelevant to medical practice. Rarely do they study, engage with, or publish in actual scientific literature—particularly in fields like chemistry. So why pose with the trappings of a science they neither practice nor understand? It seems like a deliberate attempt to cloak medical opinion in the authority of science—especially when addressing issues like vaccine safety and toxicity.
Let’s not forget: the entire virus and vaccine crisis has been driven by false claims and misguided practices from individuals who are not scientists. They have not conducted proper scientific research, yet they dominate the narrative.
Dr. Malhotra stated that “Trust in doctors is at an all-time low.“ Perhaps that’s why we now see a push to rebrand physicians as scientific experts—to restore credibility through imagery and language, not substance.
In February 2021, he appeared on Good Morning Britain advocating Covid-19 vaccination for the elderly, saying:
“We need to understand where this vaccine hesitancy is coming from… trust needs to be restored… vaccines by far are the safest.”
Yet just months later, following his father’s sudden death shortly after receiving the vaccine, his views shifted dramatically.
Although he admits there was “no concrete evidence“ linking the vaccine to his father’s death, he now believes it‘s the only explanation.
So what changed? His training, credentials, and understanding of science remained the same. His new position, like the old one, is built on narrative, not scientific inquiry. This is precisely the problem: physicians crafting stories and presenting them as science. They are not trained scientists, and they do not follow scientific principles or procedures. They simply repackage their opinions—once in favor, now against—and brand both as “evidence-based.”
But the hard truth remains:
- These individuals are not science experts.
- They have no authority to speak on matters of chemistry, virology, toxicology, or immunology in scientific terms.
- There is no valid evidence of a virus, reliable testing, or a scientific rationale for vaccination.
Yet they continue to promote—and now to criticize—false science using the same faulty tools. It’s still the marketing of medicine under a false label of science.
The only way out of this mess is to bring real science—chemistry—and actual scientists into the conversation. Only then can we expose the fraud, clarify the absence of evidence for viral illness, and end the dangerous, baseless practice of mass vaccination.
Absence of Science in Healthcare (link)
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)