My comment on the article ((link)
As I wrote in one of my recent blog posts (link), worldwide authorities, including the FDA, CDC, USP, etc., drug approvals are not based on scientific investigations or logical considerations but on compliance with their arbitrary requirements and standards.
There is a gross misunderstanding among the public, including medical experts, that the approved products are based on science (advanced or sophisticated). Not at all. They set up some arbitrary standards and then showed some laboratory work, pictures, and numbers (mostly unrelated) to make their claims “sellable.”
A recent example is the COVID-19 virus. Authorities first assume (when there is nothing) that there is a virus and then develop some experiments, like culturing, “sequencing,” PCR, pictures, etc., to say there is proof for the virus.
No toxicity/pathogenicity of the virus has ever been established because no virus sample is available (link). Similarly, vaccine safety and efficacy cannot be established as no pure and isolated vaccine (mRNA) sample is available. Safety and efficacy are assumed/imagined (link).
It’s all fake and false (medical/pharmaceutical science). Use caution when listening to medical/pharmaceutical (doctor’s science) experts.