A couple of my followers on social media brought, to my attention, a recent publication published under a variety of headings, including news media, seeking opinion concerning the validity of claims made [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].
In short, the study describes observations after inoculating the claimed SARS-COV-2 virus to healthy human volunteers to produce the virus effects.
The study claims that volunteers were “inoculated with 10 TCID50 of a wild-type virus (SARS-CoV-2/human/GBR/484861/2020) intranasally in an open-label, non-randomized study …” [2]
This statement is incorrect and deceitful.
The study did not use the virus but an “isolate.” An isolate means part/portion of the growth culture (gunk) from a swab sample, with multiple ingredients added, including cells or debris, such as Africam green monkey kidney cells (or Vero cells).
Please, follow the (link) to see the description of the “virus.” It uses the word isolate in the title, not the virus, as presumed by the study’s authors.
I previously described the differences between a virus and the “isolate” on my blog. Please see here; (1, 2).
It further confirms that there has never been a virus (SARS-COV-2) isolated, and no virus sample is available anywhere. Therefore, scientifically speaking, the virus (SARS-COV-2) and its illness (COVID-19 ) and its pandemic have been a hoax, as previously described (1,2, 3). The reported study provides further support for such an understanding.
The publication will undoubtedly cause serious damage to the scientific credibility of the journal and study authors. In addition, it will further expose the fictitiousness or fraudulent science aspect of virology.