Question Asked:
Are particles like urea in urine, sugar in blood, and bacteria in blood different from what we call “viruses”?
Response:
Urea, sugar, bacteria, and enzymes can all be detected, identified, and even purified with relative ease. These are real, demonstrable substances. I avoid using the term particles here because “particle” refers to a physical state that may or may not be observable under all conditions. For example, table salt exists as particles in solid form, but when dissolved in water, its particulate state disappears, forming ions—yet it is still considered salt. However, sand exists as particles almost all the time, even when mixed with water. The important point is that these substances are tangible, measurable, and their testing is valid.
Viruses, however, are another matter. The question is often raised: are they so much smaller than the above substances that they require a special kind of “medical science” to see or understand?
The truth is simpler: when anyone uses the word virus, they should know that no such entity has ever been demonstrated to exist. Therefore, it is impossible to know anything about them or compare them with real, measurable substances. A “virus” is a fictional construct, at least scientifically—like the frightening creatures adults invent to scare children into obedience.
Medical experts (physicians) have adopted the “virus” as their own frightening object. They use it to convince people that they are sick or at risk of becoming ill. But unlike a bedtime story, this fiction serves a business model. It sells medical services and treatments for enormous profit.
The legitimacy of this business model rests on what is called medical science. Unfortunately, what is presented as medical science is not science at all. It is a narration, cloaked in complex terminology borrowed from real science—especially chemistry. Doctors are not trained in science, nor do they truly understand it. They accept and repeat stories in the same way a layperson might. Yet, because of their social position, they are well paid, granted authority, and given respect. Their unscientific claims become “authentic,” and the public becomes trapped in a cycle of belief and fraud.
Even more troubling is the practice of administering drugs, especially vaccines. Few realize that vaccines have never been tested against actual viruses—because no such viruses exist to test against. What is injected are foreign substances (scientifically or chemically junk or filth, practically unmeasurable). The body recognizes them as foreign and reacts, often causing harm, which is later dismissed as “unavoidable side effects” or the cost of developing beneficial and effective treatments. Many of these harms are reclassified into exotic illnesses such as “cancer,” another terrifying concept (object) used again to sell even more costly treatments. And so the business model continues.
What follows is enormous testing, enormous medication, and enormous surgeries—all directed at imaginary, non-existent “scary objects.” All in the name of so-called “science.” But in reality, this is fake science, because doctors are not trained in science at any real level. Propaganda and marketing have convinced doctors, authorities, and the public that this is advanced scientific research, accessible only to doctors. Ordinary people are told they cannot understand it—let alone question it. Anyone who dares to question is ridiculed, silenced, or excluded from the category of normal or intelligent people.
My views are not based on emotion, but on education and practice in actual science. I hold a Ph.D. in analytical chemistry (actual science) —the science of testing, identifying, and validating real substances. I spent thirty years at Health Canada as a research scientist, interacting directly with medical experts to develop pharmaceutical testing in laboratories, including counterparts at the US FDA. This involved working with both human subjects and animals, a task most medical experts have never undertaken or fully understood. This foundation in real science—not belief—enables me to see the fundamental fraud behind the “virus” and the vast medical education built upon it.
I leave this with you to reflect upon—and to act accordingly.