I listened to Dr. Bret Weinstein’s response to Piers Morgan’s question in this 1:34-minute video clip and noted several errors or unsupported claims (link). For example:
He stated: “… in an effort to provide immunity against COVID-19 …”
There is no scientifically valid evidence that COVID-19 exists. It is a belief that COVID-19 is caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2. However, there is no evidence that this virus has ever been shown to exist. Therefore, a disease attributed to this virus cannot exist.
Dr. Weinstein is an evolutionary biologist or biology expert, not in the true sense of the word a scientist—particularly in the field of substance isolation and characterization, like viruses. That domain belongs to science proper, specifically chemistry, not biology. Hence, not only is he making a false statement, but he may not even realize it. He should reconsider his position on this topic.
In mainstream virology, the existence of a virus is generally claimed through indirect evidence rather than physical isolation. This is based on three main elements: the appearance of characteristic changes in cultured cells (cytopathic effects) after exposure to patient material, the identification of genetic sequences within those samples, which are then assembled into a presumed viral genome, and the epidemiological correlation of those genetic findings with patterns of illness. Taken together, these are considered sufficient to establish the presence and existence of a virus, even though no direct purification or chemical characterization is done.
From a biological perspective, the existence of viruses is assumed rather than demonstrated as an actual physical presence. This is where biology—and by extension, so-called medical science—fails as a true science, since genuine sciences such as physics and chemistry deal only with physically existing entities (link). Because a virus is not a physical thing, it cannot be studied scientifically. Therefore, claims about viruses remain non-scientific, fictional, or purely imaginative.
Biologists often describe the mRNA vaccine concepts as follows:
“… the design of this platform is to induce your own cells to make a foreign protein which gets displayed on the surface of those cells—that’s as intended.”
But scientifically, there is no evidence that the protein (chemical) is made inside cells—even the presence of the mRNA (chemical), which is presumed to facilitate protein production, has not been confirmed. To monitor the presence of a protein or mRNA, one would need scientifically valid tests. Again, this falls under the scientific field of chemistry, not biology. A test method cannot be developed without reference standards, which require isolated and fully characterized physical samples of mRNA and protein. Since such samples are not available, no valid test can be developed, meaning these components cannot be detected or monitored. Hence, the concept of mRNA and protein, concerning vaccines, remains imaginary, fictional, and non-scientific. This is not a matter of opinion but a scientific fact.
Another of Dr. Weinstein’s claims is:
“… to see those foreign proteins and conclude the only thing they can, which is that those cells have been virally infected. And the right response—the natural response—of the body is to take virally infected cells and destroy them.”
This conclusion is also flawed. There is no scientific method available to demonstrate that proteins are present on the surface of cells, or elsewhere, in a way that validates such a claim. Therefore, the statement that cells are “virally infected” is an assumption without valid scientific evidence.
Such views and statements should be reconsidered and withdrawn to avoid causing further harm based on a poor—or missing—understanding of actual science, which in this case is chemistry.
I hope my observations will be given serious consideration.