A Chemist’s Perspective on What That Really Means
Recently, Dr. Malone commented: “President Trump wants to know whether or not there’s actual science behind the entire [children’s vaccination] schedule.”
This is indeed an interesting statement. If the President of the United States is questioning whether there is actual science behind vaccination, then it deserves serious attention.
Dr. Robert Malone, often credited with pioneering mRNA technology, has participated in discussions with public health officials and working group leaders, including those affiliated with the ACIP and HHS.
Dr. Malone, often regarded as one of the key figures behind mRNA vaccine development, should have been the first to respond with confidence and evidence. As someone long associated with “science,” he should have assured the President that the science is sound, settled, and proven.
But instead, he appeared to agree — implying that perhaps something is wrong with the science itself and that it needs to be “fixed.”
Actual Science Does Not Change or Require Fixing on Demand
Here lies the core of the problem. If the science applied is valid, it does not require change. The fundamental principles of real science — chemistry, physics, and mathematics — remain constant.
If something must be “changed” on demand, then it was never science to begin with.
And that is precisely the case with so-called medical science.
Medical science has not been built on genuine experimentation with real substances, but rather on assumptions, interpretations, and narratives — created largely by those without true scientific credentials, primarily physicians. The entire field of virology and vaccine research rests on claims rather than on evidence.
The Virus That Never Was
From a true scientific standpoint — that is, from the perspective of chemistry — there is no evidence that any virus has ever been physically isolated, purified, and characterized.
After more than half a century of well-funded research, one would expect at least a single vial or test tube containing an actual sample of a coronavirus — something measurable, identifiable, and verifiable by independent chemists. Yet none exists.
So, the question arises: What have these researchers actually been studying?
What samples, exactly, have they been working on?
In reality, they have been working on nothing.
The truth, though uncomfortable, is clear: there are no viruses, and therefore, there are no viral diseases and no scientifically valid vaccines.
The Real Scientific Problem
In truth, there is no scientific project to approve or conduct under what is called “medical research.” When the very subject — the virus — does not exist, everything built upon it collapses.
This is not a matter of opinion. It is a matter of scientific fact — verifiable through chemistry.
If true science had been applied, the outcome would have been obvious, and the fraud would have been exposed long ago. Instead, the illusion has been sustained through institutional inertia, political pressure, and financial interest.
A Message to the President
So, to answer the President’s question:
No — there is no actual science behind the vaccination schedule, nor behind the broader structure of modern medical science.
That conclusion does not come from speculation but from a lifetime devoted to real science — chemistry — supported by decades of laboratory experience, regulatory work, and analytical verification.
As a scientist trained to the Ph.D. level, with more than 50 years of experience in the field, I can state this with full confidence: There is no virus, no valid viral test, and no vaccine that meets the definition of true science.
If anyone disagrees, the challenge is simple:
Provide real evidence — physical, chemical, and verifiable — and prove me wrong.