I would like to add some comments on the narrative (link). For convenience, the narrative is attached below.
Regarding the statement: “Immunization Practices (ACIP) has formed a new work group to review COVID-19 vaccines, focusing on safety, effectiveness, immunogenicity, and persistence of vaccine components such as mRNA, spike protein, and lipid nanoparticles.”
It must be stated plainly: the so-called components—mRNA, spike protein, lipid-related nanoparticles—are imaginary constructs manufactured by what passes as “medical science.” This is not legitimate science, but rather a pseudo-scientific framework built on assumptions rather than evidence. The entire narrative is tied to the concept of “viruses.” Yet, no virus has ever been scientifically demonstrated to exist as an actual, isolated, and purified entity in humans or animals. Without that proof, the rest collapses.
Concerning: “Retsef Levi, an MIT professor who has previously raised concerns about COVID-19 vaccine safety, was appointed chair of the work group.”
It is worth underscoring that Prof. Levi, though a professor, is not a physician or a scientist in the relevant sense. His background is in mathematics and operations management (link)—not chemistry or physics, the true science subjects. His expertise lies in modeling and predicting trends, and while such skills may be valuable, they are only as good as the data being modeled. In this case, the data he must rely on comes from the CDC and FDA, both of which have a track record of promoting fraudulent, scientifically invalid claims. Their “evidence” is built on the unproven notion that viruses exist, and that illnesses are linked to them. Consequently, any investigation under Prof. Levi is compromised before it begins: a model based on false data will only yield false conclusions.
The narrative further notes: “This review marks a significant shift in U.S. public health policy under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Earlier this year, the CDC—under his direction—stopped recommending COVID-19 vaccination for healthy children and pregnant women, reversing long-standing guidance that urged nearly universal vaccination for people six months and older.”
This reversal may appear bold, but it must not be confused with genuine scientific progress. It is a political and public-pressure maneuver, not a triumph of science. RFK Jr.’s leadership (with his own investigations) has forced the issue into the open, but the promoted shift remains rooted in the same flawed framework of medical pseudoscience.
The public must treat this reorganization with great caution. What is truly needed is a committee composed of experts from the real sciences—chemistry, analytical sciences, and related fields—who can evaluate claims with rigorous, verifiable methods. Such a committee would quickly conclude that the central pillars of today’s “medical science”—viruses, mRNA, spike proteins, and so-called vaccines—have no solid foundation and must be discarded. Only then can the public be freed from fraudulent science, manufactured illness, and the endless cycle of irrelevant treatments sustained by a corrupt system.
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)
Chemistry, Not Medicine, Defines Science (link)
An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
______________________________________________________________
The narrative (link)
The CDC’s Advisory Committee onImmunization Practices (ACIP) has formed a new work group to review COVID-19 vaccines, focusing on safety, effectiveness, immunogenicity, and persistence of vaccine components such as mRNA, spike protein, and lipid nanoparticles.The group will also examine concerns over DNA contamination, effects of repeated booster doses, vaccine-related serious adverse events, and overall impacts on hospitalization and mortality rates. Retsef Levi, an MIT professor who has previously raised concerns about COVID-19 vaccine safety, was appointed chair of the work group; members will consult with CDC, FDA, and outside experts before issuing new recommendations. Under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the CDC has already shifted its stance, halting recommendations for vaccinating healthy children and pregnant women, replacing the previous advisory panel, and preparing for new ACIP meetings scheduled later this year. Policy Shifts and Broader Context
This review marks a significant shift in U.S. public health policy under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Earlier this year, the CDC-under his direction-stopped recommending COVID-19 vaccination for healthy children and pregnant women, reversing long-standing guidance that urged nearly universal vaccination for people six months and older. Kennedy also removed all former ACIP members, appointing new figures such as Levi and Malone to reshape the committee.
The new work group’s mandate suggests an openness to re-examining fundamental assumptions about COVID-19 vaccines. While the CDC continues to affirm that vaccination protects against severe illness, hospitalization, and death, it now acknowledges the need for deeper study of safety, booster impacts, and potential long-term biological effects.
Next Steps
The ACIP general meeting is expected in late August or September, with another scheduled for October 22-23. Committee members and observers suggest the timeline may be slow, but they stress that the review represents meaningful progress toward addressing unresolved questions about COVID-19 vaccination policy.