Author: Dr. Saeed Qureshi, Ph.D.

I came across this article “Genetic tracing of market wildlife and viruses at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.” (link)

There are three at least issues with claims made:

  • Genetic virus tracing cannot be done because a virus has not been isolated and characterized. Therefore, the gene cannot be established or traced. The publication makes a false claim about the virus.
  • The virus cartoon in the abstract’s top left corner cannot be true because no sample of the isolated virus is currently available.

    As per the publication, “This study did not generate new unique reagents, but processed data generated for this study can be found in the supplementary files, and reconstructed genomes and phylogenies can be found at the data and code repository associated with this work.” No experimental work was done. But, computer-generated codes/” sequences” were used. Therefore, work was not done with the virus but with computing. (False claim about working with the virus)
  • The publication authors and institutions are related to medical and biological areas/subjects, not science, as commonly understood or implied. The publication may be understood as a science publication, which is incorrect. (link)

Therefore, I stamped it as certified BS’ (link)

medicine, healthcare and pharmacy concept – different pills and capsules of drugs

A drug dissolution test is a test used to establish the quality of a pharmaceutical product, such as a tablet or capsule. This test is conducted because the drug (often called active ingredient) needs to be released from the product for its absorption into the blood to elicit its therapeutic effect.

The test is conducted in place of a clinical test/study called bioavailability or bioequivalence, a pharmacology/pharmacokinetic study type. The test is the backbone of quality assessment of all tablet and capsule products. It is a requirement of worldwide authorities, including the FDA, Health Canada, etc., and pharmacopeias such as USP, BP, EP, etc.

(more…)

While surfing the internet, I came across this subheading, “Romans Believed In Witchcraft.” Reading the short paragraph paused me thinking about the current science practices of physicians.

For a long time, especially for the past four years of COVID-19 and its vaccine claims and activities, I have been convinced that the practices of physicians are simply modern-day versions of Romans’ witchcraft by replacing the word “witchcraft” with “Medical Science.”

As a science learner for practically all my adult life (50+ years) and a practicing scientist for 35+ years, I can clearly see that modern-day physicians do not study, learn, or practice science. Their claims about science are false and fraudulent.

Their education is based on a typical non-science undergraduate degree (M.D. or equivalent). Their education and training do not teach them science, but to memorize terminologies from actual science/chemistry books to use them ritualistically, making up their “modern science” (witchcraft).

They are dressed in modern versions of ritualistic costumes, in white or blue, with airtight outfits containing masks, filters, and oxygen cylinders. They stand by some fancy instruments. I know from experience that they do not know what these instruments are supposed to do or how to work with them properly.

With this dressing up, they try to show they protect themselves and the public from invisible particles/viruses (the modern name for witches), represented by culturing and CPE (cytopathic effects), isolation, sequencing, clinical trials, etc. (magical texts), balls with spikes, some gibberish drawings, chemical structures and reactions, photographs of cultures/filth (ritual figurines)), and expert opinions; like peer-reviewed studies, spike-proteins, etc.(spells). And on top of all this, using “medicines” like vaccines, chemotherapy, etc. (poisons or magical potions)

In short, keep the above thoughts in mind when reading and listening to modern-day medical science/scientists – they truly are witch doctors. May Almighty save us all from their science practices. Ameen!

From internet:

Romans Believed In Witchcraft:

In ancient Rome, witchcraft and magic were deeply ingrained in society—both respected and feared. Despite attempts to regulate magic through the law, it was widespread, and many Romans sought out practitioners like witches or sorcerers to help them.

Common practices included the use of magical texts, binding curses, ritual figurines, and spells. In the Republic and Imperial periods, people even used poisons that were considered to be like magical potions to achieve specific goals like keeping people quiet or providing protection. (link )

Pharmaceuticals/drugs/medicines are often pure (potent) chemicals that are nonphysiological and can be detrimental to normal body processes (reflected as adverse effects/reactions), as can natural products and ingredients, especially if taken in large amounts and for extended periods.

In general, allopathic drugs are developed and should be prescribed for their acute effect to minimize or avoid their serious effects. Further scientific research is needed to understand the mechanism of drug actions or interactions (good or bad) to address the harmful effects of drugs and, by extension, develop safe and efficacious medicines.

(more…)

If medicine is declared safe and effective by medical experts (aka physicians) or regulatory authorities (another title for medical experts/physicians), then such products should be placed in stores along with other safe and effective products (like meat, vegetables, dairy products, processed items, ketchup, candies and cookies, salad dressings, harsh chemicals like sink cleaners, detergent, paints, etc.) for anyone to buy as needed.

Why does a customer have to pay someone to hand over the (safe and effective) medicines from the shelf to them? Why can medicines not be delivered directly from the manufacturers to the consumer, just like so many other safe and effective products such as food (pizza, drinks, etc.)? Like any other safe and effective product, they are all chemical-based products produced by processing industries.

Furthermore, if medicines do not work as claimed or expected, then there should be an option for their return, like other safe and effective products. Why do these products come with a non-return policy and protection (immunity) for suppliers/manufacturers/physicians for the harm they may cause?

Think about it!

The reason is that these products are developed, assessed, and manufactured by medical “science” experts, “scientists,” or under their guidance. However, they do not have the scientific knowledge, training, and experience to develop, assess, and manufacture these products. If you disagree, then prove me wrong. In short, they are handled by those unqualified for the job, requiring protection from expected mishaps (lacking efficacy and safety).

Logically, as medicines are chemicals or chemical-based, they should be developed, evaluated, and manufactured by experts in science/chemistry. They will happily do the job and deliver their products directly to the users/patients with relevant guarantees—a much better option than the current system, which causes massive health and financial issues worldwide.

A revolutionary idea for drug delivery efficiency and an economical alternative!