Author: Dr. Saeed Qureshi, Ph.D.

Post Views: 12

In general, people follow the views of doctors about the “cause” (diagnosis) of an illness, assuming that they have studied such a subject (science) in detail and depth. Unfortunately, doctors do not study this or any other science. Their education is based on an undergraduate non-science degree (M.D.). Therefore, their views/guesses (for germs or viruses) are as good or bad about recognizing illness and matching for its treatment as anyone else. Hence, the debate continues.

They often describe their “science,” using primarily chemical formulas, structures, and reactions/processes, i.e., the science of chemicals or chemistry. However, from the science/chemistry perspective, these representations are primarily false and fraudulent, effectively causing misdiagnosis (fake illnesses) and fake and faulty, in fact, dangerous and toxic,  treatments.

These irrelevant and dangerous practices by doctors need to stop, particularly all claims of  “scientific research” in various medical institutions.

link, link

Post Views: 31

I came across this article “Genetic tracing of market wildlife and viruses at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.” (link)

There are three at least issues with claims made:

  • Genetic virus tracing cannot be done because a virus has not been isolated and characterized. Therefore, the gene cannot be established or traced. The publication makes a false claim about the virus.
  • The virus cartoon in the abstract’s top left corner cannot be true because no sample of the isolated virus is currently available.

    As per the publication, “This study did not generate new unique reagents, but processed data generated for this study can be found in the supplementary files, and reconstructed genomes and phylogenies can be found at the data and code repository associated with this work.” No experimental work was done. But, computer-generated codes/” sequences” were used. Therefore, work was not done with the virus but with computing. (False claim about working with the virus)
  • The publication authors and institutions are related to medical and biological areas/subjects, not science, as commonly understood or implied. The publication may be understood as a science publication, which is incorrect. (link)

Therefore, I stamped it as certified BS’ (link)

Post Views: 22
medicine, healthcare and pharmacy concept – different pills and capsules of drugs

A drug dissolution test is a test used to establish the quality of a pharmaceutical product, such as a tablet or capsule. This test is conducted because the drug (often called active ingredient) needs to be released from the product for its absorption into the blood to elicit its therapeutic effect.

The test is conducted in place of a clinical test/study called bioavailability or bioequivalence, a pharmacology/pharmacokinetic study type. The test is the backbone of quality assessment of all tablet and capsule products. It is a requirement of worldwide authorities, including the FDA, Health Canada, etc., and pharmacopeias such as USP, BP, EP, etc.

(more…)
Post Views: 16

While surfing the internet, I came across this subheading, “Romans Believed In Witchcraft.” Reading the short paragraph paused me thinking about the current science practices of physicians.

For a long time, especially for the past four years of COVID-19 and its vaccine claims and activities, I have been convinced that the practices of physicians are simply modern-day versions of Romans’ witchcraft by replacing the word “witchcraft” with “Medical Science.”

As a science learner for practically all my adult life (50+ years) and a practicing scientist for 35+ years, I can clearly see that modern-day physicians do not study, learn, or practice science. Their claims about science are false and fraudulent.

Their education is based on a typical non-science undergraduate degree (M.D. or equivalent). Their education and training do not teach them science, but to memorize terminologies from actual science/chemistry books to use them ritualistically, making up their “modern science” (witchcraft).

They are dressed in modern versions of ritualistic costumes, in white or blue, with airtight outfits containing masks, filters, and oxygen cylinders. They stand by some fancy instruments. I know from experience that they do not know what these instruments are supposed to do or how to work with them properly.

With this dressing up, they try to show they protect themselves and the public from invisible particles/viruses (the modern name for witches), represented by culturing and CPE (cytopathic effects), isolation, sequencing, clinical trials, etc. (magical texts), balls with spikes, some gibberish drawings, chemical structures and reactions, photographs of cultures/filth (ritual figurines)), and expert opinions; like peer-reviewed studies, spike-proteins, etc.(spells). And on top of all this, using “medicines” like vaccines, chemotherapy, etc. (poisons or magical potions)

In short, keep the above thoughts in mind when reading and listening to modern-day medical science/scientists – they truly are witch doctors. May Almighty save us all from their science practices. Ameen!

From internet:

Romans Believed In Witchcraft:

In ancient Rome, witchcraft and magic were deeply ingrained in society—both respected and feared. Despite attempts to regulate magic through the law, it was widespread, and many Romans sought out practitioners like witches or sorcerers to help them.

Common practices included the use of magical texts, binding curses, ritual figurines, and spells. In the Republic and Imperial periods, people even used poisons that were considered to be like magical potions to achieve specific goals like keeping people quiet or providing protection. (link )

Post Views: 20

Pharmaceuticals/drugs/medicines are often pure (potent) chemicals that are nonphysiological and can be detrimental to normal body processes (reflected as adverse effects/reactions), as can natural products and ingredients, especially if taken in large amounts and for extended periods.

In general, allopathic drugs are developed and should be prescribed for their acute effect to minimize or avoid their serious effects. Further scientific research is needed to understand the mechanism of drug actions or interactions (good or bad) to address the harmful effects of drugs and, by extension, develop safe and efficacious medicines.

(more…)