Author: Dr. Saeed Qureshi, Ph.D.

People often object to my views/articles, stating that I only reference my blog articles (i.e., self-referencing) and do not cite articles from peer-reviewed journals concerning the existence of the virus and its related topics. The lack of articles on the subject in peer-reviewed journals is of concern about the credibility and authenticity of my work. 

On the other hand, they argue that numerous scientific articles from various sources are available and published in peer-reviewed journals showing, that the virus exists and has been isolated. Hence, their claims for the virus’s existence are credible.

People here are confusing consensus with the true physical (experimental) science. The view is that many studies about the virus have been published in the literature, so the virus must be there and isolated. That is consensus. However, I practice and describe experimental physical science (actual science – chemistry), which requires an actual sample of a substance to work with, in this case, the virus. As no actual virus sample is available, I cannot do scientific studies, publish, or write like others, i.e., publish fake science studies (for example, see here).

This practice of fake science in the medical/virology areas is common and alarming. It cannot be addressed internally as they all believe fake science is real/actual science, causing huge damage to science and the public.

An external audit can only address the issue, which will quickly show that medical experts have been working with fake science and have never been with actual science. If not all, most of the publications will have to be withdrawn as having no merit or value. Most people who are not knowledgeable in science do not realize the disastrous fakeness of science in the medical and pharmaceutical areas.

I hope this helps clear up the concern.

Some say science is what follows or adheres to the Scientific Method; otherwise, it is pseudoscience. It is like saying cooking is what follows the cooking method. Is it not a circular definition or argument?

In reality, science comes first. The “Scientific Method” comes after; it is a derivative of or dependent on science.

(Actual) science means studying chemistry, physics, and mathematics in significant detail. One studies science and then develops its methods (for understanding and extending scientific concepts) using scientific principles, which become true scientific methods. Therefore, one must first study science (chemistry, physics, and mathematics) to develop and deal with scientific methods.

On the other hand, people who do not study science but like to promote themselves as scientists/researchers promote a made-up definition of science based on the so-called “Scientific Method,” bypassing the requirements or needs of science or its study – clever! In this case, there is no need to know or understand science but to keep lecturing others about science. It’s a typical scam/con trick to consider oneself a scientist/researcher (i.e., without studying science). This is how many non-science experts became scientists/researchers. The issue is more visible in medicine and biology (such as virology, immunology, microbiology, etc).

Be vigilant about this con artistry or fake science promotion. If you like to know about actual science, look for people who studied and specialized in science subjects – chemistry, physics, and mathematics. More here.

It is a lie that medical and pharmaceutical experts follow science. They do not study, get training, or practice science. The actual science is chemistry, as most medicines are chemicals and behave in the body following the principles of chemistry (the science), which these professionals hardly study or apply. There is no such thing as medical or pharmaceutical science. These are false and fraudulent versions of chemistry.

The assertions of the virus’ (SARS-COV-2) existence, its illness (COVID-19), and the development of vaccines (mRNA) have been false and fraudulent and can easily be shown so by applying basic scientific (chemical) principles.

In the future, avoid anyone who promotes (chemical) based medicines without having extensive knowledge and training in chemistry/science, such as isolation, testing, and test validation. Their claims almost certainly will be baseless and false.

For further details, see here, here, here, and more.

I studied science/chemistry from grade 9th to Ph.D. level, specializing in analytical-organic chemistry, which makes learning time almost 12 years. Then, I worked for 35 years in the field.

I worked for five years in the industry (food/agriculture), where I supported (analytical) testing and helped isolate a toxin (vomitoxin, a fungal plant pathogen) using industrial-scale culturing. Following that, I spent thirty years with Health Canada as a research scientist (analytical, organic chemistry), working with testing for pharmaceuticals, both in vitro and in vivo, including clinical trials. Details of expertise and work experience may be found here, here.

The short bio above shows that I have not studied or trained as a medical practitioner (physician) or biological subject expert in virology, immunology, microbiology, etc. However, I interacted extensively with biological and medical experts, where people of my expertise and experience are considered “outsiders,” which is unfortunate and has resulted in medical issues, like the most recent one, COVID-19.

Continue here

A recent article published in Epoch Times, titled “Growing Number Of GOP Candidates Pledge To Disavow COVID-19 Vaccine And Big Pharma” reported here (link), makes suggestions for stopping poorly developed vaccine injections, stating.

“It is pretty clear that the numbers and the data behind the vaccine were not accurate and as a result we are looking at what is probably one of the greatest blunders in modern medical history,” said Mr. Lowe.

“We started enforcing injections on people without having accurate information and it ended up costing lives.”

“This whole episode has been a dark blotch on our country and there needs to be change and that starts with our elected representatives,” added Mr. Lowe.

John Perez, who is running in the GOP primary for the House District 133 seat in Texas, cited the outsized influence pharmaceutical companies have had on the political system.

“I pledge right here and right now that I have not and will not accept donations or in-kind contributions from Big Pharma PACs or Big Pharma companies,” Mr. Perez wrote in a Dec 17 post on X, …”

It may be more appropriate, beneficial, and expeditious if the issue is addressed differently.

It is true that the (pharmaceutical) industry manufactured the vaccines and benefitted immensely. However, the COVID-19 disaster is not their making, in my view. People and political leadership seem to be missing this critical point.

The medical profession, in particular, physicians, consider themselves scientists – falsely and fraudulently, directly or through Government agencies, caused this disaster. They are still promoting false viruses, variant narratives, and fictional illnesses. They conduct false and fraudulent laboratory “research” because they are not trained to be scientists or to do such research. It is all fake science (they conduct and promote).

Therefore, as a first step to addressing the virus/vaccine issue, they should be disqualified from their claim as scientists and laboratory researchers. Their so-called laboratory activity/research must be stopped immediately. The industry will be unable to produce or have the incentive to make fake science-based medicines. Society will benefit healthwise and save resources by avoiding spending on fake and unnecessary medications and treatments.

Further information may be found here (link, link, link, link)

Disaster If WHO Gets Total Medical Control – Dr. Meryl Nass (link).

So, what is the request/suggestion here?

To keep “control” with physicians and their national institutions, like the CDC, FDA, National Medical Associations, etc. Is it not this control by the physicians and their organizations that caused the fake pandemic, as well as the development of fraudulent medications, including vaccines?

I believe the public and experts are missing the point. It is not a ” control ” issue but considering and promoting physicians as “scientists.” This is the problem that caused the fake pandemic.

Physicians do not learn or are trained to be scientists. They are not taught to identify new illnesses, their causes, and their treatment. However, this is what they did and are doing that caused the harm – the pandemic and associated public policy disasters.

In the interview, Dr. Nass acknowledges the COVID-19 illness, which, in reality, does not exist scientifically. There is no illness of this name/nature because it is assumed to be caused by a virus called SARS-COV-2, which is now generally recognized not to exist. It is an illusion from an actual scientific perspective.

Therefore, to avoid potential future (fake) pandemics, physicians’ role must be limited to only what they study and are trained for, i.e., to prescribe medications for recognized illnesses with recommended treatments. Their classification as “scientists” needs to be reconsidered or discontinued (link).

This article is a response to an intense discussion on FB (Link, link, link, link). Considering its length, which may not be suitable for FB, I am posting it as a blog article. My blog visitors, who may not follow FB, would also benefit from the post here.

Wow! Very interesting comments here on this thread and others.

To me, the most interesting ones are the comments concerning my (unacceptable) behavior and (poor) writing and communication skills. It is laughable; many clearly understand what I write about the science and the virus/virology. So, what is the issue? Do you expect that I should have writing skills like competing against a Harry Potter Novel writer or some linguistic expert? Sorry, I write simply using direct words, often science and scientific demands, not in sweet or double-meaning wordings or narratives. Continue here

Two days ago, I posted a link to a Substack article on FB (link), which missed or ignored an important contribution (mine). I do not understand why people felt hurt or angry with the post and comments. See for yourself. Mike Stone (ViroLIEgy fame) even started a separate Thread citing some comments (link).

I wondered what happened and what might have caused such trashy behavior and outbursts by some in the “group.”

It appears that it could be the outcome of a post by Linda (on TG), a simple and short comment supporting my views, which the group could not handle, even though she emphasizes that my views do not contradict those mentioned by non-virus camp.

So, why is so much anger against me and my views? It’s hard to know, except they are sensitive to their false claim, narrative, or science. Is it?

You be the judge. I would appreciate your thoughts on it, if possible, as to why so much anger and bad-mouthing against me.

Thanks to Linda and so many others who read my articles and provided appreciation and support. Thanks again from the bottom of my heart. God bless you all!