Category: Analaytical Testing

Below is my response to Malcolm Glass’s comment on Facebook (link). His comment is provided at the end of my response.

Thank you very much for taking the time to evaluate my view critically and for explaining your understanding of the subject.

In short, your narrative does not accurately describe my position. Your description is similar to those who consider there is no or limited need to know or understand science to resolve the virus or virology issue. A straightforward discussion (based on so-called logic) could easily and effectively resolve the issue. No true! If that had been the case, the problem would have been resolved a long time ago.

Unfortunately, both groups (virus and non-virus) have been arguing about science (without understanding it) and have failed to resolve the issue. My view is that if one wants to discuss science, then say so. Do not hide it under the rug of logic or high school stuff.

(more…)

Learning and managing science or scientific research by doctors (medical science experts) is like learning from a pitstop tech about the oil industry (exploration, extraction, processing, etc.) who claims to have seen it all in the world of oils and lube in the shop (“clinics”).

Interestingly, the pitstop tech may be better qualified as they can show samples of lube and oils, not the medical experts who cannot show what they have been working with.

I am serious!

Medical experts (physicians) are educated and trained to write prescriptions using some technical vocabulary (most from science/chemistry). They have no education or understanding of the actual science or scientific (lab) research.

The public and their leadership must consider this fact, particularly at CDC/FDA/HHS. Years of work (“research”) with billions of dollars of funding for virus works, but no samples of viruses to show. What do these “scientists/researchers” work with or on?  



mRNA Vaccine Is Not mRNA But Gunk – A Forensic Analysis (link)
Cancer and Ivermectin (link)
COVID-19: The virus does not exist – it is confirmed! (link)
Who Is Corrupt: Doctors Or Pharma? Check It Yourself (link)
Vaccines: Useless But Dangerous Soup/Gunk That Must Be Purged (link)
Vaccine Science: Nonsense And BS! (link)
An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
What is science, and who are scientists? link
My training and expertise – people ask! link

As noted in the slide above, it is commonly perceived that the Pharma corrupts medical journals and doctors.

I suggest people please be calm and consider this view, i.e., doctors are corrupt and have corrupted the journals and Pharma. I know doctors, including other experts, will be upset and angry with me hearing this. But please, before reacting, consider the following facts.

(more…)

Considering the demand for the model spreadsheet I developed, I placed it on my blog for download (link).

The spreadsheet is based on a publication I wrote fifteen years ago to determine/predict plasma drug levels in humans from in vitro drug release (dissolution) testing using the convolution (mathematical) technique (link).

The approach provides a simpler and superior approach for such a purpose, unlike the FDA-suggested, which claims but cannot predict plasma drug levels.  

A suggestion for developing/manufacturing pharmaceuticals quickly and with ease and cost-effectiveness.

People should know that PCR and PCR Tests are two completely different things. Dr. Mullis developed and worked with PCR and not PCR tests. The PCR test is an invention of medical or biology experts who do not know or understand testing science/chemistry. Hence, they created a fraudulent test, which has no value in detecting an unknown and imaginary virus. It is all fake and false.

One may explain the difference between PCR and PCR tests with an analogy. PCR is like a fermentation process. It cannot show if alcohol (ethanol) is produced. However, alcohol production in the broth is tested by an alcohol test or tester (PCR test).

A test can only be developed if the reference standard is available. An alcohol test or tester will be valid as its reference standard (alcohol) exists and is available. However, a PCR test is invalid because its reference standard (virus) is unavailable. The PCR test/testing is a fake and fraudulent concept and practice.

Laboratories would have been shut down, and people would have gone to jail if such practices had been done in science/chemistry (analytical) laboratories. Unfortunately, doctors and their science are protecting this fraudulent activity.

@ “Before widespread vaccines, disease killed nearly half of U.S. children under 5” (link)

The article, by a physician, is full of misinformation and false claims about science. Unfortunately, doctors do not study or are trained in science, so they make incorrect claims. For example;

@ “When a vaccine is developed, it is not immediately available to patients. It goes through many years of rigorous development before it is determined safe for human trials.”

Human or clinical trials are not science. It is a gross misunderstanding.

@ “Anyone can publish their opinion that is not based on science or expertise.”

This is true for physicians who do not study science and make false claims. Sorry! Doctors, please consider correcting your information and knowledge.


Clinical trials – misrepresentation of science (link)
COVID-19 Clinical trials: be watchful (link)
Understanding clinical trials and their outcomes – fake science at its best! (link).
Doctors Lie (link)  
Biology, Virology, Immunology, Medical Science, Etc. Cannot Be Considered Science Subjects (link)
The FDA Committee’s Review of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine: Unscientific, False and Deceitful (link).

Blog Article: Fake And False Science Of Illnesses And Diagnoses (link). FB (link). For convenience, questions are copied below the response.

Response:

@ “… is vacciantion build on the simmilar principle as homeopathy / administering a small doses of alleged poison to treat the illness/”

I have some knowledge and personal experience with homeopathy. Based on this, I would say that they are not similar. To me, they are as similar to comparing electric and gas-powered vehicles because they both require a (small) battery or electric power to start the car. So, they both could be considered electric-powered. However, they are very different in operation – there is no comparison.

Concerning “small doses/amount of alleged poison,” I do not think homeopathy injects poison. On the other hand, I am certain, based on what is available in the literature about vaccines, that they are not in small amounts (compared to homeopathic doses) but certainly significantly large amounts of filth/gunk (potentially poison). I would not suggest anyone take it, considering the science/chemistry aspect of it.

(more…)

Often, one hears such announcements, i.e., FDA approves, concerning drugs and drug products from the FDA and other similar regulatory authorities. People, including physicians, assume that the FDA independently evaluates the products and that the claims (safe and effective) are based on scientific studies or evidence.

Unfortunately, it is not true.

An approved drug product does not mean it is safe and effective, but it only means that it complies with the FDA requirements for putting its label or stamp for approval. In short, approval is for compliance mostly with arbitrary standards and requirements that do not reflect the products’ quality (by extension, safety and efficacy). Prove me wrong!

(more…)

I came across this article “Genetic tracing of market wildlife and viruses at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.” (link)

There are three at least issues with claims made:

  • Genetic virus tracing cannot be done because a virus has not been isolated and characterized. Therefore, the gene cannot be established or traced. The publication makes a false claim about the virus.
  • The virus cartoon in the abstract’s top left corner cannot be true because no sample of the isolated virus is currently available.

    As per the publication, “This study did not generate new unique reagents, but processed data generated for this study can be found in the supplementary files, and reconstructed genomes and phylogenies can be found at the data and code repository associated with this work.” No experimental work was done. But, computer-generated codes/” sequences” were used. Therefore, work was not done with the virus but with computing. (False claim about working with the virus)
  • The publication authors and institutions are related to medical and biological areas/subjects, not science, as commonly understood or implied. The publication may be understood as a science publication, which is incorrect. (link)

Therefore, I stamped it as certified BS’ (link)

medicine, healthcare and pharmacy concept – different pills and capsules of drugs

A drug dissolution test is a test used to establish the quality of a pharmaceutical product, such as a tablet or capsule. This test is conducted because the drug (often called active ingredient) needs to be released from the product for its absorption into the blood to elicit its therapeutic effect.

The test is conducted in place of a clinical test/study called bioavailability or bioequivalence, a pharmacology/pharmacokinetic study type. The test is the backbone of quality assessment of all tablet and capsule products. It is a requirement of worldwide authorities, including the FDA, Health Canada, etc., and pharmacopeias such as USP, BP, EP, etc.

(more…)