Category: Medical Science

I saw this picture (left) and began to think: if the poisonous view of vaccines was already known and circulating in the late nineteenth century, how did vaccine use and recommendation become so widespread—even into modern times? A brief review of the literature shaped my conclusion: physicians are not scientific experts but rather professionals rebranded under a misleading title—medical science, or more precisely, fraudulent science. No wonder we remain trapped in a profession that labels itself “science” when, in truth, it is not.

If this deception was recognized even in its early days, why has it continued to be accepted as legitimate science? The answer lies in the gradual transformation of the medical profession during that period. Until the mid-1800s, physicians were regarded as healers—educated in anatomy, herbs, and observation—but they were not engaged in experimental or physical science. Their practice was practical and empirical, at times even philosophical, but never chemical or quantitative.

(more…)

In recent online discussions, several readers raised thoughtful questions about what defines a scientist and what truly qualifies as science. The conversation touched on topics such as bioelectrochemistry, molecular biology, virology, and the role of chemistry in understanding living systems. The discussion revealed a recurring confusion — that biology and medicine are often mistaken for sciences, when in fact they depend entirely on the principles of chemistry and physics.

Defining a Scientist

A scientist is one who studies physics, chemistry, and mathematics in depth — the foundational disciplines that explain nature and its operations. These subjects deal with matter, energy, and the laws that govern their behavior. Only through such rigorous and quantitative understanding can one explore the workings of nature in a truly scientific way.

(more…)

Thanks for asking my opinion on the topic of autism (link). By education, training, and expertise, I consider myself a scientist — more precisely, a chemist. Chemistry, among all the sciences, is the discipline that deals with the study of natural substances and their functions, including those within the human body. From this fundamental and scientific perspective, chemistry provides the most authentic and authoritative view of how the body functions — and how it malfunctions.

Understanding the human body through chemistry is not simple, but it is the most direct and logical approach to exploring health and disease. The body is an extraordinarily complex chemical machine, yet at its physical level, it operates through remarkably simple and predictable chemical principles. The major components of the body — carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, calcium, and trace elements like iron (in numerous combinations, called molecules) — behave and react just as they do outside the body, following the same laws of chemistry.

The Loss of Chemistry in Medicine

The first step toward understanding illness should always be the study of the body’s chemistry. Unfortunately, over the past five to six decades, the science of medicine has been gradually taken over by medical and pharmaceutical professionals who speak the language of chemistry but are not trained in it. They use chemical terminology, draw chemical formulas, and claim to conduct “scientific” research — yet very few of them have even the basic understanding of what chemistry actually represents.

(more…)

There has been much talk about a recently “discovered” study that claims to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children, as summarized here (the article). The original study may be found here (link).

Based on a survey or so-called epidemiological analysis, it reportedly found that vaccination appears to harm vaccinated children. The data presented indeed suggest this outcome. Logically, there is no reason to continue vaccination programs. The conclusion is self-evident.

However, upon closer reading, one finds manipulation and misleading language throughout the report. The authors describe the study’s “scientifical robustness,” yet there is no science in it in the true sense of the word. Science means experimental work — controlled, measurable, and reproducible — not the simple collection of questionnaire data. At best, this is an observational social survey. The first author of the study, Lois Lamerato, Ph.D., holds a degree in sociology.

(more…)

Why real expertise matters more than borrowed authority

The criticism of science or scientists should not target everyone with a title or degree, but only those who misuse such titles to claim expertise they do not possess. The problem lies not in credentials themselves, but in the false representation of knowledge.

Actual scientists and genuine experts deserve respect. They are the ones who can help resolve the confusion created by self-proclaimed authorities who merely hold positions without understanding. It is essential to separate the pretenders from the professionals — the former seek recognition and lucrative compensation, the latter pursue knowledge and truth.

Now everyone is a science expert or scientist — except the actual scientist.

(more…)

“The greatest spreader of misinformation during the pandemic was the United States government.”
“And that is the weaponization of medical research itself.”
“And public-health officials were intellectually dishonest — they lied to the American people.”
Dr. Martin Makary (FDA Commissioner, link)

So why wasn’t this exposed earlier? Because it was buried inside the medical profession and shielded by the label “medical science” — a claim that protected the system from scrutiny. Criticism was silenced and independent checks were blocked. Meanwhile, today’s experts blame their predecessors while promoting the same “medical science.” The result: bogus diagnoses and fraudulent treatments will continue.

The solution is clear and urgent. Stop treating a corrupt “medical science” as an unquestionable truth. Let physicians use their judgment to guide patient care (writing prescriptions), rather than enforcing one-size-fits-all policies from centralized authorities. End all work masquerading as “medical science/research.” Treat medicines as chemical products that must be manufactured, tested, and regulated transparently by accountable chemical manufacturers — not hidden behind professional privilege or the false authority of so-called “pharmaceutical science.”


Do FDA and USP lie? Of course, all the time! (link)
An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
Claims of vaccines’ relevancy and efficacy – a big fat lie! (link)
The science behind COVID and vaccines! (link)
A Simple And Direct Question RFK Jr Needs To Ask – A Suggestion (link)
Quackery in White Coats (link)
Chemistry, Not Medicine, Defines Science (link)
Critical Review of Medical Authority and Scientific Legitimacy (link)
Questioning Medical Authority: Show Your Science Credentials (link)
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)

COVID and vaccines – ask and listen (link)
Vaccines and the COVID virus (link)
Claims of vaccines’ relevancy and efficacy – a big fat lie! (link)
The science behind COVID and vaccines! (link)
A Simple And Direct Question RFK Jr Needs To Ask – A Suggestion (link)
Quackery in White Coats (link)
Chemistry, Not Medicine, Defines Science (link)
Critical Review of Medical Authority and Scientific Legitimacy (link)
Questioning Medical Authority: Show Your Science Credentials (link)

I read a recent Substack article by Dr. Alejandro Diaz (Immunologist and Global Health Expert) commenting on RFK Jr.’s effort to clean up the medical swamp—a remarkable endeavor in its beginnings. (link)

But I want to focus on one particular part of RFK Jr.’s statement. In an HHS press release, he said:

“We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted.”

Here lies the problem: “reviewed the science and listened to the experts.”

In reality, those so-called “experts” are mostly physicians and public health policymakers—individuals routinely portrayed as scientists but who, in fact, are not. The irony is that many of those celebrated as “science experts” lack any formal scientific credentials. This is perhaps the most critical, yet consistently overlooked, element of fraud within the healthcare profession—something even RFK Jr. and others fail to recognize.

Take physicians, for example. They hold an M.D.—a professional degree, not a scientific one. It does not provide rigorous training in foundational sciences, particularly chemistry—the very discipline central to medicine, including vaccines. The vaccine disaster did not stem from science itself, but from non-scientists masquerading as scientists, conducting experimental studies that made no sense. Every so-called study on viruses or viral illnesses proceeded without an actual virus sample or a demonstrable illness. Instead, conclusions leaned almost entirely on the PCR test—a scientifically invalid tool, irrelevant, inaccurate, and unreliable—for detecting both the “virus” and its supposed illness. This is, at best, profound scientific ignorance and, at worst, deliberate fraud carried out under the banner of expertise or science.

In this light, RFK Jr.’s efforts stand as a remarkable contribution toward exposing fraudulent practices at the CDC and within the medical profession. Still, while his work is valuable, it is not grounded in true scientific research or review, but rather in his investigative efforts, aided by sympathetic physicians.

If genuine science had guided health policy, there would never have been “virus” claims to begin with—because viruses, as categorized, have never been shown to exist. And if the virus does not exist, then vaccines against it are impossible by definition. The vaccine tragedy unfolded precisely because fake “science,” conducted and endorsed by physicians without real scientific credentials, replaced actual science.

And now comes the so-called “next step”:

“These statements reflect a dramatic shift in federal vaccine strategy—away from mRNA and toward platforms like whole-virus vaccines and protein-based technologies.”

This makes clear that they intend to remain entrenched in the vaccine business. But as I have already described, there is no virus—and therefore no need, nor even the possibility, of developing any treatment or vaccine. What we are witnessing is not science but medical fantasy.

The author of the article, an immunologist (a branch of biology—hardly a science in the true sense here), is simply working to sustain their virus-based nonsense and pseudo-scientific narrative. RFK Jr. must remain vigilant against such insidious attempts to promote false science and to divert attention from the urgent task of exposing and dismantling fraudulent medical and biological claims that have misled the world.

It is not just the concept that fails, but the logistics as well. To test a vaccine, one must separate an “infected” population from a “healthy” one. That requires a validated test. Yet no validated test exists, because there is no established reference standard for a virus. Therefore, properly designed clinical trials for vaccines are impossible to conduct. What continues instead is the endless beating of a dead horse: viruses, vaccines, and vaccination—vehicles designed only to extract enormous sums of money for fake science and fake scientists. The result is nothing more than a colossal waste of human and financial resources.

And then comes the hollow claim:

“I believe the President and his team at HHS have a momentous opportunity to truly reform these institutions and have a lasting impact on America’s public health.”

This suggests that no lessons have been learned from the catastrophic COVID-19 episode. Continuing down this path—with viruses and vaccines—only ensures that history will repeat itself, likely on an even larger scale.

It is time to stop. There is no such thing as “medical science.” There is no virus, and there never was. Therefore, there is no need for vaccines, nor could there ever be an effective one. To proceed with this charade is not progress but the continuation of fraudulent science—an enterprise that harms people, wastes resources, and corrupts the very meaning of science itself.

Quackery in White Coats (link)
Chemistry, Not Medicine, Defines Science (link)
Critical Review of Medical Authority and Scientific Legitimacy (link)
Questioning Medical Authority: Show Your Science Credentials (link)

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. In general, I agree with your comment and conclusion—except for the last sentence: “A formal education in a topic doesn’t guarantee you are right.” (link)

I often hear this view, and frankly, it troubles me. Yes, many scientists wrongly treat their education as a seal of correctness. However, a more significant issue is that non-scientists often forcefully impose their views with absolute certainty. This is the real tragedy: those who have studied and worked in genuine science are placed on the same level as those who have not. People without scientific training—including physicians—often assume the authority of science without having been scientists themselves.

(more…)

“A re-analysis of the Pfizer and Moderna trials, published in Vaccine by eminent, independent scientists—including BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi—revealed that from the very beginning, the rate of harm in these trials was alarming. According to their findings, you were two to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the COVID-19 vaccine.” Paraphrased from Dr. Malhotra’s recent presentation (link).

Impressive! After four years of vaccine rollout—and with significant harms now being reported—Dr. Aseem Malhotra, once a loud and loyal supporter of vaccines (including the COVID-19 vaccine), has suddenly reinvented himself as a leading activist against them. Remember, this is the same man who proudly proclaimed: “Some of the greatest achievements in medicine are traditional vaccines, no doubt.” (link)

(more…)