Category: Pharmacetical

I listened to Dr. Bret Weinstein’s response to Piers Morgan’s question in this 1:34-minute video clip and noted several errors or unsupported claims (link). For example:

He stated: “… in an effort to provide immunity against COVID-19 …”

There is no scientifically valid evidence that COVID-19 exists. It is a belief that COVID-19 is caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2. However, there is no evidence that this virus has ever been shown to exist. Therefore, a disease attributed to this virus cannot exist.

Dr. Weinstein is an evolutionary biologist or biology expert, not in the true sense of the word a scientist—particularly in the field of substance isolation and characterization, like viruses. That domain belongs to science proper, specifically chemistry, not biology. Hence, not only is he making a false statement, but he may not even realize it. He should reconsider his position on this topic.

(more…)

Doctors (physicians), please share your credentials in science and in conducting scientific research, including your education and expertise in true scientific subjects such as chemistry. After all, your work primarily involves research on medicines, which are chemicals, including:

  • Proteins (enzymes, antibodies, receptors)
  • Amino acids
  • Carbohydrates (glucose, glycogen, polysaccharides)
  • Lipids (cholesterol, triglycerides, phospholipids)
  • Vitamins (A, D, E, K, C, B-complex)
  • Minerals (calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium, zinc)
  • Neurotransmitters (dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine)
  • Nucleotides (ATP, GTP, cAMP)
  • Cellular organelles (mitochondria, ribosomes, lysosomes)
  • Structural proteins (collagen, keratin, elastin)
  • Genetic material (DNA, RNA, genes, etc.)

Additionally, please include your education and expertise in testing, including test development, validation, and research processes.

They have no such credentials—can anyone prove otherwise?

What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)

I read Dr. Robert Malone’s recent article with great interest (link). His recognition of the deep flaws in the U.S. regulatory medical system—including research funding, approval processes, and oversight—is both timely and important. However, his critique largely reflects the common physician’s viewpoint, blaming bureaucracy and government agencies such as the FDA, CDC, and NIH for the dysfunction. This perspective, while partly valid, misses the core of the issue.

The problem isn’t just bureaucratic mismanagement. The root of the dysfunction is the fraudulent framework of so-called “medical science” itself—a system run by professionals who claim scientific authority without actually practicing science. Dr. Malone is beginning to see aspects of this breakdown, but he stops short of identifying its real cause: the widespread lack of scientific literacy among medical professionals, particularly in areas where rigorous scientific analysis and measurement are required, such as pharmaceutical quality assessment.

(more…)

Anyone who claims to be a science representative or expert, especially physicians, must disclose their credentials (academic background, expertise, hands-on work experience, etc.) to support their claims about science. An M.D. degree does not qualify one as having scientific knowledge or expertise, because it is a typical non-science undergraduate degree. Association with so-called medical or biology institutions and/or being a member of expert committees does not qualify one as a science expert or scientist. It is fraudulent.

Does it not show that doctors have lost their professional credibility, and the public is taking the prescriptions of medication into their own hands? In reality, I would not recommend such a practice, as it could have some unintended harmful consequences. However, under the circumstances, it is the most practical approach; the public has no other choice, as doctors have misled and lied to them.

As I have been describing for a long time, physicians’ claims have been fraudulent, regarding science experts or scientists. Their diagnoses and treatments have no support or relevance to science or scientific research. They have no formal education or knowledge of the science of medicine and its research, which is primarily based on science (chemistry). Hence, the medical fraternity employs ritual-based practices but promotes them as science. They imposed these lies and false claims of science under the government’s authority, which they dominate under the guise of independent science experts and scientists. The public has no venue to express or be heard about their sufferings from illnesses or medical treatments, or (mal) practices.

New CDC Vaccine Panel’s Upcoming Voting  (link)
Drs. Malone And McCullough May Like To Address This Concern (link)
It is worth noting an uncommon and unpopular fact about HHS/FDA/NIH (link)

Please read and/or listen here (link, link)

I have been telling you that they are not scientists but doctors who do not study science or are not trained in conducting scientific research as part of their education and training, and it is not limited to NIH, but all over, including FDA, CDC, CDER, USP, etc.

Doctors’ Science and Medicines – Malpractice! (link)
COVID-19: The virus does not exist – it is confirmed! (link)
Who Is Corrupt: Doctors Or Pharma? Check It Yourself (link)
Vaccines: Useless But Dangerous Soup/Gunk That Must Be Purged (link)
Vaccine Science: Nonsense And BS! (link)
What is science, and who are scientists? link
 My training and expertise – people ask! link

If this observation or assumption is accurate, then my view is correct that cancer is a misdiagnosed illness. It is a microbial (parasitic) infection. Therefore, ivermectin seems to work as it is a drug usually prescribed to treat parasitic infections (link).

“Ivermectin is an anti-parasite medication used to treat parasitic diseases. It is FDA approved for use in humans to treat a variety of parasitic infections including parasitic worms, hookworm and whipworm.” (link.)

Please have a look at the actual science (https://bioanalyticx.com/medical-science-and-its-fraud/)

More on my view:
Is Cancer An Illness Or An Imaginary (Misdiagnosed) Thing Like Viral Infections? link
Turbo Cancer and Ivermectin and Fenbendazole – A Good Match (link)

Considering the demand for the model spreadsheet I developed, I placed it on my blog for download (link).

The spreadsheet is based on a publication I wrote fifteen years ago to determine/predict plasma drug levels in humans from in vitro drug release (dissolution) testing using the convolution (mathematical) technique (link).

The approach provides a simpler and superior approach for such a purpose, unlike the FDA-suggested, which claims but cannot predict plasma drug levels.  

A suggestion for developing/manufacturing pharmaceuticals quickly and with ease and cost-effectiveness.

A few months ago, I wrote, “ An M.D. degree is a typical non-science undergraduate degree, and holders of such cannot be considered science experts or scientists. Their (“science”) institutions have to be shut down. There is no other option.”

“Seek an audit of the claims of the so-called medical and pharmaceutical sciences; it is the issue (fraud), while viruses, virology, and vaccines are secondary to it.” link

I believe the audit that is needed has started (link). Thank you, President Trump.