Category: Pharmacetical
While surfing the internet, I came across this subheading, “Romans Believed In Witchcraft.” Reading the short paragraph paused me thinking about the current science practices of physicians.
For a long time, especially for the past four years of COVID-19 and its vaccine claims and activities, I have been convinced that the practices of physicians are simply modern-day versions of Romans’ witchcraft by replacing the word “witchcraft” with “Medical Science.”
As a science learner for practically all my adult life (50+ years) and a practicing scientist for 35+ years, I can clearly see that modern-day physicians do not study, learn, or practice science. Their claims about science are false and fraudulent.
Their education is based on a typical non-science undergraduate degree (M.D. or equivalent). Their education and training do not teach them science, but to memorize terminologies from actual science/chemistry books to use them ritualistically, making up their “modern science” (witchcraft).
They are dressed in modern versions of ritualistic costumes, in white or blue, with airtight outfits containing masks, filters, and oxygen cylinders. They stand by some fancy instruments. I know from experience that they do not know what these instruments are supposed to do or how to work with them properly.
With this dressing up, they try to show they protect themselves and the public from invisible particles/viruses (the modern name for witches), represented by culturing and CPE (cytopathic effects), isolation, sequencing, clinical trials, etc. (magical texts), balls with spikes, some gibberish drawings, chemical structures and reactions, photographs of cultures/filth (ritual figurines)), and expert opinions; like peer-reviewed studies, spike-proteins, etc.(spells). And on top of all this, using “medicines” like vaccines, chemotherapy, etc. (poisons or magical potions)
In short, keep the above thoughts in mind when reading and listening to modern-day medical science/scientists – they truly are witch doctors. May Almighty save us all from their science practices. Ameen!
From internet:
Romans Believed In Witchcraft:
In ancient Rome, witchcraft and magic were deeply ingrained in society—both respected and feared. Despite attempts to regulate magic through the law, it was widespread, and many Romans sought out practitioners like witches or sorcerers to help them.
Common practices included the use of magical texts, binding curses, ritual figurines, and spells. In the Republic and Imperial periods, people even used poisons that were considered to be like magical potions to achieve specific goals like keeping people quiet or providing protection. (link )
If someone claims to be a doctor and is caught practicing medicine without proper academic credentials and required registration, authorities deal with such a person promptly and harshly. Most likely, the person would face heavy fines and go to jail for extended periods for the fraud.
However, nothing happens when a doctor claims to be a scientist and practices scientific research without relevant academic credentials or experience/expertise. Instead, doctors get large sums of money/funding for their “scientific research” from authorities/agencies, inventing fake illnesses, viruses, etc., and irrelevant treatments (vaccines, pharmaceuticals, etc.). Why is it so? This anomaly (fake and false science) needs to be addressed. An audit and accountability in this respect is urgently required and should be done by actual science/chemistry experts or scientists, as medicines and their interactions are chemicals and chemistry-based, respectively.
In a major ruling, the Supreme Court sharply reduced the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretation. (link.)
The court overruled its landmark 1984 decision, which gave rise to the doctrine known as the Chevron doctrine. Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the Agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable. In a 35-page ruling by Chief Justice John Roberts, the justices rejected that doctrine, calling it “fundamentally misguided.” Continue here
First, people should understand the difference between medicines and medicinal products. It’s critical, and many/most, including doctors, may not know it.
A medicine is mostly a pure chemical (powder or liquid). On the other hand, the medicinal product is a package, e.g., tablets (pills), capsules, suspensions, syrups, ointments, etc. These “packages” are to deliver medications to the body conveniently. It is just like juice or milk in cartons. The actual or needed substance is the juice or milk, and a carton or package delivers/transfers its content, then goes to waste.
Many (non-active or non-medicinal) components are mixed and/or compressed with actual medicines to develop these packages (e.g., tablets). Once someone takes the tablet (package) orally, the actual drug/medicine comes out of it and gets absorbed, and the rest is a waste and is supposed to come out of the body unaltered and without causing any harm.
However, if one takes the drug/medicines, say acetaminophen for Tylenol as a powder in an equivalent amount and mix with some water and drinks it, they will have their dose of medicine. They may act faster than their packaged versions, as they do not get to dissolve in the body as they are pre-dissolved.
Very important—medicines/drugs obtained from chemical suppliers (chemists) will be genuine and have much better assurance of quality and purity as they are certified against authentic (reference) standards.
On the other hand, drug products are only available from pharmaceutical manufacturing or pharmacies (a twisted version of chemical manufacturing), without any testing against (reference) standards, only based on a claim that they are approved by FDA/CDC/USP (the pharmaceutical equivalent of CDC) and other regulatory agencies, but NOT tested against any authentic (scientific) standard—not many know this.
A chemical manufacturer should also manufacture drug products. Chemical manufacturing is purely mixing chemicals/molecules (often very simple molecules using simple processes). In that case, the products will be of higher quality and far cheaper than their “pharmaceutical” version—and with the science behind them.
In short, a direct from (chemical/medicine) manufacturers to consumers/patients may be practiced. It would be a superior approach, eliminating the involvement of others, especially those having no training and expertise in science/chemistry.
Someone asked how to address the issues with medicines and related medical (doctors’) sciences.
I suggest moving the chemicals-based (allopathic) medicines away from doctors and pharmacists, including all testing (diagnostic or otherwise). They are doing chemists’ work without relevant training and education, making disastrous blunders and ruining people’s health. The subject has to be managed by appropriately educated and experienced scientists/chemists. All development, manufacturing, testing, approval, and marketing of medicines/chemicals must be guided by chemistry experts.
Doctors should provide the service they are trained for, i.e., they should provide standardized prescriptions by observing symptoms and clinical test results. They should not claim to be science experts or scientists or be involved in scientific (experimental) research.
