Category: Pharmacetical

It is a common perception among the public and experts, particularly in health and medical areas, that having a Ph.D. makes one a scientist. This is a very wrong view or assumption.

A Ph.D. degree is a higher level of education and training after an undergraduate level. With a Ph.D. degree, the person may be considered an expert in the subject. For example, a Ph.D. in history or literature would not make a person a scientist but an expert in the subject.

Similarly, a Ph.D. in medicine does not make a physician a scientist but an expert in practicing medicine, which is generally training and education in writing prescriptions based on observing symptoms and reading diagnostic test results.

Being a scientist means having extensive and exhaustive education and training in science. It is ascribed to studying the fundamental units of matter or bodies such as atoms, molecules, sub-atomic particles, etc., that is, the study of physics and/or chemistry with mathematics (link) using validated tests.

Anyone who does not study and practice chemistry and/or physics (with mathematics) cannot claim to be a scientist or science expert. Such a claim should be considered quackery or fraudulent and treated according to the laws.

Medical science, pharmaceutical science, health science, biology, virology, immunology, microbiology, molecular biology, pharmacology, pharmacy, etc, are a few examples of fake and false science.

Viruses, vaccines, virology, medical science, health science, pharmaceutical science, etc., and related institutions, including the CDC, FDA, Health Canada, etc., have practically died. For all practical purposes, they are now zombies and are there to scare people to protect their own interests and enterprises.

The contributions (“hittings”) from actual science/chemistry have virtually killed them as all of their claims were based on chemistry terminologies/vocabulary but falsely and fraudulently described and promoted as science. These so-called activities have been promoted by those, in particular, physicians, who do not study or know science but make it up for their self-interest. The lies have been exposed.

The actual science/chemistry will most certainly play a major role in characterizing illnesses (if they exist) and medicines. It will provide a much better understanding of chemical-based medicines and help alternatives. In this regard, a much better future for alternative medicines than allopathic ones is anticipated.

Consider familiarizing yourself with science/chemistry as much as possible. It will not only help you get out of the virus/vaccine nonsense but will help you take care of your body much better than physicians. They use very potent and dangerous chemicals (in the name of medicines like vaccines, chemotherapy, etc.) without knowing or learning anything about chemicals other than their names, mostly their commercial or brand names. 

Do not be intimidated by the pretentious use of complex vocabulary, chemical structures, reaction diagrams, etc, often described by doctors or medical “scientists.” One does not need an extended knowledge of science/chemistry; some basics will do wonders. I provide this and explain it in the book (link). If you need further clarification and help, I can always try and help further.  

medicine, healthcare and pharmacy concept – different pills and capsules of drugs

A drug dissolution test is a test used to establish the quality of a pharmaceutical product, such as a tablet or capsule. This test is conducted because the drug (often called active ingredient) needs to be released from the product for its absorption into the blood to elicit its therapeutic effect.

The test is conducted in place of a clinical test/study called bioavailability or bioequivalence, a pharmacology/pharmacokinetic study type. The test is the backbone of quality assessment of all tablet and capsule products. It is a requirement of worldwide authorities, including the FDA, Health Canada, etc., and pharmacopeias such as USP, BP, EP, etc.

(more…)

While surfing the internet, I came across this subheading, “Romans Believed In Witchcraft.” Reading the short paragraph paused me thinking about the current science practices of physicians.

For a long time, especially for the past four years of COVID-19 and its vaccine claims and activities, I have been convinced that the practices of physicians are simply modern-day versions of Romans’ witchcraft by replacing the word “witchcraft” with “Medical Science.”

As a science learner for practically all my adult life (50+ years) and a practicing scientist for 35+ years, I can clearly see that modern-day physicians do not study, learn, or practice science. Their claims about science are false and fraudulent.

Their education is based on a typical non-science undergraduate degree (M.D. or equivalent). Their education and training do not teach them science, but to memorize terminologies from actual science/chemistry books to use them ritualistically, making up their “modern science” (witchcraft).

They are dressed in modern versions of ritualistic costumes, in white or blue, with airtight outfits containing masks, filters, and oxygen cylinders. They stand by some fancy instruments. I know from experience that they do not know what these instruments are supposed to do or how to work with them properly.

With this dressing up, they try to show they protect themselves and the public from invisible particles/viruses (the modern name for witches), represented by culturing and CPE (cytopathic effects), isolation, sequencing, clinical trials, etc. (magical texts), balls with spikes, some gibberish drawings, chemical structures and reactions, photographs of cultures/filth (ritual figurines)), and expert opinions; like peer-reviewed studies, spike-proteins, etc.(spells). And on top of all this, using “medicines” like vaccines, chemotherapy, etc. (poisons or magical potions)

In short, keep the above thoughts in mind when reading and listening to modern-day medical science/scientists – they truly are witch doctors. May Almighty save us all from their science practices. Ameen!

From internet:

Romans Believed In Witchcraft:

In ancient Rome, witchcraft and magic were deeply ingrained in society—both respected and feared. Despite attempts to regulate magic through the law, it was widespread, and many Romans sought out practitioners like witches or sorcerers to help them.

Common practices included the use of magical texts, binding curses, ritual figurines, and spells. In the Republic and Imperial periods, people even used poisons that were considered to be like magical potions to achieve specific goals like keeping people quiet or providing protection. (link )

If someone claims to be a doctor and is caught practicing medicine without proper academic credentials and required registration, authorities deal with such a person promptly and harshly. Most likely, the person would face heavy fines and go to jail for extended periods for the fraud.

However, nothing happens when a doctor claims to be a scientist and practices scientific research without relevant academic credentials or experience/expertise. Instead, doctors get large sums of money/funding for their “scientific research” from authorities/agencies, inventing fake illnesses, viruses, etc., and irrelevant treatments (vaccines, pharmaceuticals, etc.). Why is it so? This anomaly (fake and false science) needs to be addressed. An audit and accountability in this respect is urgently required and should be done by actual science/chemistry experts or scientists, as medicines and their interactions are chemicals and chemistry-based, respectively.

  • An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
  • Doctors’ Role In Illness And Treatment Development And Invention Needs To Stop (link)
  • What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
  • Science-Based Medicines (link).

In a major ruling, the Supreme Court sharply reduced the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretation. (link.)

The court overruled its landmark 1984 decision, which gave rise to the doctrine known as the Chevron doctrine. Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the Agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable. In a 35-page ruling by Chief Justice John Roberts, the justices rejected that doctrine, calling it “fundamentally misguided.” Continue here

First, people should understand the difference between medicines and medicinal products. It’s critical, and many/most, including doctors, may not know it.

A medicine is mostly a pure chemical (powder or liquid). On the other hand, the medicinal product is a package, e.g., tablets (pills), capsules, suspensions, syrups, ointments, etc. These “packages” are to deliver medications to the body conveniently. It is just like juice or milk in cartons. The actual or needed substance is the juice or milk, and a carton or package delivers/transfers its content, then goes to waste.

Many (non-active or non-medicinal) components are mixed and/or compressed with actual medicines to develop these packages (e.g., tablets). Once someone takes the tablet (package) orally, the actual drug/medicine comes out of it and gets absorbed, and the rest is a waste and is supposed to come out of the body unaltered and without causing any harm.

However, if one takes the drug/medicines, say acetaminophen for Tylenol as a powder in an equivalent amount and mix with some water and drinks it, they will have their dose of medicine. They may act faster than their packaged versions, as they do not get to dissolve in the body as they are pre-dissolved.

Very important—medicines/drugs obtained from chemical suppliers (chemists) will be genuine and have much better assurance of quality and purity as they are certified against authentic (reference) standards.

On the other hand, drug products are only available from pharmaceutical manufacturing or pharmacies (a twisted version of chemical manufacturing), without any testing against (reference) standards, only based on a claim that they are approved by FDA/CDC/USP (the pharmaceutical equivalent of CDC) and other regulatory agencies, but NOT tested against any authentic (scientific) standard—not many know this. 

A chemical manufacturer should also manufacture drug products. Chemical manufacturing is purely mixing chemicals/molecules (often very simple molecules using simple processes). In that case, the products will be of higher quality and far cheaper than their “pharmaceutical” version—and with the science behind them.

In short, a direct from (chemical/medicine) manufacturers to consumers/patients may be practiced. It would be a superior approach, eliminating the involvement of others, especially those having no training and expertise in science/chemistry.