Category: Science

The safety assessment of the vaccine concept/requirement reflects putting a cart in front of the horse. It is a gross misunderstanding of the subject (science) of medicine development and assessment.

As I described earlier (link), the safety assessment of any medicine comes after assessing its effectiveness. If a medication’s effectiveness or efficacy has not been shown, then there is no point in doing or seeking a safety assessment. The product would not come to the market.

Contrary to common belief, the efficacy of the vaccines has never been determined, i.e., the vaccines, including COVID-19, have never been tested against the viruses (as virus samples are unavailable); hence, vaccines and their vaccination are false and fraudulent practices (link). They need to be stopped immediately.

Suggesting their safety assessment defies logic but supports the vaccination, with potential harm to recipients.

Please consider seeking advice and help from people with knowledge and expertise in science/chemistry working with medicines (chemicals), including vaccines, avoiding further damaging people’s health due to ignorance, practicing false and fraudulent science, and unethical vaccinations (link).   

@ … they [physcians] know what you [the people, even the actual scientists] couldn’t possibly know.” That is the sales pitch doctors use as priests of the church of Medicine (“Science”) link

On the other hand, these priests have never studied or practiced science (or medicines/chemicals) that they sell. Their education and training are based on a non-science undergraduate degree to write prescriptions, similar to a clerical job.

Watch the video, recommended, but please focus only on the message.

Viruses/Vaccines: Disaster Manufactured by Medical Experts link
Selling Of Medicines In The Future – Suggestions link
Few Dare To Announce Unwelcome Truth link
People Losing Trust In Medical Professionals; Why? link
What is science, and who are scientists? link
 My training and expertise – people ask! link

A few months ago, I wrote, “ An M.D. degree is a typical non-science undergraduate degree, and holders of such cannot be considered science experts or scientists. Their (“science”) institutions have to be shut down. There is no other option.”

“Seek an audit of the claims of the so-called medical and pharmaceutical sciences; it is the issue (fraud), while viruses, virology, and vaccines are secondary to it.” link

I believe the audit that is needed has started (link). Thank you, President Trump.

(link)

Is an axe coming? I believe an axe (sledgehammer?) should be coming.

The agency is based on doctors’ science, which is fake and false, as doctors do not study or are not trained in science and scientific research. The agency has lost its credibility as a science-based organization during the (fake) pandemic based on a fake (scientifically invalid and fraudulent) test and developing or accepting a vaccine use without testing them against the virus or its illness or infection.

People Losing Trust In Medical Professionals; Why? (link).

People trusted the medical profession and professionals (physicians) and believed in them as science followers or scientists. Considering their claims as scientific, people accepted that viruses and pandemics exist, that vaccines (developed by physicians) are needed, and that they work to treat illnesses (pandemic) like COVID-19.

Unfortunately, they (physicians) lied. They never studied or worked with science. All the claims, like virus isolation or existence, (PCR) testing, pandemic, vaccines, lab-leak theories, gain of function research, etc., have no scientific validity and are fictional narratives.

So, the issues should be addressed accordingly.

Vaccines Against Viruses – How? (link)
Physicians as Scientists: A Hideous Claim: (link)
Misinformation By Physicians – A Need For An Audit (link).
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)

(link)

I would agree with such an observation that Ivermectin and Fenbendazole can be treatments for so-called tubo-cancer. I believe “turbo-cancer” is a misdiagnosed illness (based on doctors’ science – the fake science) when it could very well be a microbial infection. As the two medicines mentioned above are known for their anti-parasitic effect, it is not surprising they provide a remedy for the disease, a commonly noted side effect of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Ivermectin and COVID-19 Controversy – Why? (link)
Why Do People Get Sick – A View! (Part 2) (link)
Why do people get sick – a view! (link)

link

Neither do you, Joe Rogan. I am sorry. Even those who differed and considered themselves scientists were not scientists and provided false science narratives. Would you give me a chance to explain what science is and where medical experts went wrong?

What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)


Headline: EXCLUSIVE: FDA lab uncovers excess DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines (link)

It is a substack article based on “research” conducted by high school students and published in a High School Science Journal. (link).

The conclusion from the article is reasonable, i.e., the vaccine may be contaminated with DNA, which is not new information, as I noted in my article more than a year ago. (link).

The rest of the claims made are quite exaggerated or borderline false, like:

“An explosive new study conducted within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) own laboratory has revealed excessively high levels of DNA contamination in Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.”

There is nothing explosive here. However, the study appears to have been conducted within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) laboratory. I would not consider it like this – a research study from an FDA laboratory. It is a high school science project where students learn techniques. It is not an FDA study; there is no authorship from the FDA. The authors of the article clearly state

“The content of this publication only contains the opinions of the authors and does not reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services.

Many or most claims are speculative. So, I would leave it here.

In short, the article describes a well-known aspect of DNA contamination of mRNA vaccines. The toxicity of vaccines due to DNA is a weak or unproven argument, but observing DNA suggests potential bacterial contamination causing vaccine toxicity.

From FB (link, ref. @Jason Pickels)

I agree with your undecidedness or perhaps confusion. The reason is that most narratives in the medical area (“science”) are based on biology, which is mistakenly considered science. In this regard, most claims are opinions or, at best, observations (social surveys), not scientific. Hence, people, in general, are suffering from “illnesses” because of misdiagnoses and mistreatments.

Vaccines and vaccinations are false treatments because they are treatments for viruses (a biological opinion or guess) that have not been shown to exist. So, treatment is not treating anything but ends up resulting in poor health because of side effects, in some cases extremely bad.

On the other hand, believing and promoting that germs are “friendly” and do not or cannot cause harm is also a biological opinion or guess, and not treating it as such is also a misdiagnosis leading to bad health and possibly death.

There is hope that these misdiagnoses could be addressed using actual science/chemistry, as the body is based on chemical molecules and reactions, physiology).

So, please do not be carried away with opinions and guesses; focus on actual science/chemistry and seek help from those who know actual science/chemistry. I do not pretend that learning and understanding science/chemistry will be easy. It is a challenging subject but doable with time and effort.

I have been writing about this topic for some time now. You can get help from my writing. If you have questions or require clarifications, I will happily address them as time allows.

Best of luck.

https://bioanalyticx.com/what-is-science-and-who-are-scientists/

Why Do People Get Sick – A View! (Part 2)

https://bioanalyticx.com/my-training-and-expertise-people-ask/

https://bioanalyticx.com/biology-virology-immunology-medical-science-etc-cannot-be-considered-science-subjects/


From FB (link, re: Caroline Oakshett)

I appreciate your valuable thoughts and input.

I understand there is great skepticism about the political leadership’s honesty in dealing with the vaccine issues. Perhaps you may be correct that there may be a smoke screen without anything genuine or honest happening.

This time, however, I sense something is different. In the past, such claims were dominated mainly by medical experts (physicians). It seems the role of medical experts is diminished.

Two names that are mentioned for the upcoming administration in the health area are RFK Jr. and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

Although Dr. Bhattacharya has training in medicine (M.D.), his main expertise is in economics and management.

“Jayanta Bhattacharya (born 1968) is an American physician-scientist and economist who is a professor of medicine, economics, and health research policy at Stanford University. He is the director of Stanford’s Center for Demography and Economics of Health and Aging. His research focuses on the economics of health care.” (link).

I consider them both outsiders of the medical field and more towards the business or management side, implying trust in medical experts has diminished in the government. Similarly, Elon Musk is an outsider to healthcare and would probably assist them with his business/management acumen.

I also think that, in general, the public and probably the leadership have lost the trust in medical experts (physicians), knowing, as I often emphasize, that they lied about their credentials and expertise in conducting scientific research. They never studied and trained in science but present themselves as “followers of science” or science experts (scientists) in conducting laboratory-based scientific research. I doubt they will ever recover from the damage of their false claim.

Given this background, I like to be hopeful that there will be a good shakeup of the medical-pharmaceutical complex for the better this time.

Time will tell, and I am hopeful.