Physcians’ Science vs Actual Science (link)
Category: Science
Blog Article: Fake And False Science Of Illnesses And Diagnoses (link). FB (link). For convenience, questions are copied below the response.
Response:
@ “… is vacciantion build on the simmilar principle as homeopathy / administering a small doses of alleged poison to treat the illness/”
I have some knowledge and personal experience with homeopathy. Based on this, I would say that they are not similar. To me, they are as similar to comparing electric and gas-powered vehicles because they both require a (small) battery or electric power to start the car. So, they both could be considered electric-powered. However, they are very different in operation – there is no comparison.
Concerning “small doses/amount of alleged poison,” I do not think homeopathy injects poison. On the other hand, I am certain, based on what is available in the literature about vaccines, that they are not in small amounts (compared to homeopathic doses) but certainly significantly large amounts of filth/gunk (potentially poison). I would not suggest anyone take it, considering the science/chemistry aspect of it.
Currently, two views are commonly used to explain illnesses. One is that people get sick by the presence/infection of some invisible particles (viruses). Second, illness reflects the body’s detoxification process to eliminate toxins. Doctors and health experts often promote and support both views, implied as science-based.
Note that these are opinions or narratives presented as theories to sound factual and scientific. However, these theories are not supported by actual science. Both viruses and toxins (cell debris) are imaginary and fictional objects/substances. No scientific evidence supports the presence or existence of such entities and their relevance.
The only way to make such a claim scientifically valid and acceptable is that the so-called viruses or the toxins must be isolated, purified, and fully (physically and chemically) characterized, and these must be available as such in vials or test tubes. Nothing of this sort happens or is available. Hence, all these claims are scientifically baseless.
Use caution when considering doctors’ (medical and health experts’) science as actual science. There is no medical/health science. It is a made-up science (fake and false) based on personal opinions and narratives.
A better alternative to understanding and addressing illnesses is to try to understand the body’s chemistry, i.e., the working of chemicals (in and outside the body). It is essential to note that the body is built on chemicals (fats, proteins, sugars, minerals, vitamins, water, oxygen, etc), and these are supplied by food and the environment. An imbalance of these can result in issues (called illnesses) and should easily be addressed by appropriate testing and adjusting chemical imbalances. Please consider studying the science of chemicals (chemistry) or seek help from science/chemistry experts.
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
“Trump says RFK Jr. will investigate discredited link between vaccines and autism.” (link).
From a scientific perspective, it is much better to investigate if vaccine use is valid, justified, or beneficial.
One should remember that vaccines are promoted as a treatment against viruses and/or their infections/illnesses. However, the issue is that viruses have not been shown to exist, so there cannot be their illnesses. Therefore, vaccines cannot be (or have not) been tested against viruses or their illnesses. Hence, vaccines are useless medicines/treatments but cause numerous severe side effects. As an example, consider the recent claim of virus (COVID-19) illness/infection/pandemic (all fake) and its fake (vaccine) development and treatment, resulting in numerous side effects, along with enormous financial/economic damage.
The issue needs to be examined from the scientific perspective, seeking input/help from experts in science/chemistry, as medicines, including vaccines, are chemicals. Unfortunately, it has been dealt with by non-science experts such as physicians or medical experts.
For further reading:
COVID-19: The virus does not exist – it is confirmed! (link)
Vaccines efficacy (link)
The FDA Committee’s Review of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine: Unscientific, False and Deceitful (link).
France Identifies 53 Unique COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals (link).
An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
Comments on the article “Do Viruses Exist?” by Michael Palmer, M.D. and Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. (link).
Dr. Marty Makary’s YouTube Video (link)
What is science, and who are scientists? (link).
“An Extraordinary Step’: White House Mulls ‘Preemptive’ Pardon for Fauci” (link)
One thing is clear: fraudulent activities have occurred, as has been pointed out repeatedly through my blog (link) and the Book “Slaying the Virus and Vaccine Dragon” (link). For example, (1) False and fraudulent story of the existence of the COVID-19 virus (and others); (2) Use and promotion of fraudulent testing (PCR, Antigen, etc.); (3) Development of vaccines and declaring their efficacy without testing them against the virus, infection and or its patients.
The other most critical aspect is that physicians and medical experts, internal and external to governments worldwide, claim to be science experts (scientists) when their training and education are based only on a non-science undergraduate degree.
https://bioanalyticx.com/an-m-d-degree-is-not-a-science-degree/
https://bioanalyticx.com/dr-marty-makarys-youtube-video/
https://bioanalyticx.com/52-top-leading-eminent-scientists-how-and-why/
I watched the video for a few minutes and got frustrated and bored. This is another video of the recent fad about the past wrong restrictions on using cholesterol/fat, which is now considered good. (link).
The reason for my frustration is the comments he made:
(@0:35) “If we use good scientific studies, then we shine as a profession …”
(@12:53) “When you’re a scientist like myself, we do lots of research on my team at John Hopkins …”
But he is educated and trained as a physician with an M.D. degree, not a scientist (link, link, link, and more). I can clearly see that most of his comments are not based on (lab-based or experimental) science but opinions with descriptors, such as “maybe,” “possibly,” and “potentially.” The rest is for you to judge for yourself. I could not continue for another hour.
Like a celebrity, Dr. Aseem Malhotra is a high-profile physician (cardiologist) from the U.K. Recently, I had an opportunity to watch his interview on YouTube (link). I am disturbed by his advice about maintaining good health.
The first part of his interview is mostly about vaccines, particularly COVID-19. He is highly critical of COVID-19 vaccines, presumably because of a family incident. Otherwise, he fully supports vaccines and vaccination, saying, “Some of the greatest achievements in medicine are traditional vaccines, no doubt.”
(more…)
Dr. Aseem Malhotra On Vaccines
I just finished watching this two-hour-long interview. I am sorry to say I am thoroughly saddened and disappointed by it (link)
However, the good thing is that the interview provided firm support for my argument that the medical profession is a non-science-based education and training, where observations or collection of observations is considered scientific research or study, which is not in line with actual (experimental) scientific education, training, and practice.
A significant part of the interview is about COVID-19 and its vaccination issues. Dr. Aseem Malhotra firmly believes in and supports concepts and practices related to viruses and vaccination. In his view, “This (vaccines) stuff works.” “Some of the greatest achievements in medicine are conventional vaccines.” However, he considers the COVID-19 vaccines to be an exception.
Sadly, it is a very well-known fact that viruses do not exist, and vaccines have never been tested, or cannot be tested, against viruses or their illnesses as they are unavailable or non-existent. This is not an opinion but a scientific fact.
I will be careful in seeking and accepting opinions from medical professionals on the subjects discussed.