Category: Science

This morning, someone asked me about the separation and characterization of alleged viruses—or particles in general. I shared the following response, which I believe may also be useful to others. (The original query is attached below.)

Let me explain, as there seems to be some misunderstanding. SDS-PAGE is a separation technique, essentially a sorting tool. [Edited: In general, SDS-PAGE separation refers to the use of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) in combination with polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE)]. The application of a reference standard (or calibration) to an SDS-PAGE plate will indicate where the particles of interest are expected to migrate or be observed. Once the SDS-PAGE run is completed, we see a band at that location. However, from a professional and scientific perspective, the work is not finished at this point. The band we see may or may not correspond to the actual particles of interest—it could be slightly different, or even completely unrelated particles, but of the same size. This is because SDS-PAGE only separates particles based on their size; it does not identify them. For this reason, SDS-PAGE is classified as a separation technique, not a characterization technique. In this context, SDS-PAGE can be viewed as a more efficient alternative to ultracentrifugation, another separation technique that offers significantly lower resolution compared to SDS-PAGE.

(more…)

I would like to add some comments on the narrative (link). For convenience, the narrative is attached below.

Regarding the statement: “Immunization Practices (ACIP) has formed a new work group to review COVID-19 vaccines, focusing on safety, effectiveness, immunogenicity, and persistence of vaccine components such as mRNA, spike protein, and lipid nanoparticles.”

It must be stated plainly: the so-called components—mRNA, spike protein, lipid-related nanoparticles—are imaginary constructs manufactured by what passes as “medical science.” This is not legitimate science, but rather a pseudo-scientific framework built on assumptions rather than evidence. The entire narrative is tied to the concept of “viruses.” Yet, no virus has ever been scientifically demonstrated to exist as an actual, isolated, and purified entity in humans or animals. Without that proof, the rest collapses.

(more…)

Two of the most abused and fraudulent words of our time — especially in medicine.

In reality, so-called modern medicine has little to no connection with actual science, like physics or chemistry.

These labels are mostly worn by people who have never studied real science, yet parade around as “experts,” “scientists,” or “researchers.”

Beware.

What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)

Mr. Elon Musk recently sparked an important and timely debate by commenting on the overlap between research and engineering. While his observation may seem benign on the surface, it actually highlights a much deeper issue: the misuse—and often complete distortion—of the words science and research.

As Musk aptly noted: “This false nomenclature of ‘researcher’ and ‘engineer’, which is a thinly-masked way of describing a two-tier engineering system, is being deleted from @xAI today. There are only engineers. Researcher is a relic term from academia.”

Although Musk was addressing internal structures at xAI, the broader implications of his statement resonate across many fields. The casual use of the word research to describe development work not only confuses the public—it also erodes the credibility of real scientific research.

(more…)

(link)

He has an undergraduate degree (M.D.) in a non-science subject and a postgraduate degree (Ph.D.) in economics.

“He earned his Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) from the Stanford University School of Medicine in 1997 (but never had a residency/fellowship and never practiced medicine, link).

An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
Biology vs Science (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)

I started reading the article (link) but got bored after reading a few lines. I find it typical nonsensical narrative by medical professionals to sell fear to promote their “science” and products/services with convoluted and dodgy narratives.

For example, consider the first two words of the article “Antibiotic abuse.” Of course, the abuse of anything can be detrimental and must be avoided, but that does not mean it should be avoided all the time, including for its proper use. There is a definite need for antibiotics, and they have been used successfully for very long periods.

@ “According to the CDC, 2.8 million cases of antibiotic-resistant infections are diagnosed yearly, and 35,000 people die from them …” Citing the CDC claim is of limited authenticity of validity, as recently, the CDC has been under scrutiny for providing false or invalid reporting.

Next, are the narratives referring to “intrinsic resistance, acquired resistance, genetic change, DNA transfer.” These are all chemicals and chemistry/science terms, along with antibiotics, about which doctors have no knowledge or training. Therefore, it can be said with almost certainly that these are scientifically false or unproven narratives. It is like the hoopla about viruses and vaccines based on a genetic and DNA narrative, which has clearly been shown to be fraudulent.

Therefore, I suggest that medical professionals limit their practice and claims to the training and education they have received and refrain from engaging in science that has not been taught or learned – noting that a medical degree, such as M.D., is not a science degree.

An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
Unlawful Science Practices By Physicians (link)

This is a response to a query from a FB follower (see the FB post at the end of this document)

Thank you very much for your comment and query. It is hard to give a satisfactory reply, but I will try.

You stated, “And how a common person can distinguish between you and some random pseudoscientist who have zero experience?”

A straightforward answer is that a common person cannot distinguish between the two. There is a huge gap in education and knowledge between the two on the topic.

That is why people with education and expertise are awarded titles and accreditations to show the person (expert) is knowledgeable and trustworthy. This is how the system worked and should work.

When someone is awarded an M.D. degree, it (title) shows that the person is an expert and authority in the diagnosis (for existing illnesses), will correspondingly do a good job, and be caring and honest with the job and the client/patient.

(more…)

This article is about a year and a half old. I became aware of it today through an email from Dr. Meryl Nass (author of the email and the article). (link)

It is a very long article and is frustrating and boring; I could not continue reading it beyond a few pages. More importantly, it is filled with false information from a physician’s side. For example, stating that:

“I do not know if these viruses leaked accidentally or were deliberately released, but I am leaning toward the conclusion that both were deliberately released, …”

For heaven’s sake, this is 2025, and a majority, including many physicians, do not believe in the nonsense of viruses’ existence or their stories. However, this doctor does.

When will these doctors learn that no scientific evidence is available about viruses? Most likely, they will never, just like they have not learned that they are NOT science followers, experts, or scientists but are indoctrinated to believe in such claims. All of their claims and narratives in this regard are fake, false, and fraudulent.

Please, doctors, critically evaluate your education and training; you have not studied or practiced science, particularly scientific research, to any significant level. You are spreading false and fraudulent information about science. Please stop.

 Physicians And Their “Science” Are Getting Exposed link
Viruses/Vaccines: Disaster Manufactured by Medical Experts link
Selling Of Medicines In The Future – Suggestions link
Few Dare To Announce Unwelcome Truth link
People Losing Trust In Medical Professionals; Why? link
What is science, and who are scientists? link
 My training and expertise – people ask! link

The safety assessment of the vaccine concept/requirement reflects putting a cart in front of the horse. It is a gross misunderstanding of the subject (science) of medicine development and assessment.

As I described earlier (link), the safety assessment of any medicine comes after assessing its effectiveness. If a medication’s effectiveness or efficacy has not been shown, then there is no point in doing or seeking a safety assessment. The product would not come to the market.

Contrary to common belief, the efficacy of the vaccines has never been determined, i.e., the vaccines, including COVID-19, have never been tested against the viruses (as virus samples are unavailable); hence, vaccines and their vaccination are false and fraudulent practices (link). They need to be stopped immediately.

Suggesting their safety assessment defies logic but supports the vaccination, with potential harm to recipients.

Please consider seeking advice and help from people with knowledge and expertise in science/chemistry working with medicines (chemicals), including vaccines, avoiding further damaging people’s health due to ignorance, practicing false and fraudulent science, and unethical vaccinations (link).   

@ … they [physcians] know what you [the people, even the actual scientists] couldn’t possibly know.” That is the sales pitch doctors use as priests of the church of Medicine (“Science”) link

On the other hand, these priests have never studied or practiced science (or medicines/chemicals) that they sell. Their education and training are based on a non-science undergraduate degree to write prescriptions, similar to a clerical job.

Watch the video, recommended, but please focus only on the message.

Viruses/Vaccines: Disaster Manufactured by Medical Experts link
Selling Of Medicines In The Future – Suggestions link
Few Dare To Announce Unwelcome Truth link
People Losing Trust In Medical Professionals; Why? link
What is science, and who are scientists? link
 My training and expertise – people ask! link