Category: Uncategorized
Some information from the Health Canada (HC) website (link) with comments in italics for general awareness
- This information was provided by the drug’s manufacturer when this drug product was approved for sale in Canada. (implies HC may or may not have appropriately evaluated the information but approved the drug anyway) This leaflet was prepared by Pfizer Canada ULC, Last Revised June 13, 2022
- It is a summary of information about the drug and will not tell you everything about it. (implies the approval is granted without knowing the necessary information about the drug).
- Contact your doctor or pharmacist if you have any questions about the drug. (doctors or pharmacists do not know more except what is provided to them or common knowledge)
- PAXLOVID is used in adults to treat mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients who: have a positive result from a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral test. (There is no viral test available at present – this is false information).
- COVID-19 is caused by a virus called coronavirus. (There is no evidence of it as no virus has ever been found or isolated from any patient.)
- PAXLOVID contains two antiviral medicines copackaged together, nirmatrelvir and ritonavir. (These two separate drugs (potent chemicals) are provided in a blister pack rather than as currently available in separate bottles or packing. It is like packing two tablets of Advil and one tablet of Tylenol individually in a blister pack. It is not clear why it would be called or considered a new drug with a new name. These are old drugs, apparently with a new suggested indication).
- To be used no longer than 5 days in a row, usually 30 tablets per course (Thirty tablets course at US$530, i.e., US$17 a pill. It could be argued that it will be far cheaper if the same drugs are obtained from a chemical supplier. However, as a result, the efficacy and marketing “claims” of PAXLOVID will evaporate in smoke quickly (link).
- PAXLOVID stops the virus from multiplying. (A false claim, drugs have not been tested against this claim because no virus specimen is available at present to test).
- This can help your body to overcome the virus infection and may help you get better faster. (Infections are usually treated with anti-infectious medicine such as antibiotics, not with antivirals. Vaccines are considered to protect from viruses)
In short, PAXLOVID is not a new drug or product but a new package or dosage regimen of two old antiviral drugs. It is important to note that, as in the case of vaccine development for COVID-19 (link), the efficacy assessment of the product is not based on the actual scientific or experimental data using the virus (SARS-COV-2). Currently, no drug or vaccine can be tested against the virus or with patients, as the virus’s presence or isolation has not been established yet.
People do not realize that “clinical trials” are a form of (analytical) testing for medicine development and assessment, i.e., it is a fancy name for testing. But, scientifically, the current practice of clinical trials is as valid as the world-known fraudulent PCR testing and other related (Rapid test/antibody test, etc.). However, for a test to be valid, one requires a reference standard (in this case, the virus) that is unavailable. Hence, all the testing and results (cases, pandemics, waves) become irrelevant and fraudulent.
Similarly, conducting clinical trials requires appropriate treatment testing, including for vaccines against an illness, in this case, the virus or patient with illness/virus, and none is available. Hence, it is impossible to conduct relevant and scientifically valid clinical trials. Therefore, relevant clinical trials for COVID-19 have NEVER been done – it is not an opinion but a (scientific) fact.
It could be argued that the medical community and experts are aware of this weakness and fraud. So, the approach is to move to the next level to hide the fraud. In this case, clinical trials (which could not be conducted) are conducted with arbitrary and unrelated markers such as (RNA, PCR-positive/negative, antibody, variant, etc.) to fool people that science is being followed. It should be understood that science has never been followed in the COVID-19 case. Again, it is not an opinion but a scientific fact.
Everything is based on a biased “peer (buddy) review system,” not on an independent third party or scientific review. Hence, in the future, some system needs to implement for critical evaluation of testing and medicine/vaccine development and assessment. It is of utmost importance to note that testing and product development, including vaccines, do not fall in the area of practice of medicine. Unfortunately, it has been misplaced, and a change is urgently needed (1, 2)
Most do not realize that this, in reality, is the “modern” approach to defining and monitoring diseases. The medical experts need some serious soul searching on this aspect. Furthermore, they promote their approach is scientific or science-based. However, it is far from it! It is to be noted that medical institutions do not teach science or provide training in scientific research but in the practice of medicines, hence resulting in enormous confusion and misunderstanding about the subject and science.
Alec Zeck of The Way Forward hosts a live summit to dissect and debunk the monkey business surrounding both Monkeypox and the theory of pathogenic viruses at large. (video recording link)
or convenience, start times of the prensations are provided below if one likes to jump to a particular speaker.
(TOM COWAN @ 0:1:30), (SAM BAILEY @ 0:8:41), (MIKE STONE @ 0:10:45), (ANDY KAUFMAN @ 0:31:13), CHRISTINE MASSEY @ 0:49:13), (MARK BAILEY @ 0:58:21), (KEVIN CORBETT @ 1:01:17 ), (SAEED QURESHI @ 1:19:00), ( ERIC COPPOLINO @1:29:00), (AMANDHA VOLLMER @ 1:41:49), (Q&A @ 1:50:50)
Disinformation:
There is a virus-based pandemic (Link)
There is a virus (SARS-COV-2) (Link)
There is a test for the virus (Link)
The virus has been isolated (Link)
The RNA/virus has been sequenced (Link)
The spike protein is real and from the virus (Link).
The vaccines, including mRNA, have been tested against the virus (Link)
The vaccines are effective against the virus and protect people (Link)
There is evidence that face-mask and social distance provide protection (Link)
Lockdown can stop the spread of the virus (Link)
Physicians are trained in the science of isolation and identification of viruses (Link)
Science has been followed (Link)
Prove it wrong!
Just like SARS-COV-2, monkeypox does not have a test either. So, there is no way it can be detected, monitored, or “confirmed” by (PCR) testing. Please do not argue; it is not an opinion but a scientific fact. link
Researcher: ‘We Made a Big Mistake’ on COVID-19 Vaccine Article
The science clearly indicated a flawed and poor assessment of the mRNA vaccine and its dangers, which were described and predicted at the early stage of the vaccine’s development and introduction. See here. It was published on PSI as well (link)
The article makes an even bigger mistake: associating a protein (spike protein) with a nonexisting virus, i.e., rationalizing and justifying a nonexistent virus/illness and a “treatment” for it. ((link)).
It is controlled opposition, desperately trying to save the “science” and professions of viruses/medicines. However, I think they are dead now or will soon!
