Category: Vaccine

There is no scientific basis or justification for vaccination (link). I support Senator Rand Paul’s position on this matter and offer a scientific argument for it. Unfortunately, physicians are not in a position to counter this discussion, because the question is not medical (mistakenly assumed) but scientific in nature. Moreover, the defense of vaccination has become a matter of pride and ego within the medical community, rather than an objective evaluation of facts.

Institutions such as the CDC and FDA are now trapped in their own contradictions. Their predicament arises from years of misrepresenting medical practices as “science-based.” The central falsehood is the claim that the development and validation of vaccines are grounded in genuine science, and that physicians are scientists conducting scientific work. In reality, physicians receive little or no education, training, or experience in the true sciences—namely, chemistry, physics, and mathematics. Medicines, including vaccines, are chemical entities; therefore, their study and evaluation properly belong to chemistry, not medicine. What medicine presents in the name of science is, in fact, an imitation — a form of fake chemistry and fabricated experimentation.

(more…)

Thanks for asking my opinion on the topic of autism (link). By education, training, and expertise, I consider myself a scientist — more precisely, a chemist. Chemistry, among all the sciences, is the discipline that deals with the study of natural substances and their functions, including those within the human body. From this fundamental and scientific perspective, chemistry provides the most authentic and authoritative view of how the body functions — and how it malfunctions.

Understanding the human body through chemistry is not simple, but it is the most direct and logical approach to exploring health and disease. The body is an extraordinarily complex chemical machine, yet at its physical level, it operates through remarkably simple and predictable chemical principles. The major components of the body — carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, calcium, and trace elements like iron (in numerous combinations, called molecules) — behave and react just as they do outside the body, following the same laws of chemistry.

The Loss of Chemistry in Medicine

The first step toward understanding illness should always be the study of the body’s chemistry. Unfortunately, over the past five to six decades, the science of medicine has been gradually taken over by medical and pharmaceutical professionals who speak the language of chemistry but are not trained in it. They use chemical terminology, draw chemical formulas, and claim to conduct “scientific” research — yet very few of them have even the basic understanding of what chemistry actually represents.

(more…)

When asked, “What recent scientific discovery has fascinated you?“ my thoughts turn to the curious case of ivermectin and cancer — two seemingly unrelated entities now being linked in medical discussions (link).

As the article noted, “Ivermectin, widely known for treating parasitic infections…“ — and indeed, that is an established fact. Ivermectin was developed and prescribed as an antiparasitic drug. So how, suddenly, has it become associated with treating “cancer”? Could it be that what is being diagnosed as cancer might, in fact, be a misidentified parasitic or microbial illness?

Modern medicine has a long history of misdiagnosis — and even of creating diseases and treatments out of nothing. Virus-based illnesses provide a glaring example. There is no valid scientific evidence that viruses, as defined by medicine, actually exist; therefore, the so-called “viral diseases” cannot exist either. Yet, drugs and vaccines have been developed to treat these imaginary or mischaracterized conditions, from AIDS to COVID-19.

(more…)

This perspective may be both interesting and disturbing from the standpoint of a scientist and student of science. Dr. Hazan claims to have been involved in science for an extended period (link). Yet her training is in medicine, and her work centers on clinical practice and studies, which she equates with science. But how does conducting clinical trials or working with bacteria suddenly make one a scientific expert—or a scientist? At best, such activities fall under applied biology and observational practice. Unfortunately, many people, including physicians, wrongly assume this qualifies them to call themselves scientists.

The most glaring flaw in her claims is the belief in viruses and her assertion that  “[her lab] was the first lab to document the entire sequence of the virus.” Scientifically, this is impossible without first isolating the virus itself. To illustrate: if one wishes to prove that sugarcane contains sugar, the process begins with obtaining authentic sugarcane, extracting and isolating the sugar, and characterizing it using well-established chemical methods. Only then can one confirm the presence of sugar in sugarcane. Without authentic sugarcane, any claim of “finding sugar” in it is nonsense. Repeating such claims in scientific language, or publishing them in medical journals, does not make them science.

The harsh truth is that medical experts are not doing science, nor are they scientists. They fail to grasp such analogies because they have never studied science rigorously, nor learned its proper research techniques and methods. Their false claims stem directly from this lack of education. The same misplaced authority of medicine—fundamentally non-scientific training—brought us the so-called fake pandemic, built on the illusion of a virus that never existed to begin with.

Therefore, my request to medical professionals is simple: please refrain from making false claims about “science.” You do not have the credentials, and an M.D. degree has no basis in science. It is essentially a non-science, undergraduate-level qualification in prescribing medicines and following diagnostic procedures, without genuine research. Presenting this as “science” is misleading, untrue, and potentially dangerous. The general public should be aware of the false claims of science.

False Priests of Science (link)  
A Simple And Direct Question RFK Jr Needs To Ask – A Suggestion (link)

It is essential to note that the term “study,” as used here (quote) and throughout much of the medical literature, most often refers to an observational survey rather than a valid scientific study. The same applies to the term “research” in medicine—what is called “medical research” is frequently nothing more than a survey, sometimes with statistical analysis added, but still not scientific research in the true sense.

Actual scientific research requires several non-negotiable elements:

  • Defined and measurable inputs.
  • A controlled test object (humans, animals, or samples), placed in a controlled environment, independent of confounding factors.
  • Clearly defined outputs that can be measured using validated surrogate markers that can serve as substitutes for direct measurement.
  • Reproducibility, so that independent investigators can obtain the same results under the same conditions.

These are not special requirements unique to medicine—they are the basic principles of all scientific investigation.

Because medical education does not teach or train physicians in these principles, they often describe their practices as “science” even when they do not meet these standards. As a result, much of what passes for medical literature is, in fact, false science—opinion and observation presented as evidence.

It is also critical to note that the concept of “cancer” often falls into this same category of survey-based and observational science. Much like “viruses,” cancer diagnosis is mostly image-based, not grounded in rigorous, quantitative, analytical science. Diagnosis and treatment decisions are therefore largely subjective, not based on validated, reproducible measurements. Extreme caution should be exercised, as the potential for misdiagnosis and overtreatment is very high.

Therefore, most—if not all—of the medical literature must be regarded as scientifically suspect. If judged by the same standards applied in other fields, much of it would likely need to be retracted or withdrawn.

An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
The science behind COVID and vaccines! (link)
Chemistry, Not Medicine, Defines Science (link)
Questioning Medical Authority: Show Your Science Credentials (link)
Cancer or Misdiagnosis? An Uncomfortable Truth (link)
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)

“The greatest spreader of misinformation during the pandemic was the United States government.”
“And that is the weaponization of medical research itself.”
“And public-health officials were intellectually dishonest — they lied to the American people.”
Dr. Martin Makary (FDA Commissioner, link)

So why wasn’t this exposed earlier? Because it was buried inside the medical profession and shielded by the label “medical science” — a claim that protected the system from scrutiny. Criticism was silenced and independent checks were blocked. Meanwhile, today’s experts blame their predecessors while promoting the same “medical science.” The result: bogus diagnoses and fraudulent treatments will continue.

The solution is clear and urgent. Stop treating a corrupt “medical science” as an unquestionable truth. Let physicians use their judgment to guide patient care (writing prescriptions), rather than enforcing one-size-fits-all policies from centralized authorities. End all work masquerading as “medical science/research.” Treat medicines as chemical products that must be manufactured, tested, and regulated transparently by accountable chemical manufacturers — not hidden behind professional privilege or the false authority of so-called “pharmaceutical science.”


Do FDA and USP lie? Of course, all the time! (link)
An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
Claims of vaccines’ relevancy and efficacy – a big fat lie! (link)
The science behind COVID and vaccines! (link)
A Simple And Direct Question RFK Jr Needs To Ask – A Suggestion (link)
Quackery in White Coats (link)
Chemistry, Not Medicine, Defines Science (link)
Critical Review of Medical Authority and Scientific Legitimacy (link)
Questioning Medical Authority: Show Your Science Credentials (link)
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)

I read a recent Substack article by Dr. Alejandro Diaz (Immunologist and Global Health Expert) commenting on RFK Jr.’s effort to clean up the medical swamp—a remarkable endeavor in its beginnings. (link)

But I want to focus on one particular part of RFK Jr.’s statement. In an HHS press release, he said:

“We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted.”

Here lies the problem: “reviewed the science and listened to the experts.”

In reality, those so-called “experts” are mostly physicians and public health policymakers—individuals routinely portrayed as scientists but who, in fact, are not. The irony is that many of those celebrated as “science experts” lack any formal scientific credentials. This is perhaps the most critical, yet consistently overlooked, element of fraud within the healthcare profession—something even RFK Jr. and others fail to recognize.

Take physicians, for example. They hold an M.D.—a professional degree, not a scientific one. It does not provide rigorous training in foundational sciences, particularly chemistry—the very discipline central to medicine, including vaccines. The vaccine disaster did not stem from science itself, but from non-scientists masquerading as scientists, conducting experimental studies that made no sense. Every so-called study on viruses or viral illnesses proceeded without an actual virus sample or a demonstrable illness. Instead, conclusions leaned almost entirely on the PCR test—a scientifically invalid tool, irrelevant, inaccurate, and unreliable—for detecting both the “virus” and its supposed illness. This is, at best, profound scientific ignorance and, at worst, deliberate fraud carried out under the banner of expertise or science.

In this light, RFK Jr.’s efforts stand as a remarkable contribution toward exposing fraudulent practices at the CDC and within the medical profession. Still, while his work is valuable, it is not grounded in true scientific research or review, but rather in his investigative efforts, aided by sympathetic physicians.

If genuine science had guided health policy, there would never have been “virus” claims to begin with—because viruses, as categorized, have never been shown to exist. And if the virus does not exist, then vaccines against it are impossible by definition. The vaccine tragedy unfolded precisely because fake “science,” conducted and endorsed by physicians without real scientific credentials, replaced actual science.

And now comes the so-called “next step”:

“These statements reflect a dramatic shift in federal vaccine strategy—away from mRNA and toward platforms like whole-virus vaccines and protein-based technologies.”

This makes clear that they intend to remain entrenched in the vaccine business. But as I have already described, there is no virus—and therefore no need, nor even the possibility, of developing any treatment or vaccine. What we are witnessing is not science but medical fantasy.

The author of the article, an immunologist (a branch of biology—hardly a science in the true sense here), is simply working to sustain their virus-based nonsense and pseudo-scientific narrative. RFK Jr. must remain vigilant against such insidious attempts to promote false science and to divert attention from the urgent task of exposing and dismantling fraudulent medical and biological claims that have misled the world.

It is not just the concept that fails, but the logistics as well. To test a vaccine, one must separate an “infected” population from a “healthy” one. That requires a validated test. Yet no validated test exists, because there is no established reference standard for a virus. Therefore, properly designed clinical trials for vaccines are impossible to conduct. What continues instead is the endless beating of a dead horse: viruses, vaccines, and vaccination—vehicles designed only to extract enormous sums of money for fake science and fake scientists. The result is nothing more than a colossal waste of human and financial resources.

And then comes the hollow claim:

“I believe the President and his team at HHS have a momentous opportunity to truly reform these institutions and have a lasting impact on America’s public health.”

This suggests that no lessons have been learned from the catastrophic COVID-19 episode. Continuing down this path—with viruses and vaccines—only ensures that history will repeat itself, likely on an even larger scale.

It is time to stop. There is no such thing as “medical science.” There is no virus, and there never was. Therefore, there is no need for vaccines, nor could there ever be an effective one. To proceed with this charade is not progress but the continuation of fraudulent science—an enterprise that harms people, wastes resources, and corrupts the very meaning of science itself.

Quackery in White Coats (link)
Chemistry, Not Medicine, Defines Science (link)
Critical Review of Medical Authority and Scientific Legitimacy (link)
Questioning Medical Authority: Show Your Science Credentials (link)

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. In general, I agree with your comment and conclusion—except for the last sentence: “A formal education in a topic doesn’t guarantee you are right.” (link)

I often hear this view, and frankly, it troubles me. Yes, many scientists wrongly treat their education as a seal of correctness. However, a more significant issue is that non-scientists often forcefully impose their views with absolute certainty. This is the real tragedy: those who have studied and worked in genuine science are placed on the same level as those who have not. People without scientific training—including physicians—often assume the authority of science without having been scientists themselves.

(more…)

“A re-analysis of the Pfizer and Moderna trials, published in Vaccine by eminent, independent scientists—including BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi—revealed that from the very beginning, the rate of harm in these trials was alarming. According to their findings, you were two to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the COVID-19 vaccine.” Paraphrased from Dr. Malhotra’s recent presentation (link).

Impressive! After four years of vaccine rollout—and with significant harms now being reported—Dr. Aseem Malhotra, once a loud and loyal supporter of vaccines (including the COVID-19 vaccine), has suddenly reinvented himself as a leading activist against them. Remember, this is the same man who proudly proclaimed: “Some of the greatest achievements in medicine are traditional vaccines, no doubt.” (link)

(more…)

Cures or treatments are only possible for real illnesses—not for imaginary or fabricated ones like “viruses” and their supposed diseases. For decades, billions of dollars have been poured into developing treatments for viral infections, yet nothing has been eradicated; instead, infections appear more frequently, not just in isolated cases but as global “pandemics.” The irony is that no one has ever produced an actual sample of the virus they claim to be working so hard to cure. Has the world ever seen greater con-artistry—run under the banner of science by people with no true expertise in science?

The same holds true for cancer. Billions have been spent on cancer research by the very same “science” experts who push the virus narrative. If what they label as “cancer” is most likely a microbial infection, then, of course, there can be no cure under their framework. Instead, they push lethal chemicals and destructive procedures, generating enormous profits for practitioners and corporations. Why would they ever admit it is a microbial infection treatable with inexpensive medicines? That would not only collapse their business model but also expose the fraud of modern science—another textbook case of modern-day con-artistry.

It is time to stop funding this fraudulent version of “medical science.” No more research grants for it, no more unearned titles of “science experts” or “scientists” for physicians pretending to practice science. Then—and only then—will we begin to see illnesses truly disappear from this earth.

Cancer or Misdiagnosis? An Uncomfortable Truth (link)