Category: Vaccine

Post Views: 0
sick student blowing his nose into a tissue.

From Facebook (link)

You asked an interesting and valid question often asked. However, answering (science-based) requires a lengthy response (maybe a book) because it is a complex topic and a highly messed up case. Let me try as a short comment.

From a scientific perspective, if one likes to deal with sickness, one must first define what a sickness is. Or inversely, what is healthy or what a healthy person is. I posted this question on FB some time ago. I got some responses, not concrete, but illusive or philosophical. So, if the objective is unclear or undefined, one cannot work with it in science. Therefore, at least at present, there is no science in healthcare or medical areas.

People are working with assumptions, narratives or theories, which are more like guesses. The two most popular ones (in allopathic) are Germ and Terrain theories. Germ theory is based on the assumption that gems, like bacteria, fungi, parasites, etc., make people ill. Terrain theory describes that the environment and/or food one consumes causes the illness. However, no (scientific) evidence supports this claim other than a view that “healthy food and a healthy environment produce healthy people.”

I think Germ’s theory is more reasonable and logical because there is evidence that germs cause illnesses and can be treated with medicines. Hearing this, people shout back at me with rage, saying:

(1) So, then, you believe in viruses. Show us where the viruses are. Such a response from “experts” is based on ignorance. I am a strong advocate of the fact that viruses do not exist. Germs’ theory is not relevant to viruses because germs exist but not viruses. Mixing germs and viruses is the biggest fallacy of these so-called science experts (“scientists”).

(2) no evidence exists that germs show one-to-one cause and effect. The problem with this argument is that it is almost impossible to observe such an interaction, at least scientifically. The reason is that germs and the body’s biological system have extreme (natural/physiological) variability and are further exacerbated by the environment. Hence, it is impossible to conduct control and accurate studies as such. Let the scientists (not medical experts) work with it; they can figure this out. However, scientists have been removed from the area, so confusion and falsehood prevails.

In short, people are not sick, and if they are (often normal wear and tear), then in general, they can be addressed by watching their nutrition imbalances and/or fixing microbial abnormalities. Certainly, a recent culprit is the use of long-term medicines (potent chemicals), which, by any standard, can be the cause of sickness.

Enjoy your life with the blessings of the Almighty. We have been blessed with much better food and environment, an envy for the great majority of the world population. Do not get scared; do not eat this or that. These are just to sell their “products.”  I wish I had more time and space to describe underlying science/chemistry aspects and how much nonsense these “experts” are promoting – maybe some other time.

Post Views: 11

I commented on a post (link**) you may find helpful.

Thanks again, Steve Bashir, for your comment. I wish more people had the same approach and thinking as yours – not a follower or cult member, but a listener and open-minded to learn and understand the topic. It will not only help me explain things but will encourage my science/chemistry fellows to come forward to explain how much science has been distorted and messed up in medical and pharmaceutical areas. I will happily help anyone interested in learning about the relevant science aspects. I have significant relevant experience in the field. Continue (here)

Post Views: 7

Article: “Even When It Came to Children, German Government Ignored Own Scientists to Impose Strict COVID Vaccine, Mask Mandates” (link).

I scanned through the article because of the word “scientists” in the title. However, there is no science or scientists in the article, except the views of some who claim to be scientists (I believe self-declared) and their narratives (surveys/observations).

I would like to emphasize that someone with a Ph.D. in a subject does not qualify as a scientist. The person may be considered an expert in that subject. For example, someone with a Ph.D. in biology or medicine may be regarded as an expert in biology or medicine practice (prescription write-ups) – not science. Similarly, adding the word “science” in a subject, e.g., political science, computer science, health science, etc., would not make these subjects science subjects or people having expertise scientists. It is incorrect, and such labeling should be avoided. It causes enormous problems (e.g., false claims of illnesses and their treatments) and gives a very bad name to actual science, its work, and scientists.

In a true sense, science subjects include physics, chemistry, and/or mathematics, working at fundamental/basic levels with extensive and exhaustive hands-on experience in laboratories with physically existing substances.

Fake and false science produced fake and false outputs, such as viruses, tests/testing, pandemics, and vaccines. Actual science has played no role in such narratives/discoveries. In fact, science/chemistry accurately described their nonexistence and irrelevancies.

Please use caution when reading the words science and scientists, particularly in modern medicine and its literature. They are all fake and false—there are no science or scientists.

  • Doctors’ Science Requires Audit and Accountability (link)
  • What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
Post Views: 34

If someone claims to be a doctor and is caught practicing medicine without proper academic credentials and required registration, authorities deal with such a person promptly and harshly. Most likely, the person would face heavy fines and go to jail for extended periods for the fraud.

However, nothing happens when a doctor claims to be a scientist and practices scientific research without relevant academic credentials or experience/expertise. Instead, doctors get large sums of money/funding for their “scientific research” from authorities/agencies, inventing fake illnesses, viruses, etc., and irrelevant treatments (vaccines, pharmaceuticals, etc.). Why is it so? This anomaly (fake and false science) needs to be addressed. An audit and accountability in this respect is urgently required and should be done by actual science/chemistry experts or scientists, as medicines and their interactions are chemicals and chemistry-based, respectively.

  • An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
  • Doctors’ Role In Illness And Treatment Development And Invention Needs To Stop (link)
  • What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
  • Science-Based Medicines (link).
Post Views: 9

In a major ruling, the Supreme Court sharply reduced the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretation. (link.)

The court overruled its landmark 1984 decision, which gave rise to the doctrine known as the Chevron doctrine. Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the Agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable. In a 35-page ruling by Chief Justice John Roberts, the justices rejected that doctrine, calling it “fundamentally misguided.” Continue here

Post Views: 12

First, people should understand the difference between medicines and medicinal products. It’s critical, and many/most, including doctors, may not know it.

A medicine is mostly a pure chemical (powder or liquid). On the other hand, the medicinal product is a package, e.g., tablets (pills), capsules, suspensions, syrups, ointments, etc. These “packages” are to deliver medications to the body conveniently. It is just like juice or milk in cartons. The actual or needed substance is the juice or milk, and a carton or package delivers/transfers its content, then goes to waste.

Many (non-active or non-medicinal) components are mixed and/or compressed with actual medicines to develop these packages (e.g., tablets). Once someone takes the tablet (package) orally, the actual drug/medicine comes out of it and gets absorbed, and the rest is a waste and is supposed to come out of the body unaltered and without causing any harm.

However, if one takes the drug/medicines, say acetaminophen for Tylenol as a powder in an equivalent amount and mix with some water and drinks it, they will have their dose of medicine. They may act faster than their packaged versions, as they do not get to dissolve in the body as they are pre-dissolved.

Very important—medicines/drugs obtained from chemical suppliers (chemists) will be genuine and have much better assurance of quality and purity as they are certified against authentic (reference) standards.

On the other hand, drug products are only available from pharmaceutical manufacturing or pharmacies (a twisted version of chemical manufacturing), without any testing against (reference) standards, only based on a claim that they are approved by FDA/CDC/USP (the pharmaceutical equivalent of CDC) and other regulatory agencies, but NOT tested against any authentic (scientific) standard—not many know this. 

A chemical manufacturer should also manufacture drug products. Chemical manufacturing is purely mixing chemicals/molecules (often very simple molecules using simple processes). In that case, the products will be of higher quality and far cheaper than their “pharmaceutical” version—and with the science behind them.

In short, a direct from (chemical/medicine) manufacturers to consumers/patients may be practiced. It would be a superior approach, eliminating the involvement of others, especially those having no training and expertise in science/chemistry.  

Post Views: 7

People use the word “science” to describe viruses/virology, assuming science was done. This is what virologists and medical experts like people believe and assume, that science (may be shaky, wacky, etc.) is being done. However, please be clear that that “science” is not there. They are fooling/deceiving people. I repeat – there was/is NO science; virologists and medical experts (doctors) do not study or practice science. Virology and medical “science” must be thrown out as a deception and fraud. (link)