Category: Virus
Article: “Even When It Came to Children, German Government Ignored Own Scientists to Impose Strict COVID Vaccine, Mask Mandates” (link).
I scanned through the article because of the word “scientists” in the title. However, there is no science or scientists in the article, except the views of some who claim to be scientists (I believe self-declared) and their narratives (surveys/observations).
I would like to emphasize that someone with a Ph.D. in a subject does not qualify as a scientist. The person may be considered an expert in that subject. For example, someone with a Ph.D. in biology or medicine may be regarded as an expert in biology or medicine practice (prescription write-ups) – not science. Similarly, adding the word “science” in a subject, e.g., political science, computer science, health science, etc., would not make these subjects science subjects or people having expertise scientists. It is incorrect, and such labeling should be avoided. It causes enormous problems (e.g., false claims of illnesses and their treatments) and gives a very bad name to actual science, its work, and scientists.
In a true sense, science subjects include physics, chemistry, and/or mathematics, working at fundamental/basic levels with extensive and exhaustive hands-on experience in laboratories with physically existing substances.
Fake and false science produced fake and false outputs, such as viruses, tests/testing, pandemics, and vaccines. Actual science has played no role in such narratives/discoveries. In fact, science/chemistry accurately described their nonexistence and irrelevancies.
Please use caution when reading the words science and scientists, particularly in modern medicine and its literature. They are all fake and false—there are no science or scientists.
If someone claims to be a doctor and is caught practicing medicine without proper academic credentials and required registration, authorities deal with such a person promptly and harshly. Most likely, the person would face heavy fines and go to jail for extended periods for the fraud.
However, nothing happens when a doctor claims to be a scientist and practices scientific research without relevant academic credentials or experience/expertise. Instead, doctors get large sums of money/funding for their “scientific research” from authorities/agencies, inventing fake illnesses, viruses, etc., and irrelevant treatments (vaccines, pharmaceuticals, etc.). Why is it so? This anomaly (fake and false science) needs to be addressed. An audit and accountability in this respect is urgently required and should be done by actual science/chemistry experts or scientists, as medicines and their interactions are chemicals and chemistry-based, respectively.
In a major ruling, the Supreme Court sharply reduced the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretation. (link.)
The court overruled its landmark 1984 decision, which gave rise to the doctrine known as the Chevron doctrine. Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the Agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable. In a 35-page ruling by Chief Justice John Roberts, the justices rejected that doctrine, calling it “fundamentally misguided.” Continue here
People use the word “science” to describe viruses/virology, assuming science was done. This is what virologists and medical experts like people believe and assume, that science (may be shaky, wacky, etc.) is being done. However, please be clear that that “science” is not there. They are fooling/deceiving people. I repeat – there was/is NO science; virologists and medical experts (doctors) do not study or practice science. Virology and medical “science” must be thrown out as a deception and fraud. (link)
Someone wrote, “Viruses have always been imaginary. Always.” It is a correct claim.
The question is why this claim has not been accepted; even recently, some very vocal experts, including doctors and biologists, have forcefully argued against the existence of viruses.
Doctors and biologists dominate both groups and claim to be science experts, followers, or scientists. Interestingly, both groups accuse each other of being followers of pseudoscience.
The issue is that doctors/experts in neither group are science experts or scientists. The subjects (medicine and biology) are not (experimental or empirical) science subjects. The only science subjects in this regard are physics, chemistry, and/or mathematics. Medicine (primarily chemicals) and biology (isolation and characterization of biological components, which are also mainly chemicals) have to be dealt with by the science subject (chemistry).
Science can only deal with physically existing things available in pure form to work, hence absent from medical and biology areas. Medical and biological “sciences” are based on narratives and speculation, often dealing with imaginary things like viruses, vaccines, etc.
Therefore, viruses are imaginary. Doctors and medical experts need to stop claiming that they are science followers and scientists and that “viruses” exist. Such claims are simply false and fraudulent.
PS. An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link).
The article (link) that was brought to my attention describes the views of two prominent doctors on the virus and the COVID-19 aspects, notably their isolation and characterization.
In short, there is nothing new here. It is just repeating false claims about the virus and its isolation. It is clear that the authors do not understand the underlying science, thus making numerous invalid and false claims. For example:
Continue here