The article (link) that was brought to my attention describes the views of two prominent doctors on the virus and the COVID-19 aspects, notably their isolation and characterization.
In short, there is nothing new here. It is just repeating false claims about the virus and its isolation. It is clear that the authors do not understand the underlying science, thus making numerous invalid and false claims. For example:
Continue here
Different doctors suggest different chemicals (cleverly named as medicines/treatments), such as mRNA vaccine, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, etc., to address the issue (symptoms/infections) of COVID-19. The claims of the effectiveness of these chemicals are based on studies (implying “scientific or experimental studies”) often published in “scientific” journals. However, from critical and logical considerations, these studies and claims are not scientific – as no virus or infection is available for testing or developing treatments. Testing a virus or its infection requires a valid test that is unavailable and cannot be developed until a physical virus sample is available [1]. Hence, all claims of testing, viruses, or treatments are scientifically fake and false.
(more…)
Someone asked how to address the issues with medicines and related medical (doctors’) sciences.
I suggest moving the chemicals-based (allopathic) medicines away from doctors and pharmacists, including all testing (diagnostic or otherwise). They are doing chemists’ work without relevant training and education, making disastrous blunders and ruining people’s health. The subject has to be managed by appropriately educated and experienced scientists/chemists. All development, manufacturing, testing, approval, and marketing of medicines/chemicals must be guided by chemistry experts.
Doctors should provide the service they are trained for, i.e., they should provide standardized prescriptions by observing symptoms and clinical test results. They should not claim to be science experts or scientists or be involved in scientific (experimental) research.
I commented on an article. I think the comment would also be helpful to the visitors of this blog.
@ “They are science, as best as I know it.” How? (link)
The question is which science is being followed here – presumably epidemiology. Epidemiology is “the branch of medicine which deals with the incidence, distribution, and possible control of diseases and other factors relating to health.” (link)
It means it is part of medicine. Sorry to say it, but science is not part of the training or learning of medicines. For example, an M.D. (Doctor of Medicine) is a standard non-science undergraduate degree. Therefore, epidemiology should not be considered a science subject or part of it. (link).
In general, epidemiology depends on the interpretation and/or outcome of diagnosis/testing from the medical area. For example, in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, the whole story revolves around PCR testing, which by any standard is a fake and fraudulent test, i.e., it has no link to the virus (SARS-COV-2), illness (COVID-19) or mRNA (vaccine development). Hence, all interpretations, including those by epidemiology, will be presumptions or opinion-based, not scientific or factual.
The actual science of medicine is chemistry, particularly analytical chemistry (link). Please consider this.
A medical degree such as an M.D. (Doctor of Medicine) is a standard undergraduate non-science degree without any training in experimental/laboratory science or research in medicines (chemicals). The science and research aspect must be conducted under the guidance of experts in chemical science (chemistry) to be valid. From a scientific perspective, the virus, virology, pandemic, (PCR) tests, and vaccines (all are chemical-based) can easily and quickly be established as fake and fraudulent.
It is now undisputed that no virus has been isolated; hence, it does not exist. So, why is this fact not accepted, and why do people/experts (including doctors) believe viruses exist?
The reason is that “virus isolation” is primarily described in medical, virology, and (micro)biology literature. Considering the lack of knowledge and training on the topic (isolation) and, in general, science/chemistry, where the topic belongs, medical/biological experts use the words “isolation” and “isolate” interchangeably (link).
Sadly, it is an example of ignorance and incompetence in the subject/science. Isolation is a separating (extracting or purifying) process/step of something from a mixture, while “isolate” means a substance, mostly a crude extract/mixture/gunk. The word “isolate” concerning the virus may be explained by analogy: fermentation broth (isolate) and alcohol (virus) in the broth. Importantly, they both have to exist independently.
The experts in the virus camp claim that the virus exists and has been isolated. They do not realize that samples available from vendors, such as BEI, or used in studies are isolates, not viruses (link). The vendor sells isolates, NOT viruses, without any claim or assurance it (isolate/broth) contains the virus. In consumer language, it is a tricky and fraudulent claim for a product. Therefore, whoever claims that viruses are part of the broth (or culture) uses tricky language to cheat or lie. Use caution in trusting them or their “science.”
In short, the claims and arguments about the virus’s isolation and existence reflect scientific ignorance and incompetence, i.e., physical or actual science/chemistry. Therefore, all claims about virus existence, related pandemic, and their treatment developments (such as vaccines) are fictional, not factual, and certainly not based on science (link).
Opinions on this aspect (science) from the experts (doctors, virologists, and microbiologists) who do not study the actual science are irrelevant. There is an inherent interest in protecting their (false) science and published “scientific research,” which must soon be retracted as false and fraudulent.
Hence, choose your experts wisely for valid scientific advice! (link).
Medical experts consider practicing medicine and virology/(micro)biology as the science to resolve illnesses. Sadly, they are incorrect as they caused more health issues and created false diseases and their treatments (vaccines are the latest disastrous example).
The actual science of medicine is chemistry, as medicines are chemicals. Therefore, these experts must study chemistry thoroughly or seek help from experts in chemistry. One should start with analytical chemistry (science for testing), as all diagnoses and treatments begin with testing.
The virus and its treatment (vaccine) are based on PCR tests, which are fake and fraudulent. Hence, they created false illnesses and treatments (vaccines).
Link
