Category: Virus

Some say science is what follows or adheres to the Scientific Method; otherwise, it is pseudoscience. It is like saying cooking is what follows the cooking method. Is it not a circular definition or argument?

In reality, science comes first. The “Scientific Method” comes after; it is a derivative of or dependent on science.

(Actual) science means studying chemistry, physics, and mathematics in significant detail. One studies science and then develops its methods (for understanding and extending scientific concepts) using scientific principles, which become true scientific methods. Therefore, one must first study science (chemistry, physics, and mathematics) to develop and deal with scientific methods.

On the other hand, people who do not study science but like to promote themselves as scientists/researchers promote a made-up definition of science based on the so-called “Scientific Method,” bypassing the requirements or needs of science or its study – clever! In this case, there is no need to know or understand science but to keep lecturing others about science. It’s a typical scam/con trick to consider oneself a scientist/researcher (i.e., without studying science). This is how many non-science experts became scientists/researchers. The issue is more visible in medicine and biology (such as virology, immunology, microbiology, etc).

Be vigilant about this con artistry or fake science promotion. If you like to know about actual science, look for people who studied and specialized in science subjects – chemistry, physics, and mathematics. More here.

There have been intense discussions on the “Scientific Method” approach concerning viruses and virology (extended into Germ Theory) on social media such as FaceBook and Telegram. Continue here.

It is a lie that medical and pharmaceutical experts follow science. They do not study, get training, or practice science. The actual science is chemistry, as most medicines are chemicals and behave in the body following the principles of chemistry (the science), which these professionals hardly study or apply. There is no such thing as medical or pharmaceutical science. These are false and fraudulent versions of chemistry.

The assertions of the virus’ (SARS-COV-2) existence, its illness (COVID-19), and the development of vaccines (mRNA) have been false and fraudulent and can easily be shown so by applying basic scientific (chemical) principles.

In the future, avoid anyone who promotes (chemical) based medicines without having extensive knowledge and training in chemistry/science, such as isolation, testing, and test validation. Their claims almost certainly will be baseless and false.

For further details, see here, here, here, and more.

A recent article published in Epoch Times, titled “Growing Number Of GOP Candidates Pledge To Disavow COVID-19 Vaccine And Big Pharma” reported here (link), makes suggestions for stopping poorly developed vaccine injections, stating.

“It is pretty clear that the numbers and the data behind the vaccine were not accurate and as a result we are looking at what is probably one of the greatest blunders in modern medical history,” said Mr. Lowe.

“We started enforcing injections on people without having accurate information and it ended up costing lives.”

“This whole episode has been a dark blotch on our country and there needs to be change and that starts with our elected representatives,” added Mr. Lowe.

John Perez, who is running in the GOP primary for the House District 133 seat in Texas, cited the outsized influence pharmaceutical companies have had on the political system.

“I pledge right here and right now that I have not and will not accept donations or in-kind contributions from Big Pharma PACs or Big Pharma companies,” Mr. Perez wrote in a Dec 17 post on X, …”

It may be more appropriate, beneficial, and expeditious if the issue is addressed differently.

It is true that the (pharmaceutical) industry manufactured the vaccines and benefitted immensely. However, the COVID-19 disaster is not their making, in my view. People and political leadership seem to be missing this critical point.

The medical profession, in particular, physicians, consider themselves scientists – falsely and fraudulently, directly or through Government agencies, caused this disaster. They are still promoting false viruses, variant narratives, and fictional illnesses. They conduct false and fraudulent laboratory “research” because they are not trained to be scientists or to do such research. It is all fake science (they conduct and promote).

Therefore, as a first step to addressing the virus/vaccine issue, they should be disqualified from their claim as scientists and laboratory researchers. Their so-called laboratory activity/research must be stopped immediately. The industry will be unable to produce or have the incentive to make fake science-based medicines. Society will benefit healthwise and save resources by avoiding spending on fake and unnecessary medications and treatments.

Further information may be found here (link, link, link, link)

This article is a response to an intense discussion on FB (Link, link, link, link). Considering its length, which may not be suitable for FB, I am posting it as a blog article. My blog visitors, who may not follow FB, would also benefit from the post here.

Wow! Very interesting comments here on this thread and others.

To me, the most interesting ones are the comments concerning my (unacceptable) behavior and (poor) writing and communication skills. It is laughable; many clearly understand what I write about the science and the virus/virology. So, what is the issue? Do you expect that I should have writing skills like competing against a Harry Potter Novel writer or some linguistic expert? Sorry, I write simply using direct words, often science and scientific demands, not in sweet or double-meaning wordings or narratives. Continue here