Recently, in one of his podcasts, Dr. Cowan (an M.D.) invited doctors, virologists, etc, to submit their evidence supporting claims that the virus has been isolated (i.e., it exists), which, in his view, has not been isolated (i.e., it does not exist), considering the “Scientific Method” approach (link).
This is not new, i.e., asking for a debate, but it seems more formalized and perhaps with better marketing effort. Continue here.
People will not believe it, but it is true and a fact that universities hardly teach about medicines and science for a Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) degree.
More astonishing is that academia promotes doctors as (medicine/chemical) science experts or “scientists” without teaching them about the science of medicine (chemistry). No wonder the mRNA vaccine resulted in such a disastrous blunder and an extreme tragedy. It is a tragedy of ignorance and incompetence.
A doctor’s role as a science expert or researcher must be stopped immediately, as it is a fraud. Doctors should only practice what they are trained to do, i.e., hearing/watching the symptoms, seeking relevant test results, and then writing up matching prescriptions from memory or through Google.
Medical professionals are among the least educated and knowledgeable about science. Prove me wrong!
The question is: When medicines are approved to be safe and effective, why can’t they be sold like any other safe and effective product? Why are they placed behind the counter like tobacco products? Why does one have to pay a service fee to bring the medicines from behind the counter to the front of the counter? Why cannot they be sold through vending machines, online, or chemical stores (medicines being chemicals) and reviewed by users and independent, knowledgeable third parties?
They cannot be because everything associated with authorities’ approved (allopathic) medicines will go bankrupt in no time, as no substantiated and independent scientific evidence is available to support their claims of their quality (by extension, safety and efficacy). Authentication (valid scientific testing) is not part of the medicines development and manufacturing system.
I have been saying this for the past 20 years about pharmaceutical products such as tablets and capsules. mRNA vaccines are the current and the best-documented example of this fraud. Medicines are sold on an as-is basis – with priesthood-type claims, i.e., science has been done, viruses exist, and vaccines work. When the fact is – that no science has been done, the virus does not exist, and vaccines cannot work. Science, its training and practice, is not part of the medical and pharmaceutical professions and practice. The public and “experts” have been living with lies for the past some decades.
No wonder developers and manufacturers require strong legal protection/immunity from expected damages (“adverse effects”) as medicines/chemical products are developed primarily under the guidance and supervision of (medical and pharmaceutical) experts who lack the needed expertise in science/chemistry.
Auditing by independent third parties, such as those having analytical chemistry-based expertise, considering medicines are chemicals, is urgently needed (more).
The views often described about science and scientists are usually more philosophical in nature. Such views, though valid and worthy of discussion, confuses the situation and diminish efforts to get out of the fraudulent so-called medical and virological sciences.
At this stage, a direct approach for science and scientists is needed to get out of the current tragic situation of viruses and pandemics and the perpetual or unending use of potent chemicals in the name of medicines.
In this respect, a working definition is that science is the study and training in chemistry, physics, and/or mathematics, and scientists are those who are involved in these subjects and have many years of hands-on working experience.
Furthermore, science and scientists work with substances that physically exist and are available and measurable directly or indirectly using validated scientific techniques. Anyone claiming to be working (e.g., physicians, virologists, etc.) with presumed or imaginary substances, like a virus, virus’s RNA, and proteins, or their illnesses, must be ignored from the science or scientists category.
People often object to my views/articles, stating that I only reference my blog articles (i.e., self-referencing) and do not cite articles from peer-reviewed journals concerning the existence of the virus and its related topics. The lack of articles on the subject in peer-reviewed journals is of concern about the credibility and authenticity of my work.
On the other hand, they argue that numerous scientific articles from various sources are available and published in peer-reviewed journals showing, that the virus exists and has been isolated. Hence, their claims for the virus’s existence are credible.
People here are confusing consensus with the true physical (experimental) science. The view is that many studies about the virus have been published in the literature, so the virus must be there and isolated. That is consensus. However, I practice and describe experimental physical science (actual science – chemistry), which requires an actual sample of a substance to work with, in this case, the virus. As no actual virus sample is available, I cannot do scientific studies, publish, or write like others, i.e., publish fake science studies (for example, see here).
This practice of fake science in the medical/virology areas is common and alarming. It cannot be addressed internally as they all believe fake science is real/actual science, causing huge damage to science and the public.
An external audit can only address the issue, which will quickly show that medical experts have been working with fake science and have never been with actual science. If not all, most of the publications will have to be withdrawn as having no merit or value. Most people who are not knowledgeable in science do not realize the disastrous fakeness of science in the medical and pharmaceutical areas.
I hope this helps clear up the concern.
