Author: Dr. Saeed Qureshi, Ph.D.

@ “Let’s make it clear: America deserves better leadership than this [RFK Jr.] (link, link)

What is the alternative to it? Keeping the medical experts (aka physicians) as science followers or scientists. The irony is that medical experts lie because they do not study science; practically every claim about science they make is fake and false. They do not realize this falsehood because they lack an understanding of science.

For example:

  • They do not provide valid scientific evidence of the virus’s isolation (existence), its RNA, or spike protein.
  • They use fake and fraudulent (PCR) tests, which have no ability or scientific validity to detect or monitor anything related to the virus.
  • They are promoting vaccines that have not been tested against the virus or its illness/infection.  
  • As a physician, he should focus on the patient’s care and vaccine safety and efficacy, not to explain the vaccine industry. It seems an apparent conflict of interest.

One can easily and quickly conclude that if someone external to their (medical) cult comes with authority to question their claims, their fake and false claims will be exposed and ruin their fraudulent science and vaccine practices. That is the worry, not the health or care of people. (link).

From Center of Inquiry’ (cfi) Post (link)

ICYMI: a can’t-miss moment from last night’s Skeptical Inquirer Presents livestream—Dr. Paul Offit breaks down why Robert F. Kennedy, Jr might be the absolute worst choice for Secretary of Health and Human Services.

⚠️ Why is this so dangerous?

Imagine putting someone who thinks vaccines are “deadlier than the diseases they prevent” in charge of public health. From promoting conspiracy theories to undermining life-saving science, RFK Jr. is a ticking time bomb for Americans’ health and safety.

It’s officially go-time. His confirmation hearing is this Wednesday, January 29th. We need your voice:

👉 Tell your senators to oppose his nomination with our action alert: https://ow.ly/4XEk50UMXpa

👉 Get the facts and tools to take action at Quackwatch’s RFK Jr. Watch: https://ow.ly/mS2M50UMXpf

👉 Watch Dr. Offit’s full Q&A: https://ow.ly/mgEc50UMXuw

Let’s make it clear: America deserves better leadership than this.

#VaccinesWork #RFKJr

For example, see here: (link)

RFK Jr. says he likes to see appropriate safety studies and data. What is so wrong with it? That the vaccists (vaccine supporters) are so angry and upset.

I think deep down; they are very nervous that their false claims of the past 4/5 decades about the false virus and fraudulent vaccines are to be busted. They realize they will be proven wrong and fraudulent on every aspect of viruses and vaccines. This is an undeniable fact. They can shout as much as they like but are destined for shame.

Facts:

No isolated, purified, and fully characterized virus sample is available anywhere.

All studies claimed to be done with viruses are scientifically false and fraudulent because none used actual viruses.

Vaccines have never been tested against the virus and/or its illness.

There is no valid scientific evidence available that mRNA vaccines contain claimed mRNA.

And more

Vaccines Against Viruses – How? (link)
COVID and science divergence (link)
Biology, Virology, Immunology, Medical Science, Etc. Cannot Be Considered Science Subjects (link)
Few Dare To Announce Unwelcome Truth (link)
mRNA Vaccine Is Not mRNA But Gunk – A Forensic Analysis (link)

Once approved and declared safe and effective by the pharma, doctors, and authorities like the FDA and CDC, the medicines must be sold directly to consumers/patients, placing them on shelves beside other safe and effective products, such as food. There would not be any need for immunity for anyone, which would be unnecessary.

Government agencies or medical authorities/associations must not mandate the use and pricing of medicines. Consumers/patients must have the choice to choose per their own needs and preferences and be allowed to tell their opinions, openly and freely, about drugs, good or bad, like any other consumer product.

If this is not practiced, then it simply means that the promoters of medicines lack confidence in the products and lie about their claims of safety, efficacy, and quality.

Physicians should not be allowed to advertise or participate in the advertisement of medicines as such a practice creates a potential for conflict of interest. Moreover, it provides a false assurance that physicians are knowledgeable about medicines (chemicals) and their science/chemistry. It is an incorrect assumption and a false representation of their education, training, and expertise.

I am sure if such an approach is followed, not only will many or most drugs disappear from the market, including vaccines, but so will many diseases, including cancer, viral infections/pandemics, obesity, diabetes, and heart problems, to name a few.

Do FDA and USP lie? Of course, all the time! link
Few Dare To Announce Unwelcome Truth link.
Physicians as Scientists: A Hideous Claim link

Two non-science experts (Dr. Robert Malone and Mr. Larry Ellison) argue for and against using AI for cancer research/treatment. Based on actual scientific knowledge and expertise, I shared my view on the topic two days ago, stating that AI-based cancer research does not make sense. The reason is that no valid or empirical laboratory test is available to detect cancer. Hence, it is not currently possible to use AI to detect and/or analyze cancer data and to work on its treatment, whether vaccines or anything else.

Please use caution when scientific research is guided by those with limited or no scientific knowledge or expertise. Otherwise, one would end up with a repeat of COVID-19 and its vaccination disaster.

Further details may be found in the following articles.

Video “The Alex Jones Show” with Dr. Robert Malone (link)
AI-Based Cancer Treatments: It Does Not Make Sense (link) – Mr. Larry Ellison’s view
Dr. Marty Makary’s YouTube Video (link)
Physicians as Scientists: A Hideous Claim (link)
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
The science behind COVID and vaccines! (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)
COVID-19: Open letter to physicians, pharmacists, and laboratory managers (link)

While surfing the internet, I came across this piece describing AI-based treatment for cancer by Oracle CEO Larry Ellison (link). For convenience, I reproduce it below:

“Thank you Mr President. One of the most exciting things we’re working on using the tools that Sam and MSA are providing is our cancer vaccine. It’s very interesting early diagnosis.

All of our cancers, cancer tumors (have) little fragments of those tumors float around in your blood so you can do early cancer detection. If you can do early cancer detection with a blood test using AI to look at the blood test, you can find the cancers that are actually seriously threatening the person.

So we can again cancer diagnose using AI. (AI) has the promise of just being a simple blood test. Then beyond that, once we gene sequence that cancer tumor you can then vaccinate the person, design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer. And you can make that vaccine, the mRNA vaccine, you can make that robotically again using AI in about 48 hours.

So imagine early cancer detection, the development of a cancer vaccine for your particular cancer aimed at you and have that vaccine available in 48 hours.

This is the promise of AI and the promise of the future.” – Oracle CEO Larry Ellison”

Scientifically, it does not make sense. For example:

(more…)

A few months ago, I wrote, “ An M.D. degree is a typical non-science undergraduate degree, and holders of such cannot be considered science experts or scientists. Their (“science”) institutions have to be shut down. There is no other option.”

“Seek an audit of the claims of the so-called medical and pharmaceutical sciences; it is the issue (fraud), while viruses, virology, and vaccines are secondary to it.” link

I believe the audit that is needed has started (link). Thank you, President Trump.

“Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison recently discussed the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare during a meeting at the White House, which also featured SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. According to Ellison, AI could revolutionize cancer detection, treatment, and vaccine development, offering groundbreaking capabilities.” (link)

To see what happened (relatively recently) when someone with no science/testing background developed a test from a drop of blood. Authorities, please pay attention.

COVID-19 (pandemic) testing vs Theranos’ blood testing – similarity of underlying false/fraudulent claims (link)
COVID-19: Open letter to physicians, pharmacists, and laboratory managers (link).

link

Myabe, it is for this reason?

“Viruses, vaccines, virology, medical science, health science, pharmaceutical science, etc., and related institutions, including the CDC, FDA, Health Canada, etc., have practically died. For all practical purposes, they are now zombies and are there to scare people to protect their own interests and enterprises.” (link).

“A number of Donald Trump supporters and vaccine skeptics have criticized the president after he talked up multibillion-dollar artificial intelligence infrastructure project, which, it was suggested, could help develop vaccines for cancer.” (link).

“Donald Trump Backing mRNA Vaccine Project Gets Backlash.”

And it should be a cause of concern because vaccines, in particular mRNA, are simply false products. For example, stating:

@ “ An mRNA vaccine uses a molecule called messenger RNA (mRNA) to instruct cells in the body to produce a protein.”

This is an assumption made and promoted by medical science, which is fake and false science to start with. No scientific evidence shows that mRNA vaccine contains the expected mRNA or produces protein (or spike protein). It is an assumption or theory based on drawing sketches on paper or computer screens (link).

AI projects may be worthwhile in medicine to provide diagnosis alternatives to humans (physicians) based, but not for developing new treatments (certainly not vaccines) for ill-defined diseases such as viral infections (link, link) or cancer (link). More (actual) scientific research is needed to properly define and assess such diseases before their treatment is considered or developed (link).