Two non-science experts (Dr. Robert Malone and Mr. Larry Ellison) argue for and against using AI for cancer research/treatment. Based on actual scientific knowledge and expertise, I shared my view on the topic two days ago, stating that AI-based cancer research does not make sense. The reason is that no valid or empirical laboratory test is available to detect cancer. Hence, it is not currently possible to use AI to detect and/or analyze cancer data and to work on its treatment, whether vaccines or anything else.

Please use caution when scientific research is guided by those with limited or no scientific knowledge or expertise. Otherwise, one would end up with a repeat of COVID-19 and its vaccination disaster.

Further details may be found in the following articles.

Video “The Alex Jones Show” with Dr. Robert Malone (link)
AI-Based Cancer Treatments: It Does Not Make Sense (link) – Mr. Larry Ellison’s view
Dr. Marty Makary’s YouTube Video (link)
Physicians as Scientists: A Hideous Claim (link)
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
The science behind COVID and vaccines! (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)
COVID-19: Open letter to physicians, pharmacists, and laboratory managers (link)

While surfing the internet, I came across this piece describing AI-based treatment for cancer by Oracle CEO Larry Ellison (link). For convenience, I reproduce it below:

“Thank you Mr President. One of the most exciting things we’re working on using the tools that Sam and MSA are providing is our cancer vaccine. It’s very interesting early diagnosis.

All of our cancers, cancer tumors (have) little fragments of those tumors float around in your blood so you can do early cancer detection. If you can do early cancer detection with a blood test using AI to look at the blood test, you can find the cancers that are actually seriously threatening the person.

So we can again cancer diagnose using AI. (AI) has the promise of just being a simple blood test. Then beyond that, once we gene sequence that cancer tumor you can then vaccinate the person, design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer. And you can make that vaccine, the mRNA vaccine, you can make that robotically again using AI in about 48 hours.

So imagine early cancer detection, the development of a cancer vaccine for your particular cancer aimed at you and have that vaccine available in 48 hours.

This is the promise of AI and the promise of the future.” – Oracle CEO Larry Ellison”

Scientifically, it does not make sense. For example:

(more…)

A few months ago, I wrote, “ An M.D. degree is a typical non-science undergraduate degree, and holders of such cannot be considered science experts or scientists. Their (“science”) institutions have to be shut down. There is no other option.”

“Seek an audit of the claims of the so-called medical and pharmaceutical sciences; it is the issue (fraud), while viruses, virology, and vaccines are secondary to it.” link

I believe the audit that is needed has started (link). Thank you, President Trump.

Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison recently discussed the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare during a meeting at the White House, which also featured SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. According to Ellison, AI could revolutionize cancer detection, treatment, and vaccine development, offering groundbreaking capabilities.” (link)

To see what happened (relatively recently) when someone with no science/testing background developed a test from a drop of blood. Authorities, please pay attention.

COVID-19 (pandemic) testing vs Theranos’ blood testing – similarity of underlying false/fraudulent claims (link)
COVID-19: Open letter to physicians, pharmacists, and laboratory managers (link).

link

Myabe, it is for this reason?

“Viruses, vaccines, virology, medical science, health science, pharmaceutical science, etc., and related institutions, including the CDC, FDA, Health Canada, etc., have practically died. For all practical purposes, they are now zombies and are there to scare people to protect their own interests and enterprises.” (link).

“A number of Donald Trump supporters and vaccine skeptics have criticized the president after he talked up multibillion-dollar artificial intelligence infrastructure project, which, it was suggested, could help develop vaccines for cancer.” (link).

Donald Trump Backing mRNA Vaccine Project Gets Backlash.”

And it should be a cause of concern because vaccines, in particular mRNA, are simply false products. For example, stating:

@ “ An mRNA vaccine uses a molecule called messenger RNA (mRNA) to instruct cells in the body to produce a protein.”

This is an assumption made and promoted by medical science, which is fake and false science to start with. No scientific evidence shows that mRNA vaccine contains the expected mRNA or produces protein (or spike protein). It is an assumption or theory based on drawing sketches on paper or computer screens (link).

AI projects may be worthwhile in medicine to provide diagnosis alternatives to humans (physicians) based, but not for developing new treatments (certainly not vaccines) for ill-defined diseases such as viral infections (link, link) or cancer (link). More (actual) scientific research is needed to properly define and assess such diseases before their treatment is considered or developed (link).

Few dare to announce unwelcome truth – Edwin Percy Whipple.

I know I will not make many friends on this, and perhaps will make many very angry, but it must be explained that,

Medical experts (physicians), in reality, are trained as clerks.

It is almost impossible for most to recognize that modern-day medical experts, particularly physicians, are trained to perform a simple clerical job, like a server. They are educated and trained in writing prescriptions (orders) based on supposedly standard and well-defined treatments/medicines as suggested by their senior doctors or their professional associations.

There is hardly any need or dependence on higher thinking or education, particularly in science. Physcains’ claim of a higher level of intellect and education is based on memorizing science/chemistry terminologies (vocabulary) and techniques without understanding, like a ritualistic practice. There is a lack of any valid education or training in science/chemistry or scientific research in this profession.

Physcians’ claim that they follow science or are scientists is simply false. There is no evidence that they conducted valid scientific studies, but observational or survey-based assessments are often labeled as clinical assessments or trials, commonly with questionable statistical analyses.

It is commonly believed that pharma or government authorities such as the FDA and CDC are to bear the blame for deficiencies in illness identification and/or faulty treatments. However, the public, even experts, do not realize that these are invented, developed, tested, manufactured, and marketed under the supervision and guidance of medical experts, mostly physicians. No drug or treatment can be developed and sold without the explicit approval of physicians (so-called science followers or scientists) working in the organizations.

There is an urgent need to assign or reassign physicians’ roles per their academic credentials and training to avoid further damage to public health and welfare. Further, to bring valid science to study illnesses and their treatments.

Auditing medical professionals as science-based is necessary, starting with inquiring about which science subjects physicians study, when, and from where.

What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)
Physicians as Scientists: A Hideous Claim (link)

Agreed!

If a product (vaccine or any other drug) is considered safe and effective, it must be placed on shelves with other safe and effective products, like food items. If the product does not show its safety and effectiveness, then the consumer/patient must be able to return the product with their money back. The manufacturers must be held accountable by the court for the failure, NOT by the FDA/CDC, because they are part of approving the (faulty) drug/vaccines.

No immunity, as it is a loophole to sell substandard and irrelevant products at a very high price in the name of false (science) claims? It is to be noted that there are no (actual) science or scientific studies conducted in developing and approving modern-day drugs, which is why industry requires immunity.

Science And Scientists (link).

Science and scientists – perhaps the most used or, more like, abused two words during the past five years are often associated with people (experts) having high intellect and extraordinarily learned knowledge and expertise to understand health and medicines – interchangeable for doctors or physicians.

However, the reality is that these scientists, experts, or doctors/physicians never study and/or trained in science. Their knowledge and expertise are based on a typical non-science undergraduate degree like an M.D.

Remember this when listening to “science” and “scientists” in medical or health areas.

What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)
Physicians as Scientists: A Hideous Claim (link)