Category: Pharmacetical

Disaster If WHO Gets Total Medical Control – Dr. Meryl Nass (link).

So, what is the request/suggestion here?

To keep “control” with physicians and their national institutions, like the CDC, FDA, National Medical Associations, etc. Is it not this control by the physicians and their organizations that caused the fake pandemic, as well as the development of fraudulent medications, including vaccines?

I believe the public and experts are missing the point. It is not a ” control ” issue but considering and promoting physicians as “scientists.” This is the problem that caused the fake pandemic.

Physicians do not learn or are trained to be scientists. They are not taught to identify new illnesses, their causes, and their treatment. However, this is what they did and are doing that caused the harm – the pandemic and associated public policy disasters.

In the interview, Dr. Nass acknowledges the COVID-19 illness, which, in reality, does not exist scientifically. There is no illness of this name/nature because it is assumed to be caused by a virus called SARS-COV-2, which is now generally recognized not to exist. It is an illusion from an actual scientific perspective.

Therefore, to avoid potential future (fake) pandemics, physicians’ role must be limited to only what they study and are trained for, i.e., to prescribe medications for recognized illnesses with recommended treatments. Their classification as “scientists” needs to be reconsidered or discontinued (link).

Years ago, I suggested a simple convolution approach using MS Excel Spreadsheet to predict blood/plasma drug levels from drug dissolution results. Several successful applications of such an approach have been published. A simple yet revolutionary approach! The model spreadsheet may be obtained from here.

Details of the approach are described in the publication (Saeed Qureshi (author), In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation (IVIVC) and Determining Drug Concentrations in Blood from Dissolution Testing – A Simple and Practical Approach, The Open Drug Delivery Journal, 2010, 4: 38-47 (link).

Obtain a copy of Helpful Notes (link) for pharmaceutical drug dissolution testing with several examples of using this (convolution) technique, along with articles describing the testing, its issues, and suggested solutions.

People do not realize that it is not only COVID-19/Ivermectin, as an example of so-called clinical trials, but most, if not all, will be shown to be invalid. As I have explained several times, the reason is that clinical trials are a specific type of analytical (chemistry) test. Unfortunately, these tests/trials are done and promoted fraudulently as valid and scientific. Proper analytical tests require precise and quantifiable outcomes (endpoints) using VALIDATED analytical tests/methods.

In the case of current practices of clinical trials, there is no such thing – neither an objective and qualifiable endpoint (but mostly subjective symptoms or arbitrary markers) nor validated tests (but non-validated and irrelevant tests such as PCR, drug dissolution). Hence, a valid clinical or scientific trial cannot be conducted, particularly under the guidance of medical experts and related regulatory authorities who lack the necessary training and understanding of the subject/testing.

Do not forget the disastrous failure of the clinical trials and the vaccine development for COVID-19. The catastrophic outcome of the vaccine was accurately predicted based on the understanding of flawed PCR tests and the analytical or scientific aspects of clinical trials (link, link, link, and much more at Bioanalyticx.com).

Further information may be found here: Helpful Notes and the Book by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing, among other specialties.

People should keep in mind that physicians, including specialists like cardiologists, virologists, immunologists, oncologists, etc., are not trained for chemicals (deceptively called medicines) and their development and testing.

This lack of training and practice/”research” in chemical science (chemistry) caused the fake science practices of virology/immunology. It resulted in development of harmful “medicines,” so-called vaccines, and other related claims.

If it had been seen from the scientific aspects of chemicals/substances, it would have become instantaneously apparent that there is no virus, valid test, and safe and effective vaccines. There is a lesson to be learned here.

If the chemical aspect is considered, the assessment of the diseases (diagnosis) in general would become much easier, and developed treatments would be much simpler and more efficient.

Similarly, practices requiring social distancing, face masks, and lockdowns would become unnecessary, as they would easily be shown as unscientific. Most likely, there will not be pandemics in the future, certainly not viral ones.

I suggest medical professionals and experts seek help from knowledgeable chemists/scientists in developing and assessing medicines (generally non-physiological chemicals).

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.

Have you ever wondered why most medicines are kept behind the counters, obtainable through prescriptions only, and sold by pharmacists only, while the products are approved by authorities such as the FDA, Health Canada, and others as safe and effective?

The reality is that they have never been shown appropriately safe and effective but are only presumed to be by the authorities. In general, physicians and pharmacists do not know this either. They also assume that the authorities have (scientifically) tested and validated the claims of safety and effectiveness. They do not. No one does! The debacle of COVID-19 and vaccines has provided glaring proof, which I  have been trying to tell for at least 20 years. Continue here

Is This Vax Really Adulterated per Kirsch/Bridle/McKernan? (link)

Below is my view on the topic.

@ “Is This Vax Really Adulterated … “

There is no way to find out because no pure or unadulterated one is available. Why?

Rituals are often followed in medical/pharmaceutical practice (“science”), and things get declared based on a sellable story with some scientific-sounding jargon.

It is like a gain of function (GOF) research. Scientifically and logically, the first step is to show the baseline/reference, i.e., the original version (“virus”), followed by the tampered one, a variant or modified (link).

However, the “original virus” has never been shown, but the tampered ones have been described. Why? It promotes and maintains the non-existent “virus” story as if it is something real.

Similarly, some have started discussing adulterated (tampered) vaccines while no vaccine (unadulterated/reference) is available. It is just junk in the vial, without any control or defined content to make the story believable that an actual vaccine exists.

Note that I wrote earlier, even before the vaccine development, that it is impossible to develop a vaccine, and indeed, there is no vaccine (unadulterated or adulterated), just false claims. (link).

Obtain a copy of Helpful Notes to learn about the misunderstanding of the science behind the viruses/vaccines/pharmaceuticals (link).

About the view that vaccine(s) may include some type of DNA targeting, I responded as follows:

Being a chemist/scientist all my life, and mainly in the pharmaceutical area, when I read about pharmaceuticals, including viruses and vaccines, it is evident to me that medical experts clearly describe chemistry in a glorified and catchy language. However, most of their claims do not make sense and are often false and fraudulent.

You mentioned “DNA targeting.” yes, indeed, this is possible, but is it happening? I seriously doubt it. If medical/pharmaceutical experts cannot isolate a virus, RNA, or spike protein, they cannot (not capable) of working with DNA targeting, as assumed. So, it is fancy language to impress that something (high-level “science”) is happening.

On the other hand, as I described (here and here), it looks like they are injecting partial or unpurified cell culture (as a “vaccine”), assuming it is mRNA and is causing the problems (adverse effects), including deaths.

The only and easiest/quickest way to find out is to get an audit done by experts with experience in isolation/purification to establish if the mRNA/vaccine is pure as described or junk.

However, in the current (regulatory) system, an audit is done by experts who have no or limited experience in isolation and purification and have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, so they will provide fancy stories and seek more funding for “research” to prepare for next “pandemic” and “vaccine.”

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.

I responded to someone on the topic of virus shedding. I thought my response would be helpful for the visitors here, as well.

Both sides of the physicians (for and against the virus/shedding) use the literature in support of their argument. However, the literature is incorrect because it is based on the assumption of the existence of the virus.

A few things discussed about the virus/virology are spike protein, RNA, DNA, mRNA, the virus (a composite of protein and RNA), and vaccines (a composite of assumed mRNA and other ingredients). The described literature is based on these items, which are chemicals in nature.

It should be evident that people should consult and follow chemists to learn about these things. Why do people follow physicians and seek advice about the chemicals from them when it is known that they are not knowledgeable in chemistry/science to the extent needed to explain these things?

I am a chemist who has worked in the area for over 35+ years. Seeing the chemical descriptions and narratives in the medical/pharmaceutical literature tells me everything written is nonsense and garbage.

Why – because when the claims are made about the compounds/chemicals (noted above), the simple fact is that they must be available in a physical form, isolated, purified, and fully characterized. Period – no question asked!

However, the literature does not provide any evidence of the existence of the noted compounds or their composites (showing pictures of SOUP (GUNK) is not scientific evidence of their existence). Hence, nothing is real—neither the virus, vaccine, testing nor their shedding. Enjoy your God-given life to its fullest without fear. Do not distance away from your loved ones and those who care about you.

This is the best I can say. I hope this will be helpful.

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.