Category: Testing

From FB (link, ref. @Jason Pickels)

I agree with your undecidedness or perhaps confusion. The reason is that most narratives in the medical area (“science”) are based on biology, which is mistakenly considered science. In this regard, most claims are opinions or, at best, observations (social surveys), not scientific. Hence, people, in general, are suffering from “illnesses” because of misdiagnoses and mistreatments.

Vaccines and vaccinations are false treatments because they are treatments for viruses (a biological opinion or guess) that have not been shown to exist. So, treatment is not treating anything but ends up resulting in poor health because of side effects, in some cases extremely bad.

On the other hand, believing and promoting that germs are “friendly” and do not or cannot cause harm is also a biological opinion or guess, and not treating it as such is also a misdiagnosis leading to bad health and possibly death.

There is hope that these misdiagnoses could be addressed using actual science/chemistry, as the body is based on chemical molecules and reactions, physiology).

So, please do not be carried away with opinions and guesses; focus on actual science/chemistry and seek help from those who know actual science/chemistry. I do not pretend that learning and understanding science/chemistry will be easy. It is a challenging subject but doable with time and effort.

I have been writing about this topic for some time now. You can get help from my writing. If you have questions or require clarifications, I will happily address them as time allows.

Best of luck.

https://bioanalyticx.com/what-is-science-and-who-are-scientists/

Why Do People Get Sick – A View! (Part 2)

https://bioanalyticx.com/my-training-and-expertise-people-ask/

https://bioanalyticx.com/biology-virology-immunology-medical-science-etc-cannot-be-considered-science-subjects/

@ “Before widespread vaccines, disease killed nearly half of U.S. children under 5” (link)

The article, by a physician, is full of misinformation and false claims about science. Unfortunately, doctors do not study or are trained in science, so they make incorrect claims. For example;

@ “When a vaccine is developed, it is not immediately available to patients. It goes through many years of rigorous development before it is determined safe for human trials.”

Human or clinical trials are not science. It is a gross misunderstanding.

@ “Anyone can publish their opinion that is not based on science or expertise.”

This is true for physicians who do not study science and make false claims. Sorry! Doctors, please consider correcting your information and knowledge.


Clinical trials – misrepresentation of science (link)
COVID-19 Clinical trials: be watchful (link)
Understanding clinical trials and their outcomes – fake science at its best! (link).
Doctors Lie (link)  
Biology, Virology, Immunology, Medical Science, Etc. Cannot Be Considered Science Subjects (link)
The FDA Committee’s Review of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine: Unscientific, False and Deceitful (link).

“An Extraordinary Step’: White House Mulls ‘Preemptive’ Pardon for Fauci” (link)

One thing is clear: fraudulent activities have occurred, as has been pointed out repeatedly through my blog (link) and the Book “Slaying the Virus and Vaccine Dragon” (link). For example, (1) False and fraudulent story of the existence of the COVID-19 virus (and others); (2) Use and promotion of fraudulent testing (PCR, Antigen, etc.); (3) Development of vaccines and declaring their efficacy without testing them against the virus, infection and or its patients.

The other most critical aspect is that physicians and medical experts, internal and external to governments worldwide, claim to be science experts (scientists) when their training and education are based only on a non-science undergraduate degree.

https://bioanalyticx.com/an-m-d-degree-is-not-a-science-degree/
https://bioanalyticx.com/dr-marty-makarys-youtube-video/
https://bioanalyticx.com/52-top-leading-eminent-scientists-how-and-why/

medicine, healthcare and pharmacy concept – different pills and capsules of drugs

A drug dissolution test is a test used to establish the quality of a pharmaceutical product, such as a tablet or capsule. This test is conducted because the drug (often called active ingredient) needs to be released from the product for its absorption into the blood to elicit its therapeutic effect.

The test is conducted in place of a clinical test/study called bioavailability or bioequivalence, a pharmacology/pharmacokinetic study type. The test is the backbone of quality assessment of all tablet and capsule products. It is a requirement of worldwide authorities, including the FDA, Health Canada, etc., and pharmacopeias such as USP, BP, EP, etc.

(more…)

I commented on a post (link**) you may find helpful.

Thanks again, Steve Bashir, for your comment. I wish more people had the same approach and thinking as yours – not a follower or cult member, but a listener and open-minded to learn and understand the topic. It will not only help me explain things but will encourage my science/chemistry fellows to come forward to explain how much science has been distorted and messed up in medical and pharmaceutical areas. I will happily help anyone interested in learning about the relevant science aspects. I have significant relevant experience in the field. Continue (here)

Article: “Even When It Came to Children, German Government Ignored Own Scientists to Impose Strict COVID Vaccine, Mask Mandates” (link).

I scanned through the article because of the word “scientists” in the title. However, there is no science or scientists in the article, except the views of some who claim to be scientists (I believe self-declared) and their narratives (surveys/observations).

I would like to emphasize that someone with a Ph.D. in a subject does not qualify as a scientist. The person may be considered an expert in that subject. For example, someone with a Ph.D. in biology or medicine may be regarded as an expert in biology or medicine practice (prescription write-ups) – not science. Similarly, adding the word “science” in a subject, e.g., political science, computer science, health science, etc., would not make these subjects science subjects or people having expertise scientists. It is incorrect, and such labeling should be avoided. It causes enormous problems (e.g., false claims of illnesses and their treatments) and gives a very bad name to actual science, its work, and scientists.

In a true sense, science subjects include physics, chemistry, and/or mathematics, working at fundamental/basic levels with extensive and exhaustive hands-on experience in laboratories with physically existing substances.

Fake and false science produced fake and false outputs, such as viruses, tests/testing, pandemics, and vaccines. Actual science has played no role in such narratives/discoveries. In fact, science/chemistry accurately described their nonexistence and irrelevancies.

Please use caution when reading the words science and scientists, particularly in modern medicine and its literature. They are all fake and false—there are no science or scientists.

  • Doctors’ Science Requires Audit and Accountability (link)
  • What is science, and who are scientists? (link)

In a major ruling, the Supreme Court sharply reduced the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretation. (link.)

The court overruled its landmark 1984 decision, which gave rise to the doctrine known as the Chevron doctrine. Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the Agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable. In a 35-page ruling by Chief Justice John Roberts, the justices rejected that doctrine, calling it “fundamentally misguided.” Continue here

First, people should understand the difference between medicines and medicinal products. It’s critical, and many/most, including doctors, may not know it.

A medicine is mostly a pure chemical (powder or liquid). On the other hand, the medicinal product is a package, e.g., tablets (pills), capsules, suspensions, syrups, ointments, etc. These “packages” are to deliver medications to the body conveniently. It is just like juice or milk in cartons. The actual or needed substance is the juice or milk, and a carton or package delivers/transfers its content, then goes to waste.

Many (non-active or non-medicinal) components are mixed and/or compressed with actual medicines to develop these packages (e.g., tablets). Once someone takes the tablet (package) orally, the actual drug/medicine comes out of it and gets absorbed, and the rest is a waste and is supposed to come out of the body unaltered and without causing any harm.

However, if one takes the drug/medicines, say acetaminophen for Tylenol as a powder in an equivalent amount and mix with some water and drinks it, they will have their dose of medicine. They may act faster than their packaged versions, as they do not get to dissolve in the body as they are pre-dissolved.

Very important—medicines/drugs obtained from chemical suppliers (chemists) will be genuine and have much better assurance of quality and purity as they are certified against authentic (reference) standards.

On the other hand, drug products are only available from pharmaceutical manufacturing or pharmacies (a twisted version of chemical manufacturing), without any testing against (reference) standards, only based on a claim that they are approved by FDA/CDC/USP (the pharmaceutical equivalent of CDC) and other regulatory agencies, but NOT tested against any authentic (scientific) standard—not many know this. 

A chemical manufacturer should also manufacture drug products. Chemical manufacturing is purely mixing chemicals/molecules (often very simple molecules using simple processes). In that case, the products will be of higher quality and far cheaper than their “pharmaceutical” version—and with the science behind them.

In short, a direct from (chemical/medicine) manufacturers to consumers/patients may be practiced. It would be a superior approach, eliminating the involvement of others, especially those having no training and expertise in science/chemistry.