Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison recently discussed the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare during a meeting at the White House, which also featured SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. According to Ellison, AI could revolutionize cancer detection, treatment, and vaccine development, offering groundbreaking capabilities.” (link)

To see what happened (relatively recently) when someone with no science/testing background developed a test from a drop of blood. Authorities, please pay attention.

COVID-19 (pandemic) testing vs Theranos’ blood testing – similarity of underlying false/fraudulent claims (link)
COVID-19: Open letter to physicians, pharmacists, and laboratory managers (link).

link

Myabe, it is for this reason?

“Viruses, vaccines, virology, medical science, health science, pharmaceutical science, etc., and related institutions, including the CDC, FDA, Health Canada, etc., have practically died. For all practical purposes, they are now zombies and are there to scare people to protect their own interests and enterprises.” (link).

“A number of Donald Trump supporters and vaccine skeptics have criticized the president after he talked up multibillion-dollar artificial intelligence infrastructure project, which, it was suggested, could help develop vaccines for cancer.” (link).

Donald Trump Backing mRNA Vaccine Project Gets Backlash.”

And it should be a cause of concern because vaccines, in particular mRNA, are simply false products. For example, stating:

@ “ An mRNA vaccine uses a molecule called messenger RNA (mRNA) to instruct cells in the body to produce a protein.”

This is an assumption made and promoted by medical science, which is fake and false science to start with. No scientific evidence shows that mRNA vaccine contains the expected mRNA or produces protein (or spike protein). It is an assumption or theory based on drawing sketches on paper or computer screens (link).

AI projects may be worthwhile in medicine to provide diagnosis alternatives to humans (physicians) based, but not for developing new treatments (certainly not vaccines) for ill-defined diseases such as viral infections (link, link) or cancer (link). More (actual) scientific research is needed to properly define and assess such diseases before their treatment is considered or developed (link).

Few dare to announce unwelcome truth – Edwin Percy Whipple.

I know I will not make many friends on this, and perhaps will make many very angry, but it must be explained that,

Medical experts (physicians), in reality, are trained as clerks.

It is almost impossible for most to recognize that modern-day medical experts, particularly physicians, are trained to perform a simple clerical job, like a server. They are educated and trained in writing prescriptions (orders) based on supposedly standard and well-defined treatments/medicines as suggested by their senior doctors or their professional associations.

There is hardly any need or dependence on higher thinking or education, particularly in science. Physcains’ claim of a higher level of intellect and education is based on memorizing science/chemistry terminologies (vocabulary) and techniques without understanding, like a ritualistic practice. There is a lack of any valid education or training in science/chemistry or scientific research in this profession.

Physcians’ claim that they follow science or are scientists is simply false. There is no evidence that they conducted valid scientific studies, but observational or survey-based assessments are often labeled as clinical assessments or trials, commonly with questionable statistical analyses.

It is commonly believed that pharma or government authorities such as the FDA and CDC are to bear the blame for deficiencies in illness identification and/or faulty treatments. However, the public, even experts, do not realize that these are invented, developed, tested, manufactured, and marketed under the supervision and guidance of medical experts, mostly physicians. No drug or treatment can be developed and sold without the explicit approval of physicians (so-called science followers or scientists) working in the organizations.

There is an urgent need to assign or reassign physicians’ roles per their academic credentials and training to avoid further damage to public health and welfare. Further, to bring valid science to study illnesses and their treatments.

Auditing medical professionals as science-based is necessary, starting with inquiring about which science subjects physicians study, when, and from where.

What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)
Physicians as Scientists: A Hideous Claim (link)

Agreed!

If a product (vaccine or any other drug) is considered safe and effective, it must be placed on shelves with other safe and effective products, like food items. If the product does not show its safety and effectiveness, then the consumer/patient must be able to return the product with their money back. The manufacturers must be held accountable by the court for the failure, NOT by the FDA/CDC, because they are part of approving the (faulty) drug/vaccines.

No immunity, as it is a loophole to sell substandard and irrelevant products at a very high price in the name of false (science) claims? It is to be noted that there are no (actual) science or scientific studies conducted in developing and approving modern-day drugs, which is why industry requires immunity.

Science And Scientists (link).

(link)

Is an axe coming? I believe an axe (sledgehammer?) should be coming.

The agency is based on doctors’ science, which is fake and false, as doctors do not study or are not trained in science and scientific research. The agency has lost its credibility as a science-based organization during the (fake) pandemic based on a fake (scientifically invalid and fraudulent) test and developing or accepting a vaccine use without testing them against the virus or its illness or infection.

People Losing Trust In Medical Professionals; Why? (link).

People trusted the medical profession and professionals (physicians) and believed in them as science followers or scientists. Considering their claims as scientific, people accepted that viruses and pandemics exist, that vaccines (developed by physicians) are needed, and that they work to treat illnesses (pandemic) like COVID-19.

Unfortunately, they (physicians) lied. They never studied or worked with science. All the claims, like virus isolation or existence, (PCR) testing, pandemic, vaccines, lab-leak theories, gain of function research, etc., have no scientific validity and are fictional narratives.

So, the issues should be addressed accordingly.

Vaccines Against Viruses – How? (link)
Physicians as Scientists: A Hideous Claim: (link)
Misinformation By Physicians – A Need For An Audit (link).
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)

“At Last, a Mainstream Media Article that Mentions a Direct Link Between Covid Vaccines and Cancer (link).”

I read this article with great interest, written by Dr. Angus Dalgleish (MBBS), a senior physician specializing in oncology, immunology, and HIV-related virology (link).  

Note that his expertise is based on two things: medical credentials (a non-science undergraduate degree, MBBS) and HIV research, i.e., working with a virus, like many others, including COVID-19, which has not shown to exist.

It clearly shows that Dr. Dalgleish would have limited or no expertise in science. Therefore, although the observations described may be correct and relevant, such an article should not merit a scientific assessment.

From a scientific perspective, it reflects opinions and guesses, like the existence of the COVID-19 virus, its testing, development, and claim of safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines. It is critical to note that no scientific evidence shows that mRNA vaccines even contain expected mRNA (link). It is an opinion or a guess. So, it is unclear whether mRNA/vaccines cause cancer.

In this regard, one should also note that cancer itself is a vague or undefined illness – based on pictures (biopsies), like the identification of viruses based on pictures of cultures. Clear, defined, or valid scientific evidence is lacking.

On the other hand, the mRNA vaccine’s toxicity appears to result from a poor manufacturing process. They (vaccines) are most likely contaminated with bacteria (as indicated by the presence of DNA in vaccine vials) used for manufacturing; however, they are not properly removed (link).

Therefore, there is a strong possibility that cancers, as well as heart issues/inflammation, are misdiagnosed, but illnesses are effects of bacterial infections. This serious oversight must be considered more thoroughly by actual scientists and may be treated accordingly, like with antiinfectives. Antiinfectives have been described as successful in treating so-called COVID-19 or its vaccine toxicities (link).

(link)

I would agree with such an observation that Ivermectin and Fenbendazole can be treatments for so-called tubo-cancer. I believe “turbo-cancer” is a misdiagnosed illness (based on doctors’ science – the fake science) when it could very well be a microbial infection. As the two medicines mentioned above are known for their anti-parasitic effect, it is not surprising they provide a remedy for the disease, a commonly noted side effect of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Ivermectin and COVID-19 Controversy – Why? (link)
Why Do People Get Sick – A View! (Part 2) (link)
Why do people get sick – a view! (link)