Category: Vaccine


The following article has been written in response to a query.

Query:

Saeed Qureshi Let’s say you have two groups. One given the drug/treatment and the other a placebo. Then, it’s observed that over a long period of time one group suffers certain side effects and the other doesn’t. Can’t we at least determine from this that whatever is in the drug is causing these side effects?

Response:

Your argument is logical and valid, and one can certainly draw inferences from it. However, such inferences remain observations—they cannot be treated as firm conclusions or as valid scientific studies. The key distinction lies in the nature of scientific research: a true scientific study requires controls, or in other words, a controlled design. At a minimum, three critical components must be addressed:

  • Input (the drug or treatment)
  • The human body (physiology of the volunteer/subject)
  • Output (the measured effect or response)
(more…)

The Florida Department of Health, in partnership with the governor, is going to be working to end all vaccine mandates in Florida. Every last one of them. (link)

There is good news.

However, this should be viewed only as a beginning, not an end. It does not address the core problem with vaccines, which is that they are not a scientifically valid treatment. There is no science behind them. Therefore, not only should mandates be removed, but vaccination itself must be abolished. There is no proven benefit—at least none shown scientifically—since there is no virus or illness against which they have been tested.

Keeping vaccines approved gives the false impression to the public that they are useful and valuable products. Worse, it props up the false legitimacy of “medical science” as if it were real science, when in fact it is neither. One must be extremely cautious in continuing with this so-called “medical science,” which is a fraudulent construct that must be stopped.

No grants or funding should be allocated to “medical science” under the guidance or authority of physicians, because it was precisely this group (lacking scientific education and expertise) that created the vaccination problem in the first place.

COVID and vaccines – ask and listen (link)
Vaccines and the COVID virus (link)
Claims of vaccines’ relevancy and efficacy – a big fat lie! (link)
The science behind COVID and vaccines! (link)
A Simple And Direct Question RFK Jr Needs To Ask – A Suggestion (link)
Quackery in White Coats (link)
Chemistry, Not Medicine, Defines Science (link)
Critical Review of Medical Authority and Scientific Legitimacy (link)
Questioning Medical Authority: Show Your Science Credentials (link)

Anyone with a shred of intelligence knows there is no virus. RFK Jr. is far more intelligent than most, and he surely knows this. The issue is that the medical establishment always drags anyone who questions the virus or vaccine narrative into their own “court of science.” In that court, they always win, because it is their court—others are beaten down, silenced, or give up. No one is allowed to truly challenge their version of “science,” which is nothing more than fraud.

Medical experts, in particular physicians, are, in fact, the least knowledgeable in real science. They have zero scientific credentials, yet they lie about having them. This is the critical point: rather than demanding records on vaccines or viruses, authorities must first demand that they prove their claim that their work is based on science and that they have the required education and expertise in science. They cannot—because they have no credentials. At that moment, the game is over. Not just viruses, but vaccines and much more will unravel.

Quackery in White Coats (link)
Chemistry, Not Medicine, Defines Science (link)
Critical Review of Medical Authority and Scientific Legitimacy (link)
Questioning Medical Authority: Show Your Science Credentials (link)

I would like to add some comments on the narrative (link). For convenience, the narrative is attached below.

Regarding the statement: “Immunization Practices (ACIP) has formed a new work group to review COVID-19 vaccines, focusing on safety, effectiveness, immunogenicity, and persistence of vaccine components such as mRNA, spike protein, and lipid nanoparticles.”

It must be stated plainly: the so-called components—mRNA, spike protein, lipid-related nanoparticles—are imaginary constructs manufactured by what passes as “medical science.” This is not legitimate science, but rather a pseudo-scientific framework built on assumptions rather than evidence. The entire narrative is tied to the concept of “viruses.” Yet, no virus has ever been scientifically demonstrated to exist as an actual, isolated, and purified entity in humans or animals. Without that proof, the rest collapses.

(more…)

When people hear the word nanoparticle, they often imagine tiny hard specks—like dust or sand—floating around. But in pharmaceutical science, the “nanoparticles” used in vaccines are not solid particles at all. They are more like microscopic bubbles made of fatty molecules (lipids).

Lipids have a dual nature: one end of the molecule loves water, the other end avoids it. This is the same principle that makes soap work. When you wash your hands, soap molecules surround oily dirt or dust, hiding the “water-fearing” parts inside and keeping the “water-loving” parts outside. This forms small bubbles, called micelles, which carry away the dirt when rinsed with water.

In the same way, when lipids are mixed in water during pharmaceutical manufacturing, they self-assemble into tiny bubbles—liposomes or lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). Instead of dirt, however, these bubbles are said to carry messenger RNA (mRNA).

(more…)

Physicians and related medical experts claim to follow and practice science. Billions of dollars in funding support their so-called “scientific research.” Yet in reality, they hold no genuine credentials (education and expertise) in science or science research. Their education and expertise rest on a standard, non-scientific undergraduate degree—an M.D. Is it not outright fraud to practice and promote something for which one has no credentials?

Will HHS, FDA, CDC, NIH, and similar regulatory agencies worldwide dare to investigate this fraud?

What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)
Chemistry, Not Medicine, Defines Science (link)
An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)

Seeking advice from physicians on medications, including vaccines, is not the issue. They are trained for that purpose—mainly to prescribe medicines as needed. It is no different from asking the front-end clerk at an auto shop for advice about a car part or a potential issue with your car. Their role is functional, not foundational.

The real problem begins when physicians are assumed to understand how medicines are developed, how they actually work, or how they are manufactured. They do not. That knowledge belongs to science—specifically chemistry, a discipline with centuries of rigorous foundations.

Medicines are chemicals. Their discovery, testing, and production are properly the domain of chemistry, not medicine. Physicians are not scientists, and when they speak as though they are, their claims are misleading at best and fraudulent at worst. For this reason, anyone without training in science and chemistry should be excluded from directing or conducting scientific research.

This confusion has fueled dangerous misconceptions and harmful developments. Viruses, vaccines, PCR tests, antibody tests, and countless diagnostic products have been falsely presented under the banner of “medical science.” But there is no such thing as “medical science.” Medicine is a practice of prescribing and administering treatments; science—real science—belongs to chemistry and physics.

Allowing physicians to lead in areas where they have no true expertise has led to repeated disasters. The narratives surrounding viruses, infections, and even cancer—promoted as if grounded in science—are, in fact, constructs built on fragile foundations. These practices have not delivered genuine medical benefits; instead, they have imposed massive harm on public health and drained societal wealth.

The solution is clear: separate medicine from science. Let doctors prescribe, but let scientists—true scientists—develop and evaluate the treatments. Only then can society avoid the cycle of fraud, fear, and failure that has shaped the modern “medical science” – the fake and false one.

I listened to Dr. Bret Weinstein’s response to Piers Morgan’s question in this 1:34-minute video clip and noted several errors or unsupported claims (link). For example:

He stated: “… in an effort to provide immunity against COVID-19 …”

There is no scientifically valid evidence that COVID-19 exists. It is a belief that COVID-19 is caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2. However, there is no evidence that this virus has ever been shown to exist. Therefore, a disease attributed to this virus cannot exist.

Dr. Weinstein is an evolutionary biologist or biology expert, not in the true sense of the word a scientist—particularly in the field of substance isolation and characterization, like viruses. That domain belongs to science proper, specifically chemistry, not biology. Hence, not only is he making a false statement, but he may not even realize it. He should reconsider his position on this topic.

(more…)

Propaganda and marketing have been so pervasive that the public and public leadership have come to genuinely believe that physicians possess complete knowledge of medicines— chemicals and their interactions (chemical reactions), and also related health care in general. They are presented as all-knowing authorities who carry the full understanding of illness and treatment processes in their back pocket, armed with “modern science” and the limits of human intelligence and capability.

This image of expertise is carefully constructed in different areas, such as:

(more…)

I have written several articles on PCR for my blog, but it seems many readers may not have understood them fully. So, here is another attempt to explain.

PCR stands for Polymerase Chain Reaction. Breaking it down, polymerase is a combination of two parts: polymer and -ase. Polymers are chemical compounds that can come from natural or synthetic sources. Examples of natural polymers include cellulose, starch, glycogen, proteins, enzymes, and nucleic acids such as DNA and RNA, while synthetic polymers include polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, PVC, Teflon, and nylon. All of these substances are well-characterized, certified, and widely available, mostly from chemical suppliers.

The suffix “-ase” indicates an enzyme, a protein that acts as a catalyst in biochemical reactions. For instance, hydrogen and oxygen will not combine to form water on their own; a spark or catalyst is required to initiate the reaction. Similarly, in biological systems, enzymes trigger countless reactions essential for life.

(more…)