Category: Virus

There is little doubt that individuals like Dr. Marcus Zervos (M.D.) — and many others within the medical establishment — have failed to act in an honest and honorable manner (‘I’d Be Finished’: Vaccine Researcher Trashes Own Study to Save Career, link). Yet, a more profound and more important question arises: why would they not act honorably?

The answer is simple but disturbing. Any individual within the system who dares to question or expose misconduct would be judged by the very authorities he is accusing — the so-called medical experts operating under the umbrella of “medical science.” In such an environment, even legitimate criticism is dismissed as a “personal opinion,” or the critic is accused of conducting a “poorly designed study.” The system is structured so that the accused also serve as the judges, leaving no possibility of an objective review or scientific accountability.

This is not a theoretical concern. The same situation occurred to the author himself when he questioned the validity of the drug dissolution testing used to assess the quality of pharmaceutical products such as tablets and capsules. This test, long accepted by pharmaceutical authorities, is scientifically false and fraudulent. Despite raising these concerns for years, the issue was repeatedly deflected, with officials insisting that “medical and pharmaceutical authorities” must address it — the very bodies benefiting from its continued use.

Eventually, a formal complaint was submitted through a Citizen Petition to the U.S. FDA. Predictably, FDA experts reviewed the petition. The same experts enforce and defend the very technique in question. After nearly four years, the FDA’s final response was that the test “Method validation and verification encompasses the apparatus used in the method; the apparatus is not separately validated.” Case closed. The circular — and rather dodgy — reasoning was complete: the apparatus wasn’t validated, yet it was deemed validated simply because the authorities stated so (link).

The same fraudulent logic applies to the PCR test, which has been misused as a diagnostic tool for viruses and illnesses without any scientific validation. Despite repeated objections from independent scientists, medical authorities continue to rely on it — fueling false claims of viral diseases, pandemics, and vaccine needs.

At the core of this problem lies the medical and pharmaceutical establishment itself — the main culprit of dishonesty and fraud — which has falsely claimed to be practicing “science.” In truth, it operates under a counterfeit version of science, detached from the foundations of true science: chemistry, physics, and mathematics.

What makes the current exposure of this fraud possible is that certain inquiries — such as those initiated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (RFK, Jr.) and Senator Ron Johnson— come from outside the medical hierarchy, from individuals not bound by medical credentials or interests. Only such independent third-party oversight can bring truth to light.

If genuine audits or evaluations of “medical science” are ever to occur, they must be conducted by experts in real science — chemists, physicists, and mathematicians — not by physicians judging themselves. Once such an independent review is undertaken, the fraud of “virus,” “vaccine,” and “medical science” will collapse swiftly, revealing the profession for what it has become: a trade built on unscientific assumptions rather than measurable truth. It is time, therefore, to handle this issue from its proper perspective — through the lens of true science (chemistry), not medical authority.

“If you claim that cancers are caused by a parasite, the burden of proof is on you to identify that parasite.” (From FB, link)

Fair enough. But I am not claiming that a parasite causes cancer. What I am suggesting is far more fundamental — that cancer itself may not exist as a distinct disease. What we call “cancer” might simply be a mislabelled condition — perhaps involving parasites or other microbial agents — that has never been properly examined from a true scientific standpoint.

It is time to think afresh. For decades, “cancer research” has produced endless classifications, new names, and countless studies, yet no real cure. Is it not legitimate to question what these researchers have actually achieved, beyond showing frightening images and promoting highly expensive treatments and services?

The deeper problem may lie in who is conducting the research. Medical professionals, rather than actual scientists, dominate the field. Most cancer researchers are trained in medicine or biology, not in the actual sciences — chemistry, physics, or mathematics — that form the foundation of real scientific inquiry. As a result, much of their work lacks the precision and discipline that true science demands.

The situation resembles what we see in virology (now commonly recognized as a false and fraudulent activity or research): vast amounts of funding, publications, and laboratory activity, yet no verifiable isolation or purification of the claimed entities — whether viruses or cancer “cells.” It is a bizarre state of affairs.

The real path forward lies not in more grants or drug trials, but in the courage to ask whether “cancer” has ever been defined scientifically at all — rather than through images and obscure chemical jargon.

“We hope this additional treatment will stop the cancer from returning.”

They are working with hope, not with science. That is the essence of today’s so-called “medical science” — it runs on hope, not on evidence grounded in chemistry or physics.

Doctors speak of “mRNA technology,” but there is no such technology in the scientific sense. It is merely a chemical formulation—a mixture said to contain a compound called mRNA. In truth, there is no verified test to confirm the presence or purity of this mRNA, because no isolated or purified reference material exists.

So, what remains? Hope — the same hope that surrounded the COVID-19 “mRNA vaccines.” Everyone now knows how that turned out: a human tragedy of global proportions, buried under layers of denial and cover-ups.

Just as with “viruses” — unseen, undefined, and unverified entities — the medical world now constructs “cancer” as another illusion, a diagnosis based on images and tissue fragments rather than isolated, characterized substances. Despite decades of funding and experimentation, they have not found, controlled, or scientifically explained either.

Yet, the public continues to trust “medical science,” unaware that its foundation rests on untested methods like the clinical trial — celebrated as the gold standard, but never scientifically validated for its intended purpose. It is not a scientific tool; it is a commercial and regulatory instrument designed to maintain control and to continue medical foolishness and fraud.

And so, the cycle continues:

Hope, not science — marketing, not measurement — faith, not proof.

It should be clearly understood that when medical experts refer to science, they mean medical science, not true science.

True science is the study of physical and tangible substances, guided by precise observation, experimentation, and measurement. It includes disciplines such as chemistry, physics, and mathematics — fields that rely on verifiable data, reproducible results, and the logical interpretation of evidence. Those who study these subjects in depth, supported by rigorous academic education and extensive experimental training, are the real scientists.

In contrast, what is called medical science is not science in the true sense. It is a fraudulent imitation of science, borrowing its language and symbols — especially from chemistry — but without its rigor or proof. Physicians’ claims to be “scientists” rest mainly on non-scientific professional, mostly undergraduate degrees such as the M.D., which offer no meaningful training in science and provide little or no genuine scientific credentials.

Over the past five or six decades, most of what has been presented as “medical research” has been false, misleading, or irrelevant — bearing little connection to real illness, its testing, or its treatment. This deception is most evident in the diagnosis of virus-based illnesses, the testing for them, and the development and administration of vaccines.

Despite billions of dollars spent through research grants and donations, there remains no purified sample of any virus, no scientifically validated test, and no vaccine proven effective against an actual, demonstrable virus. What exists instead are claims — supported by publications filled with the terminology of true science (chemistry) but devoid of its substance.

Therefore, physicians’ repeated assertions that they are “following science” must be critically examined. Most of these claims would collapse under the standards of genuine scientific evaluation. It is time to recognize that medical science is not real science — and that true understanding of health and disease can only come through the actual sciences, led by chemistry.

There is no scientific basis or justification for vaccination (link). I support Senator Rand Paul’s position on this matter and offer a scientific argument for it. Unfortunately, physicians are not in a position to counter this discussion, because the question is not medical (mistakenly assumed) but scientific in nature. Moreover, the defense of vaccination has become a matter of pride and ego within the medical community, rather than an objective evaluation of facts.

Institutions such as the CDC and FDA are now trapped in their own contradictions. Their predicament arises from years of misrepresenting medical practices as “science-based.” The central falsehood is the claim that the development and validation of vaccines are grounded in genuine science, and that physicians are scientists conducting scientific work. In reality, physicians receive little or no education, training, or experience in the true sciences—namely, chemistry, physics, and mathematics. Medicines, including vaccines, are chemical entities; therefore, their study and evaluation properly belong to chemistry, not medicine. What medicine presents in the name of science is, in fact, an imitation — a form of fake chemistry and fabricated experimentation.

(more…)

This perspective may be both interesting and disturbing from the standpoint of a scientist and student of science. Dr. Hazan claims to have been involved in science for an extended period (link). Yet her training is in medicine, and her work centers on clinical practice and studies, which she equates with science. But how does conducting clinical trials or working with bacteria suddenly make one a scientific expert—or a scientist? At best, such activities fall under applied biology and observational practice. Unfortunately, many people, including physicians, wrongly assume this qualifies them to call themselves scientists.

The most glaring flaw in her claims is the belief in viruses and her assertion that  “[her lab] was the first lab to document the entire sequence of the virus.” Scientifically, this is impossible without first isolating the virus itself. To illustrate: if one wishes to prove that sugarcane contains sugar, the process begins with obtaining authentic sugarcane, extracting and isolating the sugar, and characterizing it using well-established chemical methods. Only then can one confirm the presence of sugar in sugarcane. Without authentic sugarcane, any claim of “finding sugar” in it is nonsense. Repeating such claims in scientific language, or publishing them in medical journals, does not make them science.

The harsh truth is that medical experts are not doing science, nor are they scientists. They fail to grasp such analogies because they have never studied science rigorously, nor learned its proper research techniques and methods. Their false claims stem directly from this lack of education. The same misplaced authority of medicine—fundamentally non-scientific training—brought us the so-called fake pandemic, built on the illusion of a virus that never existed to begin with.

Therefore, my request to medical professionals is simple: please refrain from making false claims about “science.” You do not have the credentials, and an M.D. degree has no basis in science. It is essentially a non-science, undergraduate-level qualification in prescribing medicines and following diagnostic procedures, without genuine research. Presenting this as “science” is misleading, untrue, and potentially dangerous. The general public should be aware of the false claims of science.

False Priests of Science (link)  
A Simple And Direct Question RFK Jr Needs To Ask – A Suggestion (link)

“The greatest spreader of misinformation during the pandemic was the United States government.”
“And that is the weaponization of medical research itself.”
“And public-health officials were intellectually dishonest — they lied to the American people.”
Dr. Martin Makary (FDA Commissioner, link)

So why wasn’t this exposed earlier? Because it was buried inside the medical profession and shielded by the label “medical science” — a claim that protected the system from scrutiny. Criticism was silenced and independent checks were blocked. Meanwhile, today’s experts blame their predecessors while promoting the same “medical science.” The result: bogus diagnoses and fraudulent treatments will continue.

The solution is clear and urgent. Stop treating a corrupt “medical science” as an unquestionable truth. Let physicians use their judgment to guide patient care (writing prescriptions), rather than enforcing one-size-fits-all policies from centralized authorities. End all work masquerading as “medical science/research.” Treat medicines as chemical products that must be manufactured, tested, and regulated transparently by accountable chemical manufacturers — not hidden behind professional privilege or the false authority of so-called “pharmaceutical science.”


Do FDA and USP lie? Of course, all the time! (link)
An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link)
Claims of vaccines’ relevancy and efficacy – a big fat lie! (link)
The science behind COVID and vaccines! (link)
A Simple And Direct Question RFK Jr Needs To Ask – A Suggestion (link)
Quackery in White Coats (link)
Chemistry, Not Medicine, Defines Science (link)
Critical Review of Medical Authority and Scientific Legitimacy (link)
Questioning Medical Authority: Show Your Science Credentials (link)
What is science, and who are scientists? (link)
My training and expertise – people ask! (link)

I read a recent Substack article by Dr. Alejandro Diaz (Immunologist and Global Health Expert) commenting on RFK Jr.’s effort to clean up the medical swamp—a remarkable endeavor in its beginnings. (link)

But I want to focus on one particular part of RFK Jr.’s statement. In an HHS press release, he said:

“We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted.”

Here lies the problem: “reviewed the science and listened to the experts.”

In reality, those so-called “experts” are mostly physicians and public health policymakers—individuals routinely portrayed as scientists but who, in fact, are not. The irony is that many of those celebrated as “science experts” lack any formal scientific credentials. This is perhaps the most critical, yet consistently overlooked, element of fraud within the healthcare profession—something even RFK Jr. and others fail to recognize.

Take physicians, for example. They hold an M.D.—a professional degree, not a scientific one. It does not provide rigorous training in foundational sciences, particularly chemistry—the very discipline central to medicine, including vaccines. The vaccine disaster did not stem from science itself, but from non-scientists masquerading as scientists, conducting experimental studies that made no sense. Every so-called study on viruses or viral illnesses proceeded without an actual virus sample or a demonstrable illness. Instead, conclusions leaned almost entirely on the PCR test—a scientifically invalid tool, irrelevant, inaccurate, and unreliable—for detecting both the “virus” and its supposed illness. This is, at best, profound scientific ignorance and, at worst, deliberate fraud carried out under the banner of expertise or science.

In this light, RFK Jr.’s efforts stand as a remarkable contribution toward exposing fraudulent practices at the CDC and within the medical profession. Still, while his work is valuable, it is not grounded in true scientific research or review, but rather in his investigative efforts, aided by sympathetic physicians.

If genuine science had guided health policy, there would never have been “virus” claims to begin with—because viruses, as categorized, have never been shown to exist. And if the virus does not exist, then vaccines against it are impossible by definition. The vaccine tragedy unfolded precisely because fake “science,” conducted and endorsed by physicians without real scientific credentials, replaced actual science.

And now comes the so-called “next step”:

“These statements reflect a dramatic shift in federal vaccine strategy—away from mRNA and toward platforms like whole-virus vaccines and protein-based technologies.”

This makes clear that they intend to remain entrenched in the vaccine business. But as I have already described, there is no virus—and therefore no need, nor even the possibility, of developing any treatment or vaccine. What we are witnessing is not science but medical fantasy.

The author of the article, an immunologist (a branch of biology—hardly a science in the true sense here), is simply working to sustain their virus-based nonsense and pseudo-scientific narrative. RFK Jr. must remain vigilant against such insidious attempts to promote false science and to divert attention from the urgent task of exposing and dismantling fraudulent medical and biological claims that have misled the world.

It is not just the concept that fails, but the logistics as well. To test a vaccine, one must separate an “infected” population from a “healthy” one. That requires a validated test. Yet no validated test exists, because there is no established reference standard for a virus. Therefore, properly designed clinical trials for vaccines are impossible to conduct. What continues instead is the endless beating of a dead horse: viruses, vaccines, and vaccination—vehicles designed only to extract enormous sums of money for fake science and fake scientists. The result is nothing more than a colossal waste of human and financial resources.

And then comes the hollow claim:

“I believe the President and his team at HHS have a momentous opportunity to truly reform these institutions and have a lasting impact on America’s public health.”

This suggests that no lessons have been learned from the catastrophic COVID-19 episode. Continuing down this path—with viruses and vaccines—only ensures that history will repeat itself, likely on an even larger scale.

It is time to stop. There is no such thing as “medical science.” There is no virus, and there never was. Therefore, there is no need for vaccines, nor could there ever be an effective one. To proceed with this charade is not progress but the continuation of fraudulent science—an enterprise that harms people, wastes resources, and corrupts the very meaning of science itself.

Quackery in White Coats (link)
Chemistry, Not Medicine, Defines Science (link)
Critical Review of Medical Authority and Scientific Legitimacy (link)
Questioning Medical Authority: Show Your Science Credentials (link)

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. In general, I agree with your comment and conclusion—except for the last sentence: “A formal education in a topic doesn’t guarantee you are right.” (link)

I often hear this view, and frankly, it troubles me. Yes, many scientists wrongly treat their education as a seal of correctness. However, a more significant issue is that non-scientists often forcefully impose their views with absolute certainty. This is the real tragedy: those who have studied and worked in genuine science are placed on the same level as those who have not. People without scientific training—including physicians—often assume the authority of science without having been scientists themselves.

(more…)

Cures or treatments are only possible for real illnesses—not for imaginary or fabricated ones like “viruses” and their supposed diseases. For decades, billions of dollars have been poured into developing treatments for viral infections, yet nothing has been eradicated; instead, infections appear more frequently, not just in isolated cases but as global “pandemics.” The irony is that no one has ever produced an actual sample of the virus they claim to be working so hard to cure. Has the world ever seen greater con-artistry—run under the banner of science by people with no true expertise in science?

The same holds true for cancer. Billions have been spent on cancer research by the very same “science” experts who push the virus narrative. If what they label as “cancer” is most likely a microbial infection, then, of course, there can be no cure under their framework. Instead, they push lethal chemicals and destructive procedures, generating enormous profits for practitioners and corporations. Why would they ever admit it is a microbial infection treatable with inexpensive medicines? That would not only collapse their business model but also expose the fraud of modern science—another textbook case of modern-day con-artistry.

It is time to stop funding this fraudulent version of “medical science.” No more research grants for it, no more unearned titles of “science experts” or “scientists” for physicians pretending to practice science. Then—and only then—will we begin to see illnesses truly disappear from this earth.

Cancer or Misdiagnosis? An Uncomfortable Truth (link)