Category: Analaytical Testing

Post Views: 26

Blog Article: Fake And False Science Of Illnesses And Diagnoses (link). FB (link). For convenience, questions are copied below the response.

Response:

@ “… is vacciantion build on the simmilar principle as homeopathy / administering a small doses of alleged poison to treat the illness/”

I have some knowledge and personal experience with homeopathy. Based on this, I would say that they are not similar. To me, they are as similar to comparing electric and gas-powered vehicles because they both require a (small) battery or electric power to start the car. So, they both could be considered electric-powered. However, they are very different in operation – there is no comparison.

Concerning “small doses/amount of alleged poison,” I do not think homeopathy injects poison. On the other hand, I am certain, based on what is available in the literature about vaccines, that they are not in small amounts (compared to homeopathic doses) but certainly significantly large amounts of filth/gunk (potentially poison). I would not suggest anyone take it, considering the science/chemistry aspect of it.

(more…)
Post Views: 76

Often, one hears such announcements, i.e., FDA approves, concerning drugs and drug products from the FDA and other similar regulatory authorities. People, including physicians, assume that the FDA independently evaluates the products and that the claims (safe and effective) are based on scientific studies or evidence.

Unfortunately, it is not true.

An approved drug product does not mean it is safe and effective, but it only means that it complies with the FDA requirements for putting its label or stamp for approval. In short, approval is for compliance mostly with arbitrary standards and requirements that do not reflect the products’ quality (by extension, safety and efficacy). Prove me wrong!

(more…)
Post Views: 31

I came across this article “Genetic tracing of market wildlife and viruses at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.” (link)

There are three at least issues with claims made:

  • Genetic virus tracing cannot be done because a virus has not been isolated and characterized. Therefore, the gene cannot be established or traced. The publication makes a false claim about the virus.
  • The virus cartoon in the abstract’s top left corner cannot be true because no sample of the isolated virus is currently available.

    As per the publication, “This study did not generate new unique reagents, but processed data generated for this study can be found in the supplementary files, and reconstructed genomes and phylogenies can be found at the data and code repository associated with this work.” No experimental work was done. But, computer-generated codes/” sequences” were used. Therefore, work was not done with the virus but with computing. (False claim about working with the virus)
  • The publication authors and institutions are related to medical and biological areas/subjects, not science, as commonly understood or implied. The publication may be understood as a science publication, which is incorrect. (link)

Therefore, I stamped it as certified BS’ (link)

Post Views: 20
medicine, healthcare and pharmacy concept – different pills and capsules of drugs

A drug dissolution test is a test used to establish the quality of a pharmaceutical product, such as a tablet or capsule. This test is conducted because the drug (often called active ingredient) needs to be released from the product for its absorption into the blood to elicit its therapeutic effect.

The test is conducted in place of a clinical test/study called bioavailability or bioequivalence, a pharmacology/pharmacokinetic study type. The test is the backbone of quality assessment of all tablet and capsule products. It is a requirement of worldwide authorities, including the FDA, Health Canada, etc., and pharmacopeias such as USP, BP, EP, etc.

(more…)
Post Views: 18

Pharmaceuticals/drugs/medicines are often pure (potent) chemicals that are nonphysiological and can be detrimental to normal body processes (reflected as adverse effects/reactions), as can natural products and ingredients, especially if taken in large amounts and for extended periods.

In general, allopathic drugs are developed and should be prescribed for their acute effect to minimize or avoid their serious effects. Further scientific research is needed to understand the mechanism of drug actions or interactions (good or bad) to address the harmful effects of drugs and, by extension, develop safe and efficacious medicines.

(more…)
Post Views: 49

Someone wrote, “Viruses have always been imaginary. Always.” It is a correct claim.

The question is why this claim has not been accepted; even recently, some very vocal experts, including doctors and biologists, have forcefully argued against the existence of viruses.

Doctors and biologists dominate both groups and claim to be science experts, followers, or scientists. Interestingly, both groups accuse each other of being followers of pseudoscience.

The issue is that doctors/experts in neither group are science experts or scientists. The subjects (medicine and biology) are not (experimental or empirical) science subjects. The only science subjects in this regard are physics, chemistry, and/or mathematics. Medicine (primarily chemicals) and biology (isolation and characterization of biological components, which are also mainly chemicals) have to be dealt with by the science subject (chemistry).

Science can only deal with physically existing things available in pure form to work, hence absent from medical and biology areas. Medical and biological “sciences” are based on narratives and speculation, often dealing with imaginary things like viruses, vaccines, etc.

Therefore, viruses are imaginary. Doctors and medical experts need to stop claiming that they are science followers and scientists and that “viruses” exist. Such claims are simply false and fraudulent.

PS. An M.D. degree is not a science degree! (link).

Post Views: 83

Different doctors suggest different chemicals (cleverly named as medicines/treatments), such as mRNA vaccine, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, etc., to address the issue (symptoms/infections) of COVID-19. The claims of the effectiveness of these chemicals are based on studies (implying “scientific or experimental studies”) often published in “scientific” journals. However, from critical and logical considerations, these studies and claims are not scientific – as no virus or infection is available for testing or developing treatments. Testing a virus or its infection requires a valid test that is unavailable and cannot be developed until a physical virus sample is available [1]. Hence, all claims of testing, viruses, or treatments are scientifically fake and false.

(more…)