I came across this article “Genetic tracing of market wildlife and viruses at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.” (link)

There are three at least issues with claims made:

  • Genetic virus tracing cannot be done because a virus has not been isolated and characterized. Therefore, the gene cannot be established or traced. The publication makes a false claim about the virus.
  • The virus cartoon in the abstract’s top left corner cannot be true because no sample of the isolated virus is currently available.

    As per the publication, “This study did not generate new unique reagents, but processed data generated for this study can be found in the supplementary files, and reconstructed genomes and phylogenies can be found at the data and code repository associated with this work.” No experimental work was done. But, computer-generated codes/” sequences” were used. Therefore, work was not done with the virus but with computing. (False claim about working with the virus)
  • The publication authors and institutions are related to medical and biological areas/subjects, not science, as commonly understood or implied. The publication may be understood as a science publication, which is incorrect. (link)

Therefore, I stamped it as certified BS’ (link)

Here is the time to wish you all the very best for the New Year. It is time to remember the past and look forward to hope in the New World that awaits us (not the New World Order, which is disgusting, as understood).

I wish you all to be happy and healthy and achieve genuine success.

The success is the one I worry about the most, i.e., it must be genuine. It means it must bring health and happiness to you and others. The past four years of the virus/COVID-19 Pandemic have seen a tragic example of false (non-genuine) success for some, particularly in medical and pharmaceutical areas.

They all claimed to be science experts or so-called scientists; however, they ruined the lives and livelihoods of a large world population. It is the biggest lie they told to achieve “success.”

The science in this regard is chemistry, which they never studied in significant detail. They created version after version of their “science” to promote that false science, the fraud – in the name of success.

Therefore, my hope and prayer for the New Year is that they should get out of the “science business” and return to practice what they are being taught and learned, i.e., prescribing and delivering well-established allopathic medicines. No more inventing new illnesses and their treatments and Germ and Terrain theories, please. They are all mental gymnastics without scientific support or relevance to public health.

Unfortunately, this mental gymnastic has created a new breed of even worse “scientists” who just read some articles, imagine stuff, and promote “science research.” You need to help yourself as no one is there to help you. May Almighty protect you from the false “success” chasers!

If you ask me for a suggestion to get out of the unfortunate situation, I would suggest that as allopathic medicines are chemicals or chemical-based, they must be manufactured and sold on the open market (not behind the counters) by appropriately trained chemists with a guarantee of the quality of their products with a certificate readable and understandable by consumers/patients.

With this note, I wish you all the best for the coming New Year. Enjoy your life while keeping a distance from fear and the fearmongers, especially virus promoters.

I read a recent article by Dr. Maryanne Demasi, “Did Cochrane’s study on masks get it wrong?” which analyzes two views about the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of face masks in protecting from viruses and their infection (link).

There is no doubt that both views are presented by parties with high credentials emphasizing their expertise and experience in a write-up. Below are the two views in a nutshell:

  • Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (Cochrane Review, link)

is ” … 2023 Cochrane review which concluded that wearing a face mask “probably makes little or no difference” in preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission.”

  • What Went Wrong with a Highly Publicized COVID Mask Analysis? (link)

Criticizes the above by stating, “The Cochrane Library, a trusted source of health information, misled the public by prioritizing rigor over reality” by Naomi Oreskes (Professor of the History of Science at Harvard University)

Reading the articles and having a background in science, especially in research, while working at Health Canada as a research scientist for 30 years, I am quite concerned about the poor quality of scientific research and reasoning provided in the publication (Cochrane Review) and follow-up discussions. Continue here

Please support my ongoing effort to explain and clarify the scientific misunderstandings about COVID-19 related to viruses, vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and associated testing (the most dodgy aspect). Providing the most authoritative sources of true science-based information on the subject.

You may help:

By obtaining a copy of Helpful Notes and/or the Book;

Visiting my blog (clicking your favorite info ads)

(If using, please temporarily turn off the ad blocker) and/or:

Donating

Kindly consider this request urgent and also share it with your friends. Thank you.

A medical degree, such as M.D., is like any other four or 5-year undergraduate non-science degree. It does not provide training in science, such as for isolation, purification, and characterization or identification of substances or chemicals/medicines, which led the experts to make and believe in false conclusions that the virus exists and has been isolated.

Moreover, developing a treatment (such as a vaccine) also belongs to the experimental science subject, which requires testing the treatments against the target, such as a virus or illness. Unfortunately, lack of science and training led the experts to make false claims that treatment has been developed, while it is scientifically impossible and illogical to make such a claim. No virus (or its sample) is available to test and develop the treatment. Injecting unknown and unpurified gunk (so-called “vaccines”) in humans resulted in devastating outcomes (adverse effects without any benefit).

It is a textbook case of incompetency and ignorance—an example set for many generations to come. The only solution to address the colossal failure is to stop believing in the virus and vaccinations. Arrogance is the hindrance that needs to be addressed.

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.

The mRNA vaccine’s lack of usefulness and severe adverse effects have generally been recognized (e.g., see link), which I accurately predicted at the pandemic’s beginning, even before the vaccine’s introduction (link).

The basis of this prediction was that proper vaccine clinical trials (for safety and efficacy assessment) would require pure and isolated virus specimens and a valid test to monitor it. Both were missing; therefore, the appropriate vaccine could not be developed.

There is a trend in highlighting the toxicity of the mRNA vaccine linking to various components, e.g., spike-protein and DNA/RNA contamination (link, link).

 If one reads the articles critically, it should be evident that these are typical biology/virology narratives (fairy tales) presented as science, like claiming the existence of the virus, with heavily worded scientific jargon.

Sorry, the described narratives are unrelated to science or the issue. It is a narrative to continue to promote the virus and mRNA vaccine theory/philosophy and, more importantly, seek more funding for “science research” to find the source of impurity/contamination, which they will never find. Why? Because they are dealing with chemicals (vaccines, RNAs, proteins) manufacturing and their isolation and purification, a subject (chemistry) most experts involved have limited or no knowledge of, including the authorities such as the FDA and CDC.

 As I described in my recent articles (here and here), the people (including “scientists”) assume they are dealing with mRNA, but in fact, it is not mRNA but selectively concentrated filth from bacterial culture (labeled as “vaccine”). The isolation and purification of mRNA or vaccines (and its quality controls) can only be established using validated tests that do not exist.

So, read such articles cautiously, and to address the cause of the lack of efficacy and adverse effects, consult knowledgeable subject experts with experience in isolating and purifying substances. In the meantime, ask for stopping the vaccination (preferably all vaccines) by an independent third (non-medical) to complete an appropriate analysis of the products and to further prevent the tragedy of vaccination. May Almighty save us all from this witchcraft that currently is in practice.

I will not make many friends and will annoy many others, but the truth or reality has to be told, known, and understood, i.e.,

Listening and seeking advice from medical experts, such as physicians,  about medicine developments and manufacturing and working of medicines (or science in general) is like asking an ice cream vendor about cattle farming or dairy product manufacturing. The same applies to diagnostic testing, i.e., their development, validation, and interpretation.

The pandemic and its link to the virus and vaccine developments have been created by the medical experts’ lack of knowledge or ignorance about the science. Consider learning the actual science that has thoroughly been violated in this regard. It is not that difficult to learn and understand if one ignores the scientifically sounding jargon published in the medical and pharmaceutical literature.

People, including experts, must realize that the thinking that created the problem cannot solve it.

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.

For example, read here:

Science In Medical And Pharmaceutical Institutions, Including Regulatory = Nonsense! (link)

An Eye-Opener (link)

Absence of science in medical/pharmaceutical professions – shocking but true! (link)

Science is missing – simple and clear! (link)

For further details: Helpful NotesBook (Slaying The Virus And Vaccine Dragon)Blog