Category: Vaccine
The views often described about science and scientists are usually more philosophical in nature. Such views, though valid and worthy of discussion, confuses the situation and diminish efforts to get out of the fraudulent so-called medical and virological sciences.
At this stage, a direct approach for science and scientists is needed to get out of the current tragic situation of viruses and pandemics and the perpetual or unending use of potent chemicals in the name of medicines.
In this respect, a working definition is that science is the study and training in chemistry, physics, and/or mathematics, and scientists are those who are involved in these subjects and have many years of hands-on working experience.
Furthermore, science and scientists work with substances that physically exist and are available and measurable directly or indirectly using validated scientific techniques. Anyone claiming to be working (e.g., physicians, virologists, etc.) with presumed or imaginary substances, like a virus, virus’s RNA, and proteins, or their illnesses, must be ignored from the science or scientists category.
People often object to my views/articles, stating that I only reference my blog articles (i.e., self-referencing) and do not cite articles from peer-reviewed journals concerning the existence of the virus and its related topics. The lack of articles on the subject in peer-reviewed journals is of concern about the credibility and authenticity of my work.
On the other hand, they argue that numerous scientific articles from various sources are available and published in peer-reviewed journals showing, that the virus exists and has been isolated. Hence, their claims for the virus’s existence are credible.
People here are confusing consensus with the true physical (experimental) science. The view is that many studies about the virus have been published in the literature, so the virus must be there and isolated. That is consensus. However, I practice and describe experimental physical science (actual science – chemistry), which requires an actual sample of a substance to work with, in this case, the virus. As no actual virus sample is available, I cannot do scientific studies, publish, or write like others, i.e., publish fake science studies (for example, see here).
This practice of fake science in the medical/virology areas is common and alarming. It cannot be addressed internally as they all believe fake science is real/actual science, causing huge damage to science and the public.
An external audit can only address the issue, which will quickly show that medical experts have been working with fake science and have never been with actual science. If not all, most of the publications will have to be withdrawn as having no merit or value. Most people who are not knowledgeable in science do not realize the disastrous fakeness of science in the medical and pharmaceutical areas.
I hope this helps clear up the concern.
Some say science is what follows or adheres to the Scientific Method; otherwise, it is pseudoscience. It is like saying cooking is what follows the cooking method. Is it not a circular definition or argument?
In reality, science comes first. The “Scientific Method” comes after; it is a derivative of or dependent on science.
(Actual) science means studying chemistry, physics, and mathematics in significant detail. One studies science and then develops its methods (for understanding and extending scientific concepts) using scientific principles, which become true scientific methods. Therefore, one must first study science (chemistry, physics, and mathematics) to develop and deal with scientific methods.
On the other hand, people who do not study science but like to promote themselves as scientists/researchers promote a made-up definition of science based on the so-called “Scientific Method,” bypassing the requirements or needs of science or its study – clever! In this case, there is no need to know or understand science but to keep lecturing others about science. It’s a typical scam/con trick to consider oneself a scientist/researcher (i.e., without studying science). This is how many non-science experts became scientists/researchers. The issue is more visible in medicine and biology (such as virology, immunology, microbiology, etc).
Be vigilant about this con artistry or fake science promotion. If you like to know about actual science, look for people who studied and specialized in science subjects – chemistry, physics, and mathematics. More here.
There have been intense discussions on the “Scientific Method” approach concerning viruses and virology (extended into Germ Theory) on social media such as FaceBook and Telegram. Continue here.
It is a lie that medical and pharmaceutical experts follow science. They do not study, get training, or practice science. The actual science is chemistry, as most medicines are chemicals and behave in the body following the principles of chemistry (the science), which these professionals hardly study or apply. There is no such thing as medical or pharmaceutical science. These are false and fraudulent versions of chemistry.
The assertions of the virus’ (SARS-COV-2) existence, its illness (COVID-19), and the development of vaccines (mRNA) have been false and fraudulent and can easily be shown so by applying basic scientific (chemical) principles.
In the future, avoid anyone who promotes (chemical) based medicines without having extensive knowledge and training in chemistry/science, such as isolation, testing, and test validation. Their claims almost certainly will be baseless and false.
I studied science/chemistry from grade 9th to Ph.D. level, specializing in analytical-organic chemistry, which makes learning time almost 12 years. Then, I worked for 35 years in the field.
I worked for five years in the industry (food/agriculture), where I supported (analytical) testing and helped isolate a toxin (vomitoxin, a fungal plant pathogen) using industrial-scale culturing. Following that, I spent thirty years with Health Canada as a research scientist (analytical, organic chemistry), working with testing for pharmaceuticals, both in vitro and in vivo, including clinical trials. Details of expertise and work experience may be found here, here.
The short bio above shows that I have not studied or trained as a medical practitioner (physician) or biological subject expert in virology, immunology, microbiology, etc. However, I interacted extensively with biological and medical experts, where people of my expertise and experience are considered “outsiders,” which is unfortunate and has resulted in medical issues, like the most recent one, COVID-19.
Continue here