Peer-Reviewed Literature – Virus/Virology

It is critical to note that all published literature on virology/virus (“scientific journals”) be considered discredited because it is based on claims that studies/experiments have been done using the virus when the virus has never been shown to exist and/or used in the studies.

Studies have generally used isolates/lysates, not viruses (or variants), but unknown impure soups (gunk). There is no evidence that the gunk contains a virus: a fatal misunderstanding of medical/pharmaceutical experts.

From the scientific perspective, all claims about the viruses or their variants should be considered false and fake, along with associated claims for the treatments, including vaccines.

Please stop promoting testing, viruses, and vaccines; nothing is real. They are harming the public and nations gravely.

Further information on the topic may be found here: Helpful Notes, the Book, and Blog by the author (Dr. Qureshi), who worked at Health Canada as a Research Scientist and had 35+ years of bench science experience in substance isolation, characterization, and analytical testing among other specialties.

Related Posts